短时间和长时间等距膝关节伸展时双侧肢体缺陷测量的比较

U. Kuruganti, P. Parker, M. Tingley, G. Sleivert
{"title":"短时间和长时间等距膝关节伸展时双侧肢体缺陷测量的比较","authors":"U. Kuruganti, P. Parker, M. Tingley, G. Sleivert","doi":"10.5580/1090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate the presence of the Bilateral Limb Deficit (BLD) during isometric knee extensions and the differences in voluntary activation and muscle fatigue during bilateral and unilateral contractions. Methods: Twelve subjects (6 female, 6 male, (mean ± standard deviation) age = 27.6 ± 6.9 years) completed a series of short (5-second) and long (30-second) isometric knee extensions during which force, myoelectric signal (MES) amplitude and voluntary activation were measured.Results: No BLD was detected during the isometric contractions and voluntary activation (estimated using the twitch interpolation technique) did not differ between unilateral and bilateral conditions The mean voluntary activation levels were significantly higher (p<.05) during the short (5-second) contractions (91% activation) than the first five seconds of the long (30-second) contractions (80% activation). Unilateral and bilateral contractions resulted in similar decreases in fatigue (measured as a decline in mean frequency). Significant differences were detected in the mean frequency (14 – 17 Hz) between short and long contractions (p < 0.001). Finally, it was found that the current used to elicit the maximal twitch force differed between unilateral and bilateral contractions suggesting that there are differences in the twitch response that may contribute to the BLD.Conclusion: These data showed that the BLD is not present during isometric knee extensions and that voluntary activation and neuromuscular fatigue are similar for bilateral and unilateral conditions. Differences were detected in voluntary activation between short and long contractions and between the current required to elicit a supramaximal twitch during bilateral and unilateral contractions.","PeriodicalId":22514,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Measures of the Bilateral Limb Deficit During Short and Long Time Isometric Knee Extensions\",\"authors\":\"U. Kuruganti, P. Parker, M. Tingley, G. Sleivert\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/1090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To investigate the presence of the Bilateral Limb Deficit (BLD) during isometric knee extensions and the differences in voluntary activation and muscle fatigue during bilateral and unilateral contractions. Methods: Twelve subjects (6 female, 6 male, (mean ± standard deviation) age = 27.6 ± 6.9 years) completed a series of short (5-second) and long (30-second) isometric knee extensions during which force, myoelectric signal (MES) amplitude and voluntary activation were measured.Results: No BLD was detected during the isometric contractions and voluntary activation (estimated using the twitch interpolation technique) did not differ between unilateral and bilateral conditions The mean voluntary activation levels were significantly higher (p<.05) during the short (5-second) contractions (91% activation) than the first five seconds of the long (30-second) contractions (80% activation). Unilateral and bilateral contractions resulted in similar decreases in fatigue (measured as a decline in mean frequency). Significant differences were detected in the mean frequency (14 – 17 Hz) between short and long contractions (p < 0.001). Finally, it was found that the current used to elicit the maximal twitch force differed between unilateral and bilateral contractions suggesting that there are differences in the twitch response that may contribute to the BLD.Conclusion: These data showed that the BLD is not present during isometric knee extensions and that voluntary activation and neuromuscular fatigue are similar for bilateral and unilateral conditions. Differences were detected in voluntary activation between short and long contractions and between the current required to elicit a supramaximal twitch during bilateral and unilateral contractions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet journal of microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet journal of microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/1090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:探讨双侧肢体缺损(BLD)在膝关节等长伸展时的存在,以及双侧和单侧收缩时随意激活和肌肉疲劳的差异。方法:12名受试者(女性6名,男性6名,(平均±标准差)年龄= 27.6±6.9岁)完成了一系列短(5秒)和长(30秒)的等距膝关节伸展运动,测量了力量、肌电信号(MES)振幅和自主活动。结果:在等距收缩期间未检测到BLD,单侧和双侧条件下的自愿激活(使用抽动插值技术估计)没有差异。短(5秒)收缩(91%激活)的平均自愿激活水平显著高于长(30秒)收缩(80%激活)的前5秒(p< 0.05)。单侧和双侧收缩导致相似的疲劳减少(以平均频率下降来测量)。短宫缩和长宫缩的平均频率(14 - 17 Hz)有显著差异(p < 0.001)。最后,研究发现,用于引起最大抽搐力的电流在单侧和双侧收缩之间存在差异,这表明抽搐反应存在差异,可能导致BLD。结论:这些数据表明,在等距膝关节伸展时不存在BLD,并且在双侧和单侧条件下,自愿激活和神经肌肉疲劳是相似的。在短收缩和长收缩之间以及在双侧和单侧收缩期间引起最大抽动所需的电流之间检测到自愿激活的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Measures of the Bilateral Limb Deficit During Short and Long Time Isometric Knee Extensions
Aim: To investigate the presence of the Bilateral Limb Deficit (BLD) during isometric knee extensions and the differences in voluntary activation and muscle fatigue during bilateral and unilateral contractions. Methods: Twelve subjects (6 female, 6 male, (mean ± standard deviation) age = 27.6 ± 6.9 years) completed a series of short (5-second) and long (30-second) isometric knee extensions during which force, myoelectric signal (MES) amplitude and voluntary activation were measured.Results: No BLD was detected during the isometric contractions and voluntary activation (estimated using the twitch interpolation technique) did not differ between unilateral and bilateral conditions The mean voluntary activation levels were significantly higher (p<.05) during the short (5-second) contractions (91% activation) than the first five seconds of the long (30-second) contractions (80% activation). Unilateral and bilateral contractions resulted in similar decreases in fatigue (measured as a decline in mean frequency). Significant differences were detected in the mean frequency (14 – 17 Hz) between short and long contractions (p < 0.001). Finally, it was found that the current used to elicit the maximal twitch force differed between unilateral and bilateral contractions suggesting that there are differences in the twitch response that may contribute to the BLD.Conclusion: These data showed that the BLD is not present during isometric knee extensions and that voluntary activation and neuromuscular fatigue are similar for bilateral and unilateral conditions. Differences were detected in voluntary activation between short and long contractions and between the current required to elicit a supramaximal twitch during bilateral and unilateral contractions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信