《西部妇女》苏·马西森著。爱丁堡:爱丁堡向上,2020年。360页,精装版$110.00。

IF 0.5 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Katarzyna Nowak-McNeice
{"title":"《西部妇女》苏·马西森著。爱丁堡:爱丁堡向上,2020年。360页,精装版$110.00。","authors":"Katarzyna Nowak-McNeice","doi":"10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University","PeriodicalId":44169,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","volume":"4 1","pages":"234 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WOMEN IN THE WESTERN Ed. Sue Matheson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2020. 360 pp. $110.00 hardcover.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Nowak-McNeice\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University\",\"PeriodicalId\":44169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"234 - 235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流媒体:这就是当杰克逊的短篇小说成为Netflix的财产时发生的事情。为了填满数小时的节目,《鬼屋惊魂》需要大大扩展;为了适应现有的模式,故事必须融入一定量的跳跃恐惧和《怪奇物语》式的悬念;为了吸引观众再次放映,它需要大量吸引网页的彩蛋(你好,Russ Tamblyn!)事实上,更透明的Netflix会直接使用这本书的书名。这个问题已经超出了对这个系列缺乏忠实度的抱怨,或者错误地主张回到那些贫瘠的“忠实”适应研究的日子。如果能有更多关于netflix和其他流媒体服务联合的文章,我们会很欢迎(但请注意,本书并不谴责这样的讨论)。像弗拉纳根这样的艺术家和观众似乎可以顺应流媒体文化的要求,或者完全放弃新的视听媒体。不仅仅是杰克逊的粉丝、亨利·詹姆斯(Henry James)的粉丝或英语教授们担心,未来充斥着更像《曼达洛人》(2019 -)的文学改编作品,而不是看似每年一度的BBC版奥斯汀小说。或者,尽管奥斯汀的作品在僵尸入侵中幸存了下来,我们必须为下一部《傲慢与偏见》中的婴儿尤达礼物感到高兴吗?Paul N. Reinsch德克萨斯理工大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WOMEN IN THE WESTERN Ed. Sue Matheson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2020. 360 pp. $110.00 hardcover.
streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION
JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: How did Casablanca affect the home front during World War II? What is the postfeminist significance of Buffy the Vampire Slayer? The Journal of Popular Film and Television answers such far-ranging questions by using the methods of popular culture studies to examine commercial film and television, historical and contemporary. Articles discuss networks, genres, series, and audiences, as well as celebrity stars, directors, and studios. Regular features include essays on the social and cultural background of films and television programs, filmographies, bibliographies, and commissioned book and video reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信