文理是一种知识

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
V. Hess
{"title":"文理是一种知识","authors":"V. Hess","doi":"10.25162/MHJ-2020-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can general conclusions be obtained from particular observations – and how can doctors deduce the necessary individual treatment of a patient from such generalizations, rules or laws? This is the central question of every scientific medicine. Today, statistical metaanalyses promise evidence-based medicine, in earlier times many trusted the genius of a philosophical physician, and in the early modern era, hundreds of observations bound together should show the right methodus medendi . However, there is one of the oldest literary genres hardly discussed in historiography or medical practice: The aphorism which has experienced a remarkable conjunction in the early 18th century in the form of tabular observations. This article shows how the knowledge of aphorism, condensed into short sentences, relates to other forms of medical reasoning and action. The aphoristic way of knowing cannot be understood as a peculiar element of Neohippocratism at that time, as the example of meteorological medicine demonstrates. Instead, the paper will argue that the aphorism represents an independent form of medical knowledge that condenses empirical experiences to knowing of action-related maxims and rules.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"590 1","pages":"102-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Aphorismus als Wissenstechnik\",\"authors\":\"V. Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/MHJ-2020-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How can general conclusions be obtained from particular observations – and how can doctors deduce the necessary individual treatment of a patient from such generalizations, rules or laws? This is the central question of every scientific medicine. Today, statistical metaanalyses promise evidence-based medicine, in earlier times many trusted the genius of a philosophical physician, and in the early modern era, hundreds of observations bound together should show the right methodus medendi . However, there is one of the oldest literary genres hardly discussed in historiography or medical practice: The aphorism which has experienced a remarkable conjunction in the early 18th century in the form of tabular observations. This article shows how the knowledge of aphorism, condensed into short sentences, relates to other forms of medical reasoning and action. The aphoristic way of knowing cannot be understood as a peculiar element of Neohippocratism at that time, as the example of meteorological medicine demonstrates. Instead, the paper will argue that the aphorism represents an independent form of medical knowledge that condenses empirical experiences to knowing of action-related maxims and rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"volume\":\"590 1\",\"pages\":\"102-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/MHJ-2020-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/MHJ-2020-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

如何从特定的观察中得出一般的结论?医生如何从这些概括、规则或规律中推断出对病人必要的个体化治疗?这是所有科学医学的中心问题。今天,统计荟萃分析带来了循证医学的希望,在早些时候,许多人相信一位哲学医生的天才,在现代早期,数百项观察结合在一起应该会显示出正确的医学方法。然而,有一种最古老的文学体裁在史学或医学实践中几乎没有被讨论过:格言在18世纪早期以表格观察的形式经历了一次显著的结合。这篇文章展示了格言的知识,浓缩成短句,是如何与其他形式的医学推理和行动联系起来的。正如气象医学的例子所表明的那样,警句式的认知方式不能被理解为当时新希波克拉底主义的一种特殊元素。相反,本文将争辩说,格言代表了一种独立的医学知识形式,它将经验经验浓缩为对与行动有关的格言和规则的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Der Aphorismus als Wissenstechnik
How can general conclusions be obtained from particular observations – and how can doctors deduce the necessary individual treatment of a patient from such generalizations, rules or laws? This is the central question of every scientific medicine. Today, statistical metaanalyses promise evidence-based medicine, in earlier times many trusted the genius of a philosophical physician, and in the early modern era, hundreds of observations bound together should show the right methodus medendi . However, there is one of the oldest literary genres hardly discussed in historiography or medical practice: The aphorism which has experienced a remarkable conjunction in the early 18th century in the form of tabular observations. This article shows how the knowledge of aphorism, condensed into short sentences, relates to other forms of medical reasoning and action. The aphoristic way of knowing cannot be understood as a peculiar element of Neohippocratism at that time, as the example of meteorological medicine demonstrates. Instead, the paper will argue that the aphorism represents an independent form of medical knowledge that condenses empirical experiences to knowing of action-related maxims and rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medizinhistorisches Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信