{"title":"农村地区甲状腺FNAC报告Bethesda系统的评价","authors":"Sanjay Khandekar","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. \nMethods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. \nResults: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. \nConclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"94 1","pages":"229-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid FNAC in Rural Setup\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Khandekar\",\"doi\":\"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. \\nMethods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. \\nResults: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. \\nConclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"229-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid FNAC in Rural Setup
Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available.
Methods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available.
Results: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis.
Conclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.