通过大脑进行统治:神经政治学、神经科学和主观性

N. Rose, Joelle M. Abi-Rached
{"title":"通过大脑进行统治:神经政治学、神经科学和主观性","authors":"N. Rose, Joelle M. Abi-Rached","doi":"10.3167/CA.2014.320102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"his article considers how the brain has become an object and target for governing human beings. How, and to what extent, has governing the conduct of human beings come to require, presuppose and utilize a knowledge of the human brain? How, and with what consequences, are so many aspects of human existence coming to be problematized in terms of the brain? And what role are these new ‘cerebral knowledges’ and technologies coming to play in our contemporary forms of subjectiication, and our ways of governing ourselves? Ater a brief historical excursus, we delineate four pathways through which neuroscience has let the lab and became entangled with the government of the living: psychopharmacology, brain imaging, neuroplasticity and genomics. We conclude by asking whether the ‘psychological complex’ of the twentieth century is giving way to a ‘neurobiological complex’ in the twenty-irst, and, if so, how the social and human sciences should respond.","PeriodicalId":84387,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge anthropology : a journal of the Department of Social Anthropology, Cambridge University","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing through the Brain: Neuropolitics, Neuroscience and Subjectivity\",\"authors\":\"N. Rose, Joelle M. Abi-Rached\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/CA.2014.320102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"his article considers how the brain has become an object and target for governing human beings. How, and to what extent, has governing the conduct of human beings come to require, presuppose and utilize a knowledge of the human brain? How, and with what consequences, are so many aspects of human existence coming to be problematized in terms of the brain? And what role are these new ‘cerebral knowledges’ and technologies coming to play in our contemporary forms of subjectiication, and our ways of governing ourselves? Ater a brief historical excursus, we delineate four pathways through which neuroscience has let the lab and became entangled with the government of the living: psychopharmacology, brain imaging, neuroplasticity and genomics. We conclude by asking whether the ‘psychological complex’ of the twentieth century is giving way to a ‘neurobiological complex’ in the twenty-irst, and, if so, how the social and human sciences should respond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge anthropology : a journal of the Department of Social Anthropology, Cambridge University\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"3-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge anthropology : a journal of the Department of Social Anthropology, Cambridge University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/CA.2014.320102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge anthropology : a journal of the Department of Social Anthropology, Cambridge University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/CA.2014.320102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

他的文章探讨了大脑如何成为统治人类的对象和目标。人类行为的管理是如何以及在多大程度上要求、预设和利用人类大脑的知识的?就大脑而言,人类存在的这么多方面是如何成为问题的,又会带来什么后果呢?这些新的“大脑知识”和技术在我们当代的主体化形式和我们的自我管理方式中扮演着什么角色?在简短的历史回顾之后,我们描绘了神经科学与生物政府纠缠在一起的四条途径:精神药理学、脑成像、神经可塑性和基因组学。最后,我们提出这样的问题:20世纪的“心理情结”是否正在让位于21世纪的“神经生物学情结”,如果是这样,社会科学和人文科学应该如何回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governing through the Brain: Neuropolitics, Neuroscience and Subjectivity
his article considers how the brain has become an object and target for governing human beings. How, and to what extent, has governing the conduct of human beings come to require, presuppose and utilize a knowledge of the human brain? How, and with what consequences, are so many aspects of human existence coming to be problematized in terms of the brain? And what role are these new ‘cerebral knowledges’ and technologies coming to play in our contemporary forms of subjectiication, and our ways of governing ourselves? Ater a brief historical excursus, we delineate four pathways through which neuroscience has let the lab and became entangled with the government of the living: psychopharmacology, brain imaging, neuroplasticity and genomics. We conclude by asking whether the ‘psychological complex’ of the twentieth century is giving way to a ‘neurobiological complex’ in the twenty-irst, and, if so, how the social and human sciences should respond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信