{"title":"《西部妇女》苏·马西森著。爱丁堡:爱丁堡向上,2020年。360页,精装版$110.00。","authors":"Katarzyna Nowak-McNeice","doi":"10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University","PeriodicalId":44169,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","volume":"4 1","pages":"234 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WOMEN IN THE WESTERN Ed. Sue Matheson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2020. 360 pp. $110.00 hardcover.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Nowak-McNeice\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University\",\"PeriodicalId\":44169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"234 - 235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
流媒体:这就是当杰克逊的短篇小说成为Netflix的财产时发生的事情。为了填满数小时的节目,《鬼屋惊魂》需要大大扩展;为了适应现有的模式,故事必须融入一定量的跳跃恐惧和《怪奇物语》式的悬念;为了吸引观众再次放映,它需要大量吸引网页的彩蛋(你好,Russ Tamblyn!)事实上,更透明的Netflix会直接使用这本书的书名。这个问题已经超出了对这个系列缺乏忠实度的抱怨,或者错误地主张回到那些贫瘠的“忠实”适应研究的日子。如果能有更多关于netflix和其他流媒体服务联合的文章,我们会很欢迎(但请注意,本书并不谴责这样的讨论)。像弗拉纳根这样的艺术家和观众似乎可以顺应流媒体文化的要求,或者完全放弃新的视听媒体。不仅仅是杰克逊的粉丝、亨利·詹姆斯(Henry James)的粉丝或英语教授们担心,未来充斥着更像《曼达洛人》(2019 -)的文学改编作品,而不是看似每年一度的BBC版奥斯汀小说。或者,尽管奥斯汀的作品在僵尸入侵中幸存了下来,我们必须为下一部《傲慢与偏见》中的婴儿尤达礼物感到高兴吗?Paul N. Reinsch德克萨斯理工大学
WOMEN IN THE WESTERN Ed. Sue Matheson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2020. 360 pp. $110.00 hardcover.
streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University
期刊介绍:
How did Casablanca affect the home front during World War II? What is the postfeminist significance of Buffy the Vampire Slayer? The Journal of Popular Film and Television answers such far-ranging questions by using the methods of popular culture studies to examine commercial film and television, historical and contemporary. Articles discuss networks, genres, series, and audiences, as well as celebrity stars, directors, and studios. Regular features include essays on the social and cultural background of films and television programs, filmographies, bibliographies, and commissioned book and video reviews.