泡沫固井技术在澳大利亚煤层气作业中的应用

T. Saunders, A. Shaban, Mohammad Zaman
{"title":"泡沫固井技术在澳大利亚煤层气作业中的应用","authors":"T. Saunders, A. Shaban, Mohammad Zaman","doi":"10.2118/191892-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Australian coal seam gas (CSG)/coal bed methane (CBM) fields present multiple challenges (i.e., losses, naturally fractured formations, and highly depleted zones) typically addressed using various well design and cementing techniques (i.e., additional casing strings, stage cementers/tools, lost-circulation materials, lightweight designs, and additional cement volume) to manage the potential risk of losses.\n Foamed cement is a viable option to address these challenges; however, despite the documented benefits, its application within Australia has been minimal at best. The lack of application can be primarily attributed to misconceptions concerning cost, potential risk, excessive equipment footprint, and a limited proven track record, which increases the potential risk of execution.\n A recent 10-well campaign conducted within the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia, demonstrated that foamed cement can be used as an alternative to traditional lightweight and/or elastomeric cement slurries. Further, the benefits of foamed cement make it an economically and technically advantageous solution compared to conventional cementing techniques used to overcome CSG challenges.\n This case study details the campaign challenges, cement design, and detailed results of the 10 wells with the intention of providing other engineers a road map to better understand foamed cementing with a specific Australian context and how it could be applied to their projects.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foam Cementing in Australian Coal Seam Gas Operations\",\"authors\":\"T. Saunders, A. Shaban, Mohammad Zaman\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191892-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Australian coal seam gas (CSG)/coal bed methane (CBM) fields present multiple challenges (i.e., losses, naturally fractured formations, and highly depleted zones) typically addressed using various well design and cementing techniques (i.e., additional casing strings, stage cementers/tools, lost-circulation materials, lightweight designs, and additional cement volume) to manage the potential risk of losses.\\n Foamed cement is a viable option to address these challenges; however, despite the documented benefits, its application within Australia has been minimal at best. The lack of application can be primarily attributed to misconceptions concerning cost, potential risk, excessive equipment footprint, and a limited proven track record, which increases the potential risk of execution.\\n A recent 10-well campaign conducted within the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia, demonstrated that foamed cement can be used as an alternative to traditional lightweight and/or elastomeric cement slurries. Further, the benefits of foamed cement make it an economically and technically advantageous solution compared to conventional cementing techniques used to overcome CSG challenges.\\n This case study details the campaign challenges, cement design, and detailed results of the 10 wells with the intention of providing other engineers a road map to better understand foamed cementing with a specific Australian context and how it could be applied to their projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191892-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191892-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚煤层气(CSG)/煤层气(CBM)油田面临多重挑战(即漏失、天然裂缝地层和高度枯竭区),通常采用各种井设计和固井技术(即额外的套管柱、一级固井剂/工具、漏失材料、轻量化设计和额外的水泥体积)来管理潜在的漏失风险。泡沫水泥是解决这些挑战的可行选择;然而,尽管有记录在案的好处,它在澳大利亚的应用最多是最少的。缺乏应用的主要原因可能是对成本、潜在风险、过多的设备占用空间和有限的已证明的跟踪记录的误解,这增加了执行的潜在风险。最近在澳大利亚昆士兰州Bowen盆地进行的10口井试验表明,泡沫水泥可以替代传统的轻质和/或弹性水泥浆。此外,与传统固井技术相比,泡沫水泥的优点使其成为一种经济和技术上的优势解决方案,用于克服CSG挑战。本案例研究详细介绍了作业挑战、水泥设计以及10口井的详细结果,旨在为其他工程师提供路线图,以便更好地了解泡沫固井在澳大利亚的具体情况,以及如何将其应用到他们的项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foam Cementing in Australian Coal Seam Gas Operations
The Australian coal seam gas (CSG)/coal bed methane (CBM) fields present multiple challenges (i.e., losses, naturally fractured formations, and highly depleted zones) typically addressed using various well design and cementing techniques (i.e., additional casing strings, stage cementers/tools, lost-circulation materials, lightweight designs, and additional cement volume) to manage the potential risk of losses. Foamed cement is a viable option to address these challenges; however, despite the documented benefits, its application within Australia has been minimal at best. The lack of application can be primarily attributed to misconceptions concerning cost, potential risk, excessive equipment footprint, and a limited proven track record, which increases the potential risk of execution. A recent 10-well campaign conducted within the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia, demonstrated that foamed cement can be used as an alternative to traditional lightweight and/or elastomeric cement slurries. Further, the benefits of foamed cement make it an economically and technically advantageous solution compared to conventional cementing techniques used to overcome CSG challenges. This case study details the campaign challenges, cement design, and detailed results of the 10 wells with the intention of providing other engineers a road map to better understand foamed cementing with a specific Australian context and how it could be applied to their projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信