组织弹性:公共管理者在剧烈变化中为确保持续实现目标所做的工作

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
C. S. Lund, Line Hvilsted, H. Salomonsen, L. B. Andersen
{"title":"组织弹性:公共管理者在剧烈变化中为确保持续实现目标所做的工作","authors":"C. S. Lund, Line Hvilsted, H. Salomonsen, L. B. Andersen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v53i4.130521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public organizations must keep attaining their goals during changes, and the concept of organizational resilience describes this ability. The article examines public managers’ leadership behaviors focused on promoting organizational resilience during drastic changes. Based on 24 interviews with public managers and professionals who worked with public health and elderly care during the Covid-19 pandemic, we shed light on four leadership behaviors aimed at ensuring organizational resilience: setting direction, supporting relations, facilitating reflections, and clarifying the rules of the game. We find that public managers particularly set direction by balancing opposing considerations in the daily work, and that their support of relations includes both employees and citizens. The managers facilitate opportunities to reflect differently with variation in whether they initiate and/or participate in the reflection process themselves. The rules of the game are changed toward either leader-centrism or self-governance (away from decision-making with both leader and employee participation). The four types of leadership behaviors are interrelated and interact with established types of leadership behaviors.","PeriodicalId":40761,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Politica","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational resilience: What public managers do to ensure continued goal attainment during drastic changes\",\"authors\":\"C. S. Lund, Line Hvilsted, H. Salomonsen, L. B. Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/politica.v53i4.130521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public organizations must keep attaining their goals during changes, and the concept of organizational resilience describes this ability. The article examines public managers’ leadership behaviors focused on promoting organizational resilience during drastic changes. Based on 24 interviews with public managers and professionals who worked with public health and elderly care during the Covid-19 pandemic, we shed light on four leadership behaviors aimed at ensuring organizational resilience: setting direction, supporting relations, facilitating reflections, and clarifying the rules of the game. We find that public managers particularly set direction by balancing opposing considerations in the daily work, and that their support of relations includes both employees and citizens. The managers facilitate opportunities to reflect differently with variation in whether they initiate and/or participate in the reflection process themselves. The rules of the game are changed toward either leader-centrism or self-governance (away from decision-making with both leader and employee participation). The four types of leadership behaviors are interrelated and interact with established types of leadership behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofia Politica\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i4.130521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i4.130521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共组织必须在变革中不断实现其目标,组织弹性的概念描述了这种能力。本文考察了公共管理者在剧烈变化中促进组织弹性的领导行为。基于对24位在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间从事公共卫生和老年人护理工作的公共管理人员和专业人士的采访,我们揭示了旨在确保组织弹性的四种领导行为:确定方向、支持关系、促进反思和澄清游戏规则。我们发现,公共管理者尤其通过平衡日常工作中的对立考虑来确定方向,他们对关系的支持包括员工和公民。管理者促进机会,以不同的方式反映是否他们自己发起和/或参与反思过程的变化。游戏规则要么转向以领导者为中心,要么转向自我管理(远离领导者和员工共同参与的决策)。这四种类型的领导行为是相互关联的,并与已建立的领导行为类型相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational resilience: What public managers do to ensure continued goal attainment during drastic changes
Public organizations must keep attaining their goals during changes, and the concept of organizational resilience describes this ability. The article examines public managers’ leadership behaviors focused on promoting organizational resilience during drastic changes. Based on 24 interviews with public managers and professionals who worked with public health and elderly care during the Covid-19 pandemic, we shed light on four leadership behaviors aimed at ensuring organizational resilience: setting direction, supporting relations, facilitating reflections, and clarifying the rules of the game. We find that public managers particularly set direction by balancing opposing considerations in the daily work, and that their support of relations includes both employees and citizens. The managers facilitate opportunities to reflect differently with variation in whether they initiate and/or participate in the reflection process themselves. The rules of the game are changed toward either leader-centrism or self-governance (away from decision-making with both leader and employee participation). The four types of leadership behaviors are interrelated and interact with established types of leadership behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Filosofia Politica
Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信