脑瘫患者的髋关节放射学指标与GMFCS I级和GMFM-66评分相关

Anatomy Pub Date : 2019-04-29 DOI:10.2399/ANA.19.018
Özlem Elvan, Mert Keskinbora, Havva Didem Çelikcan, A. Bobuş, A. Özgür, Mustafa Kömür, Zeliha Kurtoğlu Olgunus
{"title":"脑瘫患者的髋关节放射学指标与GMFCS I级和GMFM-66评分相关","authors":"Özlem Elvan, Mert Keskinbora, Havva Didem Çelikcan, A. Bobuş, A. Özgür, Mustafa Kömür, Zeliha Kurtoğlu Olgunus","doi":"10.2399/ANA.19.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the certain radiological hip parameters and the effects of these parameters on the functional capacity of cerebral palsy (CP) children, to compare the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 scores) of hemiparetic and diparetic children with spastic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level 1, and to define possible differences or similarities with the control group. Methods: The radiographic parameters measured for CP and control groups were caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD), migration index (MI), center edge angle (CEA), acetabular index (AI) and pelvic obliquity. The functional capacity of the CP group was assessed by GMFM-66. Results: No significant differences were found in terms of sides of the same individual in each group. Significant differences were found between groups for left CCD, right MI, right and left AI, and right and left CEA. Correlation analyses revealed significant relationships between radiological parameters. Hemiparetics had statistically higher GMFM-66 dimension E score than diparetics. Conclusion: The threshold values for hip parameters were determined with CP in GMFCS level 1. The hemiparetic and diparetic children with CP, who were at the GMFCS level I and age group, had similar hip morphology. Development of femoral head and acetabulum in these children were not different from control group. Evaluating the functional levels of patients according to GMFM-66 scores with radiographic parameters is believed to contribute to the monitoring CP children.","PeriodicalId":91999,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological hip indices correlate with GMFCS level I and GMFM-66 scores in cerebral palsy\",\"authors\":\"Özlem Elvan, Mert Keskinbora, Havva Didem Çelikcan, A. Bobuş, A. Özgür, Mustafa Kömür, Zeliha Kurtoğlu Olgunus\",\"doi\":\"10.2399/ANA.19.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the certain radiological hip parameters and the effects of these parameters on the functional capacity of cerebral palsy (CP) children, to compare the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 scores) of hemiparetic and diparetic children with spastic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level 1, and to define possible differences or similarities with the control group. Methods: The radiographic parameters measured for CP and control groups were caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD), migration index (MI), center edge angle (CEA), acetabular index (AI) and pelvic obliquity. The functional capacity of the CP group was assessed by GMFM-66. Results: No significant differences were found in terms of sides of the same individual in each group. Significant differences were found between groups for left CCD, right MI, right and left AI, and right and left CEA. Correlation analyses revealed significant relationships between radiological parameters. Hemiparetics had statistically higher GMFM-66 dimension E score than diparetics. Conclusion: The threshold values for hip parameters were determined with CP in GMFCS level 1. The hemiparetic and diparetic children with CP, who were at the GMFCS level I and age group, had similar hip morphology. Development of femoral head and acetabulum in these children were not different from control group. Evaluating the functional levels of patients according to GMFM-66 scores with radiographic parameters is believed to contribute to the monitoring CP children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2399/ANA.19.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/ANA.19.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价脑瘫(CP)患儿的某些髋关节放射学参数及其对脑瘫(CP)患儿功能能力的影响,比较痉挛性CP患儿的大运动功能测量(GMFM-66评分)在大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS) 1级中的差异,并确定与对照组可能存在的异同。方法:CP组和对照组的影像学参数为头-柱-骨干夹角(CCD)、偏移指数(MI)、中心边缘夹角(CEA)、髋臼指数(AI)和骨盆倾角。采用GMFM-66评价CP组的功能能力。结果:两组在同一个体的侧面上无显著差异。左CCD、右MI、左AI、左CEA组间差异有统计学意义。相关分析显示放射学参数之间存在显著的相关性。偏瘫患者的GMFM-66维度E评分高于偏瘫患者。结论:GMFCS 1级时,可通过CP确定髋关节参数的阈值。在GMFCS水平为1级和年龄组的CP患儿中,偏瘫和渗水患儿的髋关节形态相似。患儿股骨头和髋臼的发育与对照组无明显差异。根据GMFM-66评分和影像学参数评估患者的功能水平被认为有助于监测CP儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiological hip indices correlate with GMFCS level I and GMFM-66 scores in cerebral palsy
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the certain radiological hip parameters and the effects of these parameters on the functional capacity of cerebral palsy (CP) children, to compare the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 scores) of hemiparetic and diparetic children with spastic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level 1, and to define possible differences or similarities with the control group. Methods: The radiographic parameters measured for CP and control groups were caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD), migration index (MI), center edge angle (CEA), acetabular index (AI) and pelvic obliquity. The functional capacity of the CP group was assessed by GMFM-66. Results: No significant differences were found in terms of sides of the same individual in each group. Significant differences were found between groups for left CCD, right MI, right and left AI, and right and left CEA. Correlation analyses revealed significant relationships between radiological parameters. Hemiparetics had statistically higher GMFM-66 dimension E score than diparetics. Conclusion: The threshold values for hip parameters were determined with CP in GMFCS level 1. The hemiparetic and diparetic children with CP, who were at the GMFCS level I and age group, had similar hip morphology. Development of femoral head and acetabulum in these children were not different from control group. Evaluating the functional levels of patients according to GMFM-66 scores with radiographic parameters is believed to contribute to the monitoring CP children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信