消除澳大利亚公共/私人医疗保险的重复:选择退出风险调整补贴?

IF 0.1
F. Paolucci, J. Butler, W. V. D. Ven
{"title":"消除澳大利亚公共/私人医疗保险的重复:选择退出风险调整补贴?","authors":"F. Paolucci, J. Butler, W. V. D. Ven","doi":"10.22459/AG.18.02.2011.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia's existing health-financing arrangements lead to partial duplication in coverage for private health insurance (PHI) holders. The two options to remove duplication are: 1) allowing individuals to 'opt out' from Medicare either (a) by purchasing PHI or (b) by self-insuring via medical savings accounts or other pre-payment arrangements; 2) confining PHI to the coverage of supplementary services. This paper argues in favour of Option 1(a), and argues that from an efficiency perspective PHI should be fully substitutive of Medicare coverage (that is, 'opting out' should be allowed); community rating should be replaced by premium bands; and the 30-40 per cent ad valorem subsidy for PHI should be replaced by ex-ante risk-adjusted subsidies.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"69 1","pages":"49-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removing Duplication in Public/Private Health Insurance in Australia: Opting Out With Risk-adjusted Subsidies?\",\"authors\":\"F. Paolucci, J. Butler, W. V. D. Ven\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AG.18.02.2011.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Australia's existing health-financing arrangements lead to partial duplication in coverage for private health insurance (PHI) holders. The two options to remove duplication are: 1) allowing individuals to 'opt out' from Medicare either (a) by purchasing PHI or (b) by self-insuring via medical savings accounts or other pre-payment arrangements; 2) confining PHI to the coverage of supplementary services. This paper argues in favour of Option 1(a), and argues that from an efficiency perspective PHI should be fully substitutive of Medicare coverage (that is, 'opting out' should be allowed); community rating should be replaced by premium bands; and the 30-40 per cent ad valorem subsidy for PHI should be replaced by ex-ante risk-adjusted subsidies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"49-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.18.02.2011.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.18.02.2011.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

澳大利亚现有的保健筹资安排导致私人健康保险(PHI)持有人的保险范围部分重复。消除重复的两种选择是:1)允许个人“选择退出”医疗保险(a)通过购买PHI或(b)通过医疗储蓄账户或其他预付款安排自行投保;2)将PHI限制在补充服务范围内。本文支持选项1(a),并认为从效率的角度来看,PHI应该完全替代医疗保险(也就是说,应该允许“选择退出”);社区收费应以收费波段取代;对PHI的30% - 40%从价补贴应被事前风险调整补贴所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removing Duplication in Public/Private Health Insurance in Australia: Opting Out With Risk-adjusted Subsidies?
Australia's existing health-financing arrangements lead to partial duplication in coverage for private health insurance (PHI) holders. The two options to remove duplication are: 1) allowing individuals to 'opt out' from Medicare either (a) by purchasing PHI or (b) by self-insuring via medical savings accounts or other pre-payment arrangements; 2) confining PHI to the coverage of supplementary services. This paper argues in favour of Option 1(a), and argues that from an efficiency perspective PHI should be fully substitutive of Medicare coverage (that is, 'opting out' should be allowed); community rating should be replaced by premium bands; and the 30-40 per cent ad valorem subsidy for PHI should be replaced by ex-ante risk-adjusted subsidies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信