南盟国家的卫生支出、卫生基础设施和卫生状况:面板数据分析

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Vikalpa Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1177/02560909221113382
Subhalaxmi Mohapatra
{"title":"南盟国家的卫生支出、卫生基础设施和卫生状况:面板数据分析","authors":"Subhalaxmi Mohapatra","doi":"10.1177/02560909221113382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars in health economics have been studying the relationship between healthcare expenditure and health outcomes for the last half-century. Researchers emphasized the increase of public health expenditure towards providing primary healthcare based on the logic that health expenditure has a direct effect on the health outcomes of the people. However, such studies have a lot of inconsistencies. Given the background, the present study has three research objectives. First, to investigate the effect of healthcare spending on multiple health outcomes in SAARC nations after controlling for country-specific health infrastructures and economic conditions. Second, to undertake a differential analysis of the effect of public and private healthcare spending (both aggregate and out of pocket) on specific health outcomes. Third, to explore the presence (if any) of the differential effect of health expenditure and health infrastructure variables on specific health outcome variables, including mortality and morbidity indicators. Based on a 20-year (1993–2012) panel data from seven SAARC countries, health expenditure was found to influence improved health outcomes in SAARC nations. In addition, the differential effect of public, private and out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure was observed on different health outcomes. Thus, OOP expenditures was found to be the major influencer of life expectancy, death rate and TB instances, while public expenditure was found to be influential for improving infant mortality rate (IMR). The present study supports the notion that disaggregated effects of health expenditure (by including the effect of public, private and OOP expenditures) are needed to get a complete understanding of the health expenditure–health outcome linkage. In addition, the findings emphasize on the role of proximal predictors of health outcomes (alongside expenditure variables in the same model) as important inclusion in the health expenditure-health outcome investigation.","PeriodicalId":35878,"journal":{"name":"Vikalpa","volume":"28 1","pages":"205 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Expenditures, Health Infrastructure and Health Status in SAARC Countries: A Panel Data Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Subhalaxmi Mohapatra\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02560909221113382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholars in health economics have been studying the relationship between healthcare expenditure and health outcomes for the last half-century. Researchers emphasized the increase of public health expenditure towards providing primary healthcare based on the logic that health expenditure has a direct effect on the health outcomes of the people. However, such studies have a lot of inconsistencies. Given the background, the present study has three research objectives. First, to investigate the effect of healthcare spending on multiple health outcomes in SAARC nations after controlling for country-specific health infrastructures and economic conditions. Second, to undertake a differential analysis of the effect of public and private healthcare spending (both aggregate and out of pocket) on specific health outcomes. Third, to explore the presence (if any) of the differential effect of health expenditure and health infrastructure variables on specific health outcome variables, including mortality and morbidity indicators. Based on a 20-year (1993–2012) panel data from seven SAARC countries, health expenditure was found to influence improved health outcomes in SAARC nations. In addition, the differential effect of public, private and out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure was observed on different health outcomes. Thus, OOP expenditures was found to be the major influencer of life expectancy, death rate and TB instances, while public expenditure was found to be influential for improving infant mortality rate (IMR). The present study supports the notion that disaggregated effects of health expenditure (by including the effect of public, private and OOP expenditures) are needed to get a complete understanding of the health expenditure–health outcome linkage. In addition, the findings emphasize on the role of proximal predictors of health outcomes (alongside expenditure variables in the same model) as important inclusion in the health expenditure-health outcome investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vikalpa\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vikalpa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909221113382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vikalpa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909221113382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的半个世纪里,卫生经济学学者一直在研究卫生保健支出与健康结果之间的关系。研究人员认为,公共卫生支出对国民的健康状况有直接影响,因此强调了增加初级卫生保健公共卫生支出的必要性。然而,这些研究有很多不一致之处。在此背景下,本研究有三个研究目标。首先,在控制了特定国家的卫生基础设施和经济条件后,研究了南盟国家卫生保健支出对多种健康结果的影响。其次,对公共和私人医疗支出(包括总支出和自费支出)对具体健康结果的影响进行差异分析。第三,探讨卫生支出和卫生基础设施变量对具体健康结果变量(包括死亡率和发病率指标)的差异效应(如果有的话)。根据7个南盟国家20年(1993-2012年)的小组数据,发现卫生支出影响了南盟国家健康状况的改善。此外,还观察到公共、私人和自费(OOP)卫生支出对不同健康结果的不同影响。因此,发现OOP支出是预期寿命、死亡率和结核病病例的主要影响因素,而发现公共支出对改善婴儿死亡率(IMR)有影响。本研究支持这样一种观点,即需要卫生支出的分类效应(包括公共、私人和OOP支出的影响),才能全面了解卫生支出与卫生结果之间的联系。此外,研究结果强调了健康结果的近距离预测因子(与同一模型中的支出变量一起)作为健康支出-健康结果调查的重要内容的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Expenditures, Health Infrastructure and Health Status in SAARC Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
Scholars in health economics have been studying the relationship between healthcare expenditure and health outcomes for the last half-century. Researchers emphasized the increase of public health expenditure towards providing primary healthcare based on the logic that health expenditure has a direct effect on the health outcomes of the people. However, such studies have a lot of inconsistencies. Given the background, the present study has three research objectives. First, to investigate the effect of healthcare spending on multiple health outcomes in SAARC nations after controlling for country-specific health infrastructures and economic conditions. Second, to undertake a differential analysis of the effect of public and private healthcare spending (both aggregate and out of pocket) on specific health outcomes. Third, to explore the presence (if any) of the differential effect of health expenditure and health infrastructure variables on specific health outcome variables, including mortality and morbidity indicators. Based on a 20-year (1993–2012) panel data from seven SAARC countries, health expenditure was found to influence improved health outcomes in SAARC nations. In addition, the differential effect of public, private and out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure was observed on different health outcomes. Thus, OOP expenditures was found to be the major influencer of life expectancy, death rate and TB instances, while public expenditure was found to be influential for improving infant mortality rate (IMR). The present study supports the notion that disaggregated effects of health expenditure (by including the effect of public, private and OOP expenditures) are needed to get a complete understanding of the health expenditure–health outcome linkage. In addition, the findings emphasize on the role of proximal predictors of health outcomes (alongside expenditure variables in the same model) as important inclusion in the health expenditure-health outcome investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vikalpa
Vikalpa Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信