社论:中西医结合学科期刊同行评议

Mohammadreza Hojat , Steven Rosenzweig
{"title":"社论:中西医结合学科期刊同行评议","authors":"Mohammadreza Hojat ,&nbsp;Steven Rosenzweig","doi":"10.1016/j.sigm.2004.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Manuscript reviewers are described as the “gatekeepers of science” because they play an important role in dissemination of scientific information. Their responsibility is particularly great toward emergent fields such as integrative medicine that conduct investigations in a new research territory. In this editorial, we briefly describe several pitfalls that can impede reviewers’ impartial judgment and that appear particularly important in regard to manuscripts concerning complementary and alternative medicine and integrative medicine. We suggest that increasing reviewers’ awareness of the pitfalls can improve fairness in the peer review process. The ultimate responsibilities rest on the journal editors to ensure impartiality in the peer review process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101156,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Integrative Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sigm.2004.05.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Journal peer review in integrative medicine discipline\",\"authors\":\"Mohammadreza Hojat ,&nbsp;Steven Rosenzweig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sigm.2004.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Manuscript reviewers are described as the “gatekeepers of science” because they play an important role in dissemination of scientific information. Their responsibility is particularly great toward emergent fields such as integrative medicine that conduct investigations in a new research territory. In this editorial, we briefly describe several pitfalls that can impede reviewers’ impartial judgment and that appear particularly important in regard to manuscripts concerning complementary and alternative medicine and integrative medicine. We suggest that increasing reviewers’ awareness of the pitfalls can improve fairness in the peer review process. The ultimate responsibilities rest on the journal editors to ensure impartiality in the peer review process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sigm.2004.05.005\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543115004000250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543115004000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

论文审稿人被称为“科学的守门人”,因为他们在科学信息的传播中发挥着重要作用。他们的责任在新兴领域尤其重大,例如在新的研究领域进行调查的综合医学。在这篇社论中,我们简要地描述了几个可能阻碍审稿人公正判断的陷阱,这些陷阱在涉及补充和替代医学以及中西医结合医学的手稿中显得特别重要。我们建议提高审稿人对缺陷的认识可以提高同行评审过程中的公平性。期刊编辑的最终责任在于确保同行评议过程的公正性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial: Journal peer review in integrative medicine discipline

Manuscript reviewers are described as the “gatekeepers of science” because they play an important role in dissemination of scientific information. Their responsibility is particularly great toward emergent fields such as integrative medicine that conduct investigations in a new research territory. In this editorial, we briefly describe several pitfalls that can impede reviewers’ impartial judgment and that appear particularly important in regard to manuscripts concerning complementary and alternative medicine and integrative medicine. We suggest that increasing reviewers’ awareness of the pitfalls can improve fairness in the peer review process. The ultimate responsibilities rest on the journal editors to ensure impartiality in the peer review process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信