金融科技、大数据企业融资约束与大数据产业发展:基于中介效应和门槛效应的实证分析

Mu Zhang, Cheng-Fu Cao, Zhiyuan Lv
{"title":"金融科技、大数据企业融资约束与大数据产业发展:基于中介效应和门槛效应的实证分析","authors":"Mu Zhang, Cheng-Fu Cao, Zhiyuan Lv","doi":"10.54560/jracr.v11i4.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on theoretical analysis, we select the relevant data of 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2013 to 2019, and empirically test the impact of financial technology on the development of big data industry and its mechanism using dynamic panel data model, mediating effect test method and threshold effect model. The benchmark regression results show that the regression coefficient of financial technology to big data industry is significantly positive at the significance level of 10%, indicating that the financial technology can directly promote the development of big data industry. The regression coefficient of the dynamic lag term of big data industry is negative, but not significant, indicating that the dynamic lag effect of big data industry is not obvious. The mediating effect test results show that the financial technology can indirectly promote the development of big data industry by alleviating the big data enterprise financing constraints. The big data enterprise financing constraints have a partial mediating effect, and the mediating effect account for 27.63% of the total effect. In addition, the threshold effect test results show that the direct effect of financial technology on big data industry is significantly enhanced when the development level of financial technology is higher than 5.8790, that is, there is a positive threshold effect of financial technology directly promoting the development of big data industry. However, the indirect effect of financial technology on big data industry is relatively weak when the development level of financial technology is higher than 5.4328, that is, financial technology indirectly promotes the development of big data industry by alleviating the big data enterprise financing constraints, which has a negative threshold effect.","PeriodicalId":31887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Technology, Big Data Enterprise Financing Constraints and Big Data Industry Development: Empirical Analysis Based on Mediating Effect and Threshold Effect\",\"authors\":\"Mu Zhang, Cheng-Fu Cao, Zhiyuan Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.54560/jracr.v11i4.309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on theoretical analysis, we select the relevant data of 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2013 to 2019, and empirically test the impact of financial technology on the development of big data industry and its mechanism using dynamic panel data model, mediating effect test method and threshold effect model. The benchmark regression results show that the regression coefficient of financial technology to big data industry is significantly positive at the significance level of 10%, indicating that the financial technology can directly promote the development of big data industry. The regression coefficient of the dynamic lag term of big data industry is negative, but not significant, indicating that the dynamic lag effect of big data industry is not obvious. The mediating effect test results show that the financial technology can indirectly promote the development of big data industry by alleviating the big data enterprise financing constraints. The big data enterprise financing constraints have a partial mediating effect, and the mediating effect account for 27.63% of the total effect. In addition, the threshold effect test results show that the direct effect of financial technology on big data industry is significantly enhanced when the development level of financial technology is higher than 5.8790, that is, there is a positive threshold effect of financial technology directly promoting the development of big data industry. However, the indirect effect of financial technology on big data industry is relatively weak when the development level of financial technology is higher than 5.4328, that is, financial technology indirectly promotes the development of big data industry by alleviating the big data enterprise financing constraints, which has a negative threshold effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v11i4.309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v11i4.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在理论分析的基础上,选取2013 - 2019年中国30个省(区、市)的相关数据,运用动态面板数据模型、中介效应检验方法和阈值效应模型,实证检验金融科技对大数据产业发展的影响及其机制。基准回归结果显示,金融科技对大数据产业的回归系数在10%的显著性水平下为显著正,表明金融科技可以直接促进大数据产业的发展。大数据产业动态滞后项的回归系数为负,但不显著,说明大数据产业的动态滞后效应不明显。中介效应检验结果表明,金融科技可以通过缓解大数据企业融资约束,间接促进大数据产业的发展。大数据企业融资约束具有部分中介效应,中介效应占总效应的27.63%。此外,门槛效应检验结果显示,当金融科技发展水平高于5.8790时,金融科技对大数据产业的直接效应显著增强,即金融科技直接促进大数据产业发展存在正向门槛效应。而当金融科技发展水平高于5.4328时,金融科技对大数据产业的间接效应相对较弱,即金融科技通过缓解大数据企业融资约束,间接促进了大数据产业的发展,具有负门槛效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial Technology, Big Data Enterprise Financing Constraints and Big Data Industry Development: Empirical Analysis Based on Mediating Effect and Threshold Effect
Based on theoretical analysis, we select the relevant data of 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2013 to 2019, and empirically test the impact of financial technology on the development of big data industry and its mechanism using dynamic panel data model, mediating effect test method and threshold effect model. The benchmark regression results show that the regression coefficient of financial technology to big data industry is significantly positive at the significance level of 10%, indicating that the financial technology can directly promote the development of big data industry. The regression coefficient of the dynamic lag term of big data industry is negative, but not significant, indicating that the dynamic lag effect of big data industry is not obvious. The mediating effect test results show that the financial technology can indirectly promote the development of big data industry by alleviating the big data enterprise financing constraints. The big data enterprise financing constraints have a partial mediating effect, and the mediating effect account for 27.63% of the total effect. In addition, the threshold effect test results show that the direct effect of financial technology on big data industry is significantly enhanced when the development level of financial technology is higher than 5.8790, that is, there is a positive threshold effect of financial technology directly promoting the development of big data industry. However, the indirect effect of financial technology on big data industry is relatively weak when the development level of financial technology is higher than 5.4328, that is, financial technology indirectly promotes the development of big data industry by alleviating the big data enterprise financing constraints, which has a negative threshold effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信