农村地区甲状腺FNAC报告Bethesda系统的评价

Sanjay Khandekar
{"title":"农村地区甲状腺FNAC报告Bethesda系统的评价","authors":"Sanjay Khandekar","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. \nMethods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. \nResults: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. \nConclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"94 1","pages":"229-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid FNAC in Rural Setup\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Khandekar\",\"doi\":\"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. \\nMethods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. \\nResults: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. \\nConclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"229-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目的:本研究旨在研究TBSRTC在我院的诊断效用,并将细胞学诊断与组织学诊断联系起来。方法:选取2016年1月至2016年10月10个月期间,对108例甲状腺肿大患者行细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)。31例(28.70%)患者均行手术治疗并行组织病理学检查。将细胞学诊断与组织病理学诊断进行比较。结果:108例患者中,以女性(87.03%)居多,年龄较小(n = 66[61.11%], 21 ~ 40岁)。FNAC诊断为不满意(2.77%)、良性(87.03%)、非典型性(0.92%)、滤泡/ Hurthle细胞肿瘤(4.62%)、可疑恶性(0.92%)和恶性(3.70%)。良性分类为4.5%,滤泡性肿瘤为20%,可疑恶性及恶性分类均为100%。31例细胞学诊断与组织学诊断一致29例(93.54%),不一致2例(6.45%)。细胞学和组织病理学诊断有很好的相关性。结论:Bethesda系统是一种实用的甲状腺细胞病理报告标准化系统。它改善了细胞病理学家和临床医生之间的沟通,导致更一致的管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid FNAC in Rural Setup
Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. Methods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. Results: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. Conclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信