非激素和激素宫内避孕:四个拉丁美洲国家患者观念的调查

A. Silva-Filho, J. Lira, A. Rocha, Marcia C. Ferreira, R. Lamaita, E. B. Cândido, M. Carneiro
{"title":"非激素和激素宫内避孕:四个拉丁美洲国家患者观念的调查","authors":"A. Silva-Filho, J. Lira, A. Rocha, Marcia C. Ferreira, R. Lamaita, E. B. Cândido, M. Carneiro","doi":"10.3109/13625187.2015.1137281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: This study sought to understand women’s perceived barriers to the use of hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine contraception in Latin America. Methods: We developed an online survey for women in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico who were seeking contraception. The questions aimed at evaluating patient awareness of negative stories and statements, as well as perceived barriers to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Results: The survey was mailed to 2300 women. A total of 1953 responses were received from Argentina (n = 465), Brazil (n = 380), Colombia (n = 613) and Mexico (n = 495). More women reported having heard negative stories about the copper IUD than about the LNG-IUS. More women believed that the copper IUD, rather than the LNG-IUS, was suitable only for those who had already had children. More women believed that weight gain (14.3% vs. 38.2%; p < 0.001), mood swings (14.1% vs. 38.7%; p < 0.001) and infertility (16.3% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.016) were possible side effects of the LNG-IUS. By contrast, more women believed that abortion (36% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001), pelvic infections (42.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001) and ectopic pregnancy (43.5% vs 23.5%; p < 0.001) were side effects more associated with the copper IUD. More believed the copper IUD was associated with less pain during placement and removal compared with the LNG-IUS (42.8% vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001). The perception of increased risk of contracting a sexual transmitted disease did not differ between the methods (IUD vs. LNG-IUS, 21.7% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.388). Conclusions: Respondents to a web-based survey in four Latin American countries have misperceptions regarding the adverse effects and risks of intrauterine contraception, which may hamper the use of these safe and efficient contraceptive methods. Education about the true risks and benefits involved is fundamental to improving patient acceptance and compliance as well as reducing unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"51 1","pages":"213 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-hormonal and hormonal intrauterine contraception: survey of patients’ perceptions in four Latin American countries\",\"authors\":\"A. Silva-Filho, J. Lira, A. Rocha, Marcia C. Ferreira, R. Lamaita, E. B. Cândido, M. Carneiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13625187.2015.1137281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objectives: This study sought to understand women’s perceived barriers to the use of hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine contraception in Latin America. Methods: We developed an online survey for women in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico who were seeking contraception. The questions aimed at evaluating patient awareness of negative stories and statements, as well as perceived barriers to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Results: The survey was mailed to 2300 women. A total of 1953 responses were received from Argentina (n = 465), Brazil (n = 380), Colombia (n = 613) and Mexico (n = 495). More women reported having heard negative stories about the copper IUD than about the LNG-IUS. More women believed that the copper IUD, rather than the LNG-IUS, was suitable only for those who had already had children. More women believed that weight gain (14.3% vs. 38.2%; p < 0.001), mood swings (14.1% vs. 38.7%; p < 0.001) and infertility (16.3% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.016) were possible side effects of the LNG-IUS. By contrast, more women believed that abortion (36% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001), pelvic infections (42.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001) and ectopic pregnancy (43.5% vs 23.5%; p < 0.001) were side effects more associated with the copper IUD. More believed the copper IUD was associated with less pain during placement and removal compared with the LNG-IUS (42.8% vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001). The perception of increased risk of contracting a sexual transmitted disease did not differ between the methods (IUD vs. LNG-IUS, 21.7% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.388). Conclusions: Respondents to a web-based survey in four Latin American countries have misperceptions regarding the adverse effects and risks of intrauterine contraception, which may hamper the use of these safe and efficient contraceptive methods. Education about the true risks and benefits involved is fundamental to improving patient acceptance and compliance as well as reducing unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"213 - 219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2015.1137281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2015.1137281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解拉丁美洲妇女对使用激素和非激素宫内避孕的感知障碍。方法:我们对阿根廷、巴西、哥伦比亚和墨西哥寻求避孕的妇女进行了一项在线调查。这些问题旨在评估患者对负面故事和陈述的认识,以及对铜质宫内节育器(IUD)和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统(LNG-IUS)的感知障碍。结果:该调查邮寄给了2300名女性。共收到1953份答复,分别来自阿根廷(n = 465)、巴西(n = 380)、哥伦比亚(n = 613)和墨西哥(n = 495)。与LNG-IUS相比,更多的女性报告听说过有关铜宫内节育器的负面报道。更多的妇女认为,铜宫内节育器,而不是LNG-IUS,只适合那些已经有过孩子的人。更多的女性认为体重增加(14.3% vs. 38.2%;P < 0.001),情绪波动(14.1%比38.7%;P < 0.001)和不孕症(16.3% vs. 19.9%;p = 0.016)为LNG-IUS可能的副作用。相比之下,更多的女性认为堕胎(36%对22.7%;P < 0.001),盆腔感染(42.1%比15.7%;P < 0.001)和异位妊娠(43.5% vs 23.5%;p < 0.001),副作用与铜宫内节育器相关。与LNG-IUS相比,更多的人认为铜宫内节育器在放置和取出过程中疼痛更少(42.8%对31.2%;p < 0.001)。对感染性传播疾病风险增加的感知在两种方法之间没有差异(IUD vs. LNG-IUS, 21.7% vs. 20.3%;p = 0.388)。结论:在四个拉丁美洲国家进行的一项基于网络的调查中,受访者对宫内避孕的不良反应和风险存在误解,这可能会阻碍这些安全有效的避孕方法的使用。关于所涉及的真正风险和益处的教育对于提高患者的接受度和依从性以及减少意外怀孕和不安全堕胎至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-hormonal and hormonal intrauterine contraception: survey of patients’ perceptions in four Latin American countries
ABSTRACT Objectives: This study sought to understand women’s perceived barriers to the use of hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine contraception in Latin America. Methods: We developed an online survey for women in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico who were seeking contraception. The questions aimed at evaluating patient awareness of negative stories and statements, as well as perceived barriers to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Results: The survey was mailed to 2300 women. A total of 1953 responses were received from Argentina (n = 465), Brazil (n = 380), Colombia (n = 613) and Mexico (n = 495). More women reported having heard negative stories about the copper IUD than about the LNG-IUS. More women believed that the copper IUD, rather than the LNG-IUS, was suitable only for those who had already had children. More women believed that weight gain (14.3% vs. 38.2%; p < 0.001), mood swings (14.1% vs. 38.7%; p < 0.001) and infertility (16.3% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.016) were possible side effects of the LNG-IUS. By contrast, more women believed that abortion (36% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001), pelvic infections (42.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001) and ectopic pregnancy (43.5% vs 23.5%; p < 0.001) were side effects more associated with the copper IUD. More believed the copper IUD was associated with less pain during placement and removal compared with the LNG-IUS (42.8% vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001). The perception of increased risk of contracting a sexual transmitted disease did not differ between the methods (IUD vs. LNG-IUS, 21.7% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.388). Conclusions: Respondents to a web-based survey in four Latin American countries have misperceptions regarding the adverse effects and risks of intrauterine contraception, which may hamper the use of these safe and efficient contraceptive methods. Education about the true risks and benefits involved is fundamental to improving patient acceptance and compliance as well as reducing unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信