理解基于K - 12能力的教育:2000年至2019年实施和结果研究的系统文献综述

Carla M. Evans, Erika Landl, Jeri Thompson
{"title":"理解基于K - 12能力的教育:2000年至2019年实施和结果研究的系统文献综述","authors":"Carla M. Evans, Erika Landl, Jeri Thompson","doi":"10.1002/CBE2.1228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence Carla M. Evans, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 31 Mount Vernon Street, Dover, NH 03820, New Hampshire. Email: cevans@nciea.org Abstract Background: Competency-based education (CBE) is a systems-change approach intended to re-shape traditional understandings of what, when, where, and how students learn and demonstrate academic knowledge and skills. Research on the factors that affect K-12 CBE implementation and the efficacy of different approaches has not yet been meticulously reviewed. Aims: The purpose of this literature review was to examine the research on K-12 CBE for factors that affect implementation, student outcomes, and the relationship between implementation and student outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted that included 25 peerreviewed studies and unpublished reports from 2000 to 2019 related to K-12 students. Results: Facilitators and barriers that affect K-12 CBE implementation were fairly consistent across studies. Factors perceived as barriers in some contexts were viewed as facilitators in others—it all depended on stage of implementation. Findings about the outcomes of CBE for K-12 students reflected mixed results with respect to claims that CBE implementation supports (a) academic achievement and progress; (b) intrinsic motivation and engagement; and (c) other important academic outcomes. Discussion: Undergirding all findings in this review is the difficulty of isolating the research on implementation and outcomes of K-12 CBE approaches in some “pure form.” It may make more sense for the field to coalesce around a common continuum of practices in relation to the key elements of CBE from more traditional models to more competency-based models. Also, assessment as a key feature of CB implementation was absent from most of the studies reviewed which is notable given that determining competence is fundamentally an assessment decision. Directions for future research are discussed. Conclusion: For many, the promise of CBE and related practices is that student achievement will improve and minimize equity gaps. This systematic review serves to amplify what is known about CBE approaches and what still needs investigation.","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making sense of K‐12 competency‐based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019\",\"authors\":\"Carla M. Evans, Erika Landl, Jeri Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/CBE2.1228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence Carla M. Evans, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 31 Mount Vernon Street, Dover, NH 03820, New Hampshire. Email: cevans@nciea.org Abstract Background: Competency-based education (CBE) is a systems-change approach intended to re-shape traditional understandings of what, when, where, and how students learn and demonstrate academic knowledge and skills. Research on the factors that affect K-12 CBE implementation and the efficacy of different approaches has not yet been meticulously reviewed. Aims: The purpose of this literature review was to examine the research on K-12 CBE for factors that affect implementation, student outcomes, and the relationship between implementation and student outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted that included 25 peerreviewed studies and unpublished reports from 2000 to 2019 related to K-12 students. Results: Facilitators and barriers that affect K-12 CBE implementation were fairly consistent across studies. Factors perceived as barriers in some contexts were viewed as facilitators in others—it all depended on stage of implementation. Findings about the outcomes of CBE for K-12 students reflected mixed results with respect to claims that CBE implementation supports (a) academic achievement and progress; (b) intrinsic motivation and engagement; and (c) other important academic outcomes. Discussion: Undergirding all findings in this review is the difficulty of isolating the research on implementation and outcomes of K-12 CBE approaches in some “pure form.” It may make more sense for the field to coalesce around a common continuum of practices in relation to the key elements of CBE from more traditional models to more competency-based models. Also, assessment as a key feature of CB implementation was absent from most of the studies reviewed which is notable given that determining competence is fundamentally an assessment decision. Directions for future research are discussed. Conclusion: For many, the promise of CBE and related practices is that student achievement will improve and minimize equity gaps. This systematic review serves to amplify what is known about CBE approaches and what still needs investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/CBE2.1228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/CBE2.1228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

卡拉·m·埃文斯,国家教育评估改进中心,弗农山街31号,多佛,NH 03820,新罕布什尔州。摘要背景:以能力为基础的教育(CBE)是一种系统变革方法,旨在重塑传统对学生学习和展示学术知识和技能的内容、时间、地点和方式的理解。影响K-12 CBE实施的因素和不同方法的效果的研究尚未得到仔细的审查。目的:本文献综述的目的是探讨影响K-12语文教育实施、学生成绩的因素,以及实施与学生成绩之间的关系。方法:对2000年至2019年与K-12学生相关的25项同行评议研究和未发表的报告进行系统文献综述。结果:影响K-12 CBE实施的促进因素和障碍在研究中是相当一致的。在某些情况下被视为障碍的因素在其他情况下被视为促进因素-这完全取决于实施阶段。关于对K-12学生实施文化商业教育的结果的调查结果反映了关于文化商业教育实施支持(a)学术成就和进步的说法的混合结果;(b)内在动机和参与;(c)其他重要的学术成果。讨论:本综述中所有发现的基础是很难将K-12 CBE方法的实施和结果以某种“纯粹形式”隔离开来。从更传统的模型到更基于能力的模型,围绕与CBE关键元素相关的共同连续实践进行合并,可能对该领域更有意义。此外,在审查的大多数研究中,评估作为CB实施的一个关键特征是缺失的,这是值得注意的,因为确定能力基本上是一个评估决策。讨论了今后的研究方向。结论:对于许多人来说,CBE和相关实践的承诺是提高学生的成绩并减少公平差距。这一系统综述有助于扩大关于CBE方法的已知内容和仍需研究的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making sense of K‐12 competency‐based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019
Correspondence Carla M. Evans, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 31 Mount Vernon Street, Dover, NH 03820, New Hampshire. Email: cevans@nciea.org Abstract Background: Competency-based education (CBE) is a systems-change approach intended to re-shape traditional understandings of what, when, where, and how students learn and demonstrate academic knowledge and skills. Research on the factors that affect K-12 CBE implementation and the efficacy of different approaches has not yet been meticulously reviewed. Aims: The purpose of this literature review was to examine the research on K-12 CBE for factors that affect implementation, student outcomes, and the relationship between implementation and student outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted that included 25 peerreviewed studies and unpublished reports from 2000 to 2019 related to K-12 students. Results: Facilitators and barriers that affect K-12 CBE implementation were fairly consistent across studies. Factors perceived as barriers in some contexts were viewed as facilitators in others—it all depended on stage of implementation. Findings about the outcomes of CBE for K-12 students reflected mixed results with respect to claims that CBE implementation supports (a) academic achievement and progress; (b) intrinsic motivation and engagement; and (c) other important academic outcomes. Discussion: Undergirding all findings in this review is the difficulty of isolating the research on implementation and outcomes of K-12 CBE approaches in some “pure form.” It may make more sense for the field to coalesce around a common continuum of practices in relation to the key elements of CBE from more traditional models to more competency-based models. Also, assessment as a key feature of CB implementation was absent from most of the studies reviewed which is notable given that determining competence is fundamentally an assessment decision. Directions for future research are discussed. Conclusion: For many, the promise of CBE and related practices is that student achievement will improve and minimize equity gaps. This systematic review serves to amplify what is known about CBE approaches and what still needs investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信