品牌体验研究综述及未来发展方向

Imran Khan , Zillur Rahman
{"title":"品牌体验研究综述及未来发展方向","authors":"Imran Khan ,&nbsp;Zillur Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.ism.2015.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brand experience has been gaining increased importance in marketing literature, as marketers consider it a vital strategy in building long term consumer-brand relationship. This study attempts to do a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of academic literature on brand experience. To do this, authors take up a systematic review, identifies and analyses 73 relevant articles from 38 journals. The analysis provides significant information about–empirical versus conceptual studies, industry focus, country of research, research design, data analysis techniques and nature of sampling method and respondents. This study presents methodological trend in brand experience studies with reference to Meredith,Raturi, Amoako-Gyampah, and Kaplan (1989) framework, and it has been found that majority of the studies are based on people's perception of object reality (logical positivist/empiricist paradigm based researches). A conceptual framework about brand experience antecedents and consequences is also presented. At last, we provide discussion and suggestions for future research, followed by limitations of the study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100721,"journal":{"name":"International Strategic Management Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ism.2015.09.003","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review and future directions of brand experience research\",\"authors\":\"Imran Khan ,&nbsp;Zillur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ism.2015.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Brand experience has been gaining increased importance in marketing literature, as marketers consider it a vital strategy in building long term consumer-brand relationship. This study attempts to do a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of academic literature on brand experience. To do this, authors take up a systematic review, identifies and analyses 73 relevant articles from 38 journals. The analysis provides significant information about–empirical versus conceptual studies, industry focus, country of research, research design, data analysis techniques and nature of sampling method and respondents. This study presents methodological trend in brand experience studies with reference to Meredith,Raturi, Amoako-Gyampah, and Kaplan (1989) framework, and it has been found that majority of the studies are based on people's perception of object reality (logical positivist/empiricist paradigm based researches). A conceptual framework about brand experience antecedents and consequences is also presented. At last, we provide discussion and suggestions for future research, followed by limitations of the study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Strategic Management Review\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ism.2015.09.003\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Strategic Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2306774815000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Strategic Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2306774815000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

品牌体验在营销文献中越来越重要,因为营销人员认为它是建立长期消费者品牌关系的重要策略。本研究试图对品牌体验的学术文献进行全面的评估和综合。为此,作者进行了一项系统综述,确定并分析了来自38种期刊的73篇相关文章。该分析提供了关于实证与概念研究、行业焦点、研究国家、研究设计、数据分析技术以及抽样方法和受访者性质的重要信息。本研究借鉴了Meredith、Raturi、Amoako-Gyampah和Kaplan(1989)的研究框架,提出了品牌体验研究的方法论趋势,并发现大多数研究都是基于人们对客体现实的感知(基于逻辑实证主义/经验主义范式的研究)。提出了品牌体验前因与后果的概念框架。最后,对未来的研究进行了讨论和建议,并指出了研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review and future directions of brand experience research

Brand experience has been gaining increased importance in marketing literature, as marketers consider it a vital strategy in building long term consumer-brand relationship. This study attempts to do a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of academic literature on brand experience. To do this, authors take up a systematic review, identifies and analyses 73 relevant articles from 38 journals. The analysis provides significant information about–empirical versus conceptual studies, industry focus, country of research, research design, data analysis techniques and nature of sampling method and respondents. This study presents methodological trend in brand experience studies with reference to Meredith,Raturi, Amoako-Gyampah, and Kaplan (1989) framework, and it has been found that majority of the studies are based on people's perception of object reality (logical positivist/empiricist paradigm based researches). A conceptual framework about brand experience antecedents and consequences is also presented. At last, we provide discussion and suggestions for future research, followed by limitations of the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信