肾移植中诱导治疗的比较研究

Z. Guan, Jien-Wei Liu, L. Qian, L. Yin, Yan Tian
{"title":"肾移植中诱导治疗的比较研究","authors":"Z. Guan, Jien-Wei Liu, L. Qian, L. Yin, Yan Tian","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the efficacy and safety of two antibody induction therapies during donor after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation. \n \n \nMethods \nRetrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of DCD kidney patients in 2016. Patients using basiliximab monoclonal or thymoglobulin (ATG) polyclonal antibody were divided into two groups. Early postoperative biopsy proven, acute rejection rate, creatinine level and patient/graft survival rate were compared between two groups at 1, 3 or 6 month post-operation. \n \n \nResults \nBasiliximab (n=44) and ATG (n=60) was used as induction. No significant inter-group difference existed in donor age, primary disease, creatinine pre-donation, recipient age or cause of renal failure. And recipient male ratio and body weight were greater in ATG group than those in basiliximab group [87% vs. 55%; (70±13) vs. (64±12) kg]. Outcomes of basiliximab group showed acute rejection rate was 9%, average creatinine 112.4 at 1 month, 127.0 at 3 months and 107.8 at 6 months and total infection rate 16%. Graft/patient 6-month survival rates were 95%(42/44)and 98%(43/44). Outcomes of ATG group showed that acute rejection rate was 3%, average creatinine 135.6 at 1 month, 119.0 at 3 months and 118.0 at 6 months and total infection rate 22%. Graft/patient 6-month survival rates were both 100% (60/60). \n \n \nConclusions \nDuring DCD kidney transplantation, both induction therapies may prevent acute rejection immediately post-operation. No difference exists in acute rejection rate, infection rate, graft/recipient 6-month survival rate or graft function. These two inductions have an excellent early prognosis. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney transplantation; Monoclonal antibody; Acute rejection","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"68 1","pages":"419-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of induction therapy during kidney transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Z. Guan, Jien-Wei Liu, L. Qian, L. Yin, Yan Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the efficacy and safety of two antibody induction therapies during donor after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nRetrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of DCD kidney patients in 2016. Patients using basiliximab monoclonal or thymoglobulin (ATG) polyclonal antibody were divided into two groups. Early postoperative biopsy proven, acute rejection rate, creatinine level and patient/graft survival rate were compared between two groups at 1, 3 or 6 month post-operation. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nBasiliximab (n=44) and ATG (n=60) was used as induction. No significant inter-group difference existed in donor age, primary disease, creatinine pre-donation, recipient age or cause of renal failure. And recipient male ratio and body weight were greater in ATG group than those in basiliximab group [87% vs. 55%; (70±13) vs. (64±12) kg]. Outcomes of basiliximab group showed acute rejection rate was 9%, average creatinine 112.4 at 1 month, 127.0 at 3 months and 107.8 at 6 months and total infection rate 16%. Graft/patient 6-month survival rates were 95%(42/44)and 98%(43/44). Outcomes of ATG group showed that acute rejection rate was 3%, average creatinine 135.6 at 1 month, 119.0 at 3 months and 118.0 at 6 months and total infection rate 22%. Graft/patient 6-month survival rates were both 100% (60/60). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nDuring DCD kidney transplantation, both induction therapies may prevent acute rejection immediately post-operation. No difference exists in acute rejection rate, infection rate, graft/recipient 6-month survival rate or graft function. These two inductions have an excellent early prognosis. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nKidney transplantation; Monoclonal antibody; Acute rejection\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"419-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.07.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨心源性死亡(DCD)肾移植过程中两种抗体诱导治疗的有效性和安全性。方法对2016年DCD肾病患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。使用巴利昔单抗或胸腺球蛋白(ATG)多克隆抗体的患者分为两组。比较两组术后1、3、6个月的急性排斥反应率、肌酐水平和患者/移植物存活率。结果Basiliximab (n=44)和ATG (n=60)作为诱导物。供者年龄、原发疾病、捐献前肌酐、受体年龄、肾功能衰竭原因组间差异无统计学意义。ATG组接受者男性比例和体重高于basiliximab组[87%比55%;(70±13)vs(64±12)kg]。巴昔昔单抗组急性排斥率为9%,1个月平均肌酐112.4,3个月平均肌酐127.0,6个月平均肌酐107.8,总感染率为16%。移植物/患者6个月生存率分别为95%(42/44)和98%(43/44)。ATG组急性排斥反应率3%,1个月平均肌酐135.6,3个月平均肌酐119.0,6个月平均肌酐118.0,总感染率22%。移植/患者6个月生存率均为100%(60/60)。结论在DCD肾移植中,两种诱导疗法均可预防术后即刻急性排斥反应。急性排异率、感染率、移植/受者6个月存活率和移植物功能无差异。这两种诱导有很好的早期预后。关键词:肾移植;单克隆抗体;急性排斥反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of induction therapy during kidney transplantation
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of two antibody induction therapies during donor after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of DCD kidney patients in 2016. Patients using basiliximab monoclonal or thymoglobulin (ATG) polyclonal antibody were divided into two groups. Early postoperative biopsy proven, acute rejection rate, creatinine level and patient/graft survival rate were compared between two groups at 1, 3 or 6 month post-operation. Results Basiliximab (n=44) and ATG (n=60) was used as induction. No significant inter-group difference existed in donor age, primary disease, creatinine pre-donation, recipient age or cause of renal failure. And recipient male ratio and body weight were greater in ATG group than those in basiliximab group [87% vs. 55%; (70±13) vs. (64±12) kg]. Outcomes of basiliximab group showed acute rejection rate was 9%, average creatinine 112.4 at 1 month, 127.0 at 3 months and 107.8 at 6 months and total infection rate 16%. Graft/patient 6-month survival rates were 95%(42/44)and 98%(43/44). Outcomes of ATG group showed that acute rejection rate was 3%, average creatinine 135.6 at 1 month, 119.0 at 3 months and 118.0 at 6 months and total infection rate 22%. Graft/patient 6-month survival rates were both 100% (60/60). Conclusions During DCD kidney transplantation, both induction therapies may prevent acute rejection immediately post-operation. No difference exists in acute rejection rate, infection rate, graft/recipient 6-month survival rate or graft function. These two inductions have an excellent early prognosis. Key words: Kidney transplantation; Monoclonal antibody; Acute rejection
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信