中国250家医院对全身性毒性的局麻输送和复苏的调查

Feng-xian Li, Huali Xu, Huimin Chen, Hong-Yi Lei, Zhi-Jian You, Xuefei Xu, Shi-Yuan Xu, Hong-Fei Zhang
{"title":"中国250家医院对全身性毒性的局麻输送和复苏的调查","authors":"Feng-xian Li, Huali Xu, Huimin Chen, Hong-Yi Lei, Zhi-Jian You, Xuefei Xu, Shi-Yuan Xu, Hong-Fei Zhang","doi":"10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The optimized procedures for local anesthetic (LA) delivery and resuscitation for LA systemic toxicity (LAST) have improved the safety of regional anesthesia. Lipid emulsion (LE) has been the valid treatment for LAST. However, adoption of these revised procedures in developing countries remains unknown.Methods: We conducted a 17-question survey to access the basic knowledge of LA delivery, the practice procedures for LAST resuscitation and an overall understanding of LE usage in both academic and non-academic hospitals of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology.Results: A total of 250 hospitals completed the survey. Ropivacaine was the most preferred long-acting LA for regional anesthesia. Among the responders, 10 hospitals did not apply test-dosing before epidural anesthesia, including more non-academic than academic hospitals (7.1% versus 1.4%, P=0.0223). 77.5% (107/138) of academic hospitals and 69.6% (78/112) of non-academic hospitals had a protocol for LAST resuscitation. Only 28.2% of academic and 18.8% of non-academic hospitals stated LE preference for LAST. Furthermore, 17% (22/132) academic hospitals and 13% (12/89) non-academic hospitals chose the recommended epinephrine dosage based on the guideline of ARSA for LA-induced cardiac arrest. Significantly higher proportion (1.6 times more, 95% CI 1.082-3.991) of academic hospitals considered LE as the resuscitation method for LA-induced seizure than non-academic hospitals (44.9% versus 28.2%, P=0.0269). Finally, LE was available in only half of the hospitals which adopted its feasibility for LAST resuscitation.Conclusions: The survey revealed the poor practice procedures for regional anesthesia and non-standard use of LE for LAST resuscitation in China, especially among non-academic hospitals.  Citation: Feng-Xian Li, Hua-Li Xu, Hui-Qun Chen, Hong-Yi Lei, Zhi-Jian You, Xu-Zhong Xu, et al. Local anesthetic delivery and resuscitation for systemic toxicity in China: a survey of 250 hospitals. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; x: x-x. doi:10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":15018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Anesthetic Delivery and Resuscitation for Systemic Toxicity in China: A Survey of 250 Hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Feng-xian Li, Huali Xu, Huimin Chen, Hong-Yi Lei, Zhi-Jian You, Xuefei Xu, Shi-Yuan Xu, Hong-Fei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The optimized procedures for local anesthetic (LA) delivery and resuscitation for LA systemic toxicity (LAST) have improved the safety of regional anesthesia. Lipid emulsion (LE) has been the valid treatment for LAST. However, adoption of these revised procedures in developing countries remains unknown.Methods: We conducted a 17-question survey to access the basic knowledge of LA delivery, the practice procedures for LAST resuscitation and an overall understanding of LE usage in both academic and non-academic hospitals of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology.Results: A total of 250 hospitals completed the survey. Ropivacaine was the most preferred long-acting LA for regional anesthesia. Among the responders, 10 hospitals did not apply test-dosing before epidural anesthesia, including more non-academic than academic hospitals (7.1% versus 1.4%, P=0.0223). 77.5% (107/138) of academic hospitals and 69.6% (78/112) of non-academic hospitals had a protocol for LAST resuscitation. Only 28.2% of academic and 18.8% of non-academic hospitals stated LE preference for LAST. Furthermore, 17% (22/132) academic hospitals and 13% (12/89) non-academic hospitals chose the recommended epinephrine dosage based on the guideline of ARSA for LA-induced cardiac arrest. Significantly higher proportion (1.6 times more, 95% CI 1.082-3.991) of academic hospitals considered LE as the resuscitation method for LA-induced seizure than non-academic hospitals (44.9% versus 28.2%, P=0.0269). Finally, LE was available in only half of the hospitals which adopted its feasibility for LAST resuscitation.Conclusions: The survey revealed the poor practice procedures for regional anesthesia and non-standard use of LE for LAST resuscitation in China, especially among non-academic hospitals.  Citation: Feng-Xian Li, Hua-Li Xu, Hui-Qun Chen, Hong-Yi Lei, Zhi-Jian You, Xu-Zhong Xu, et al. Local anesthetic delivery and resuscitation for systemic toxicity in China: a survey of 250 hospitals. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; x: x-x. doi:10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"250-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:优化的局麻(LA)输送和LA全身毒性(LAST)复苏程序提高了区域麻醉的安全性。脂质乳(LE)是治疗乳糜泻的有效方法。但是,发展中国家是否通过这些订正程序仍不得而知。方法:通过17个问题的问卷调查,了解中国麻醉学会学术型和非学术型医院对LA分娩的基本知识、LAST复苏的实践程序以及对LE使用的总体了解。结果:共有250家医院完成调查。罗哌卡因是区域麻醉首选长效LA。在应答者中,有10家医院在硬膜外麻醉前未应用试验给药,其中非学术医院比学术医院更多(7.1%对1.4%,P=0.0223)。77.5%(107/138)的学术医院和69.6%(78/112)的非学术医院有LAST复苏方案。只有28.2%的学术医院和18.8%的非学术医院表示LE倾向于LAST。17%(22/132)的学术医院和13%(12/89)的非学术医院选择了基于ARSA指南的肾上腺素推荐剂量治疗la性心脏骤停。学术医院对la诱发癫痫采取LE复苏方法的比例显著高于非学术医院(44.9%比28.2%,P=0.0269) (95% CI 1.082 ~ 3.991, 1.6倍)。最后,只有一半的医院采用了LE作为LAST复苏的可行性。结论:调查显示中国区域麻醉实践程序不完善,LE在末次复苏中的应用不规范,特别是在非学术医院。引用本文:李凤先,徐华丽,陈慧群,雷红义,游之建,徐绪忠,等中国250家医院对全身性毒性的局麻输送和复苏的调查。中华外科杂志2017;x: x。doi:10.24015/ japm .2017.0021这是一篇开放获取的文章,由Evidence Based Communications (EBC)发表。本作品遵循知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议,允许以任何媒介或格式出于任何合法目的不受限制地使用、分发和复制。要查看此许可证的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local Anesthetic Delivery and Resuscitation for Systemic Toxicity in China: A Survey of 250 Hospitals
Background: The optimized procedures for local anesthetic (LA) delivery and resuscitation for LA systemic toxicity (LAST) have improved the safety of regional anesthesia. Lipid emulsion (LE) has been the valid treatment for LAST. However, adoption of these revised procedures in developing countries remains unknown.Methods: We conducted a 17-question survey to access the basic knowledge of LA delivery, the practice procedures for LAST resuscitation and an overall understanding of LE usage in both academic and non-academic hospitals of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology.Results: A total of 250 hospitals completed the survey. Ropivacaine was the most preferred long-acting LA for regional anesthesia. Among the responders, 10 hospitals did not apply test-dosing before epidural anesthesia, including more non-academic than academic hospitals (7.1% versus 1.4%, P=0.0223). 77.5% (107/138) of academic hospitals and 69.6% (78/112) of non-academic hospitals had a protocol for LAST resuscitation. Only 28.2% of academic and 18.8% of non-academic hospitals stated LE preference for LAST. Furthermore, 17% (22/132) academic hospitals and 13% (12/89) non-academic hospitals chose the recommended epinephrine dosage based on the guideline of ARSA for LA-induced cardiac arrest. Significantly higher proportion (1.6 times more, 95% CI 1.082-3.991) of academic hospitals considered LE as the resuscitation method for LA-induced seizure than non-academic hospitals (44.9% versus 28.2%, P=0.0269). Finally, LE was available in only half of the hospitals which adopted its feasibility for LAST resuscitation.Conclusions: The survey revealed the poor practice procedures for regional anesthesia and non-standard use of LE for LAST resuscitation in China, especially among non-academic hospitals.  Citation: Feng-Xian Li, Hua-Li Xu, Hui-Qun Chen, Hong-Yi Lei, Zhi-Jian You, Xu-Zhong Xu, et al. Local anesthetic delivery and resuscitation for systemic toxicity in China: a survey of 250 hospitals. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; x: x-x. doi:10.24015/JAPM.2017.0021This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信