用分离逻辑验证并联回路

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
S. Blom, Saeed Darabi, M. Huisman
{"title":"用分离逻辑验证并联回路","authors":"S. Blom, Saeed Darabi, M. Huisman","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.155.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a technique to specify and verify whether a loop can be parallelised. Our approach can be used as an additional step in a parallelising compiler to verify user annotations about loop dependences. Essentially, our technique requires each loop iteration to be specified with the locations it will read and write. From the loop iteration specifications, the loop (in)dependences can be derived. Moreover, the loop iteration specifications also reveal where synchronisation is needed in the parallelised program. The loop iteration specifications can be verified using permission-based separation logic.","PeriodicalId":53164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historic Buildings and Places","volume":"18 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying Parallel Loops with Separation Logic\",\"authors\":\"S. Blom, Saeed Darabi, M. Huisman\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.155.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a technique to specify and verify whether a loop can be parallelised. Our approach can be used as an additional step in a parallelising compiler to verify user annotations about loop dependences. Essentially, our technique requires each loop iteration to be specified with the locations it will read and write. From the loop iteration specifications, the loop (in)dependences can be derived. Moreover, the loop iteration specifications also reveal where synchronisation is needed in the parallelised program. The loop iteration specifications can be verified using permission-based separation logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historic Buildings and Places\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historic Buildings and Places\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.155.7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historic Buildings and Places","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.155.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文提出了一种技术来指定和验证一个循环是否可以并行化。我们的方法可以作为并行编译器的附加步骤来验证关于循环依赖的用户注释。本质上,我们的技术要求每个循环迭代都指定它将读取和写入的位置。从循环迭代规范中,可以推导出循环依赖关系。此外,循环迭代规范还揭示了并行程序中需要同步的地方。循环迭代规范可以使用基于权限的分离逻辑进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verifying Parallel Loops with Separation Logic
This paper proposes a technique to specify and verify whether a loop can be parallelised. Our approach can be used as an additional step in a parallelising compiler to verify user annotations about loop dependences. Essentially, our technique requires each loop iteration to be specified with the locations it will read and write. From the loop iteration specifications, the loop (in)dependences can be derived. Moreover, the loop iteration specifications also reveal where synchronisation is needed in the parallelised program. The loop iteration specifications can be verified using permission-based separation logic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信