{"title":"科学中的艺术:Velázquez和侏儒——观察的艺术。","authors":"G. Friedlaender, L. Friedlaender","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The terms “dwarf” and “dwarfism” (generally applied to individuals with achondroplasia) have a relatively recent appearance in the medical literature [3, 9]. The terms were first used in a clinical manner in the late 19th [13] and early 20th century [12], but did not become established for this purpose until associated with the detailed descriptions of the genetically based condition of achondroplasia in the 1950s [8]. Regardless of when the first medical reference to dwarfism appeared, that date is far more recent than the descriptions depicted with incredible accuracy by Spanish painter Diego Rodrı́guez de Silva y Velázquez (1599-1660), under the patronage of King Philip IV [7]. Born in Seville, in southwest Spain, Velázquez was a descendent of tradesfolk from Portugal who probably were Jewish conversos (products of the Inquisition) [14, 15]. He pursued his passion for art with formal training prior to the age of 12. Before leaving for Madrid in 1622, Velázquez was already established as an outstanding artist in Seville. With the introductions and opportunities afforded by his regional fame and his demonstrated talents (and the recent death of King Philip IV’s previously favorite painter, Rodrigo de Villandrando), he quickly won favor at the royal palace. Approaching the end of his highly acclaimed career, and despite his humble lineage, Velázquez was knighted in 1658 [4, 6]. Velázquez’s portraits, with their outstanding detail and perspective that reflected both technical realism and emotional transparency, remained his primary focus toward the end of his formidable career. One of his most acclaimed portraits, Las Meninas (The Ladies-in-Waiting; [Fig. 1]), includes images of dwarfs, and serves as an incredible example of his observational skills [7] Velázquez has likely contrived the scene depicted in Las Meninas, and done so to make several points [6, 10]. Most obvious is the insertion of the artist himself at the far left, as he is the largest figure in the painting. Depicted with brush, palette, and mahlstick in hand, he is in command of the content of the canvas by virtue of skill and observation. Indeed, Velázquez is making a statement about the control the artist has in the creative process of painting. The scene also provides commentary on the nature of the royal court, but his focus on the young infanta (Princess Margaret Theresa), absent the physical presence of King Philip IV and QueenMariana (although their reflections are seen in the mirror on the back wall), allows an informality and relaxation unavailable, by convention, in formal depictions of adult nobility [5]. The young regent, in the center of the painting is surrounded by attendants, including a chaperone, body guard, the queen’s chamberlain and head of the royal tapestries standing in the doorway, as well as her dog and two dwarfs at the far right of the canvas (Fig. 2). The dwarfs, A note from the Editor-in-Chief: I am pleased to present the next installment of “Art in Science,” team-written by Gary Friedlaender and Linda Friedlaender. Gary is the Wayne O. Southwick Professor, and Chair Emeritus for the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation at Yale School ofMedicine; Linda Friedlaender is the Senior Curator of Education at the Yale Center for British Art. Together, they will share observations from a fascinating vantage point: The intersection of art and medicine. We welcome reader feedback on all of our columns and articles; please send your comments toeic@clinorthop.org. The authors certify that neither they, nor any members of their immediate families, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. G. E. Friedlaender MD (✉), Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT, 06520-8071 USA, Email: gary. friedlaender@yale.edu","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"289 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Art in Science: Velázquez and Dwarfism-The Art of Observation.\",\"authors\":\"G. Friedlaender, L. Friedlaender\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The terms “dwarf” and “dwarfism” (generally applied to individuals with achondroplasia) have a relatively recent appearance in the medical literature [3, 9]. The terms were first used in a clinical manner in the late 19th [13] and early 20th century [12], but did not become established for this purpose until associated with the detailed descriptions of the genetically based condition of achondroplasia in the 1950s [8]. Regardless of when the first medical reference to dwarfism appeared, that date is far more recent than the descriptions depicted with incredible accuracy by Spanish painter Diego Rodrı́guez de Silva y Velázquez (1599-1660), under the patronage of King Philip IV [7]. Born in Seville, in southwest Spain, Velázquez was a descendent of tradesfolk from Portugal who probably were Jewish conversos (products of the Inquisition) [14, 15]. He pursued his passion for art with formal training prior to the age of 12. Before leaving for Madrid in 1622, Velázquez was already established as an outstanding artist in Seville. With the introductions and opportunities afforded by his regional fame and his demonstrated talents (and the recent death of King Philip IV’s previously favorite painter, Rodrigo de Villandrando), he quickly won favor at the royal palace. Approaching the end of his highly acclaimed career, and despite his humble lineage, Velázquez was knighted in 1658 [4, 6]. Velázquez’s portraits, with their outstanding detail and perspective that reflected both technical realism and emotional transparency, remained his primary focus toward the end of his formidable career. One of his most acclaimed portraits, Las Meninas (The Ladies-in-Waiting; [Fig. 1]), includes images of dwarfs, and serves as an incredible example of his observational skills [7] Velázquez has likely contrived the scene depicted in Las Meninas, and done so to make several points [6, 10]. Most obvious is the insertion of the artist himself at the far left, as he is the largest figure in the painting. Depicted with brush, palette, and mahlstick in hand, he is in command of the content of the canvas by virtue of skill and observation. Indeed, Velázquez is making a statement about the control the artist has in the creative process of painting. The scene also provides commentary on the nature of the royal court, but his focus on the young infanta (Princess Margaret Theresa), absent the physical presence of King Philip IV and QueenMariana (although their reflections are seen in the mirror on the back wall), allows an informality and relaxation unavailable, by convention, in formal depictions of adult nobility [5]. The young regent, in the center of the painting is surrounded by attendants, including a chaperone, body guard, the queen’s chamberlain and head of the royal tapestries standing in the doorway, as well as her dog and two dwarfs at the far right of the canvas (Fig. 2). The dwarfs, A note from the Editor-in-Chief: I am pleased to present the next installment of “Art in Science,” team-written by Gary Friedlaender and Linda Friedlaender. Gary is the Wayne O. Southwick Professor, and Chair Emeritus for the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation at Yale School ofMedicine; Linda Friedlaender is the Senior Curator of Education at the Yale Center for British Art. Together, they will share observations from a fascinating vantage point: The intersection of art and medicine. We welcome reader feedback on all of our columns and articles; please send your comments toeic@clinorthop.org. The authors certify that neither they, nor any members of their immediate families, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. G. E. Friedlaender MD (✉), Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT, 06520-8071 USA, Email: gary. friedlaender@yale.edu\",\"PeriodicalId\":10465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"289 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
术语“侏儒”和“侏儒症”(通常用于软骨发育不全的个体)在医学文献中出现的时间相对较晚[3,9]。这些术语在19世纪末和20世纪初首次用于临床,但直到20世纪50年代对软骨发育不全的遗传基础疾病的详细描述才被确立。不管第一次侏儒症的医学文献是什么时候出现的,这个日期远比西班牙画家迭戈·罗德里格斯·德·席尔瓦(1599-1660)在国王菲利普四世的赞助下以令人难以置信的准确性描绘的描述要近得多。Velázquez出生于西班牙西南部的塞维利亚,是葡萄牙商人的后裔,他们可能是犹太教皈依者(宗教裁判所的产物)[14,15]。他在12岁之前就接受了正式的艺术训练。在1622年离开马德里之前,Velázquez已经在塞维利亚建立了杰出的艺术家地位。由于他在当地的名声和他所展示的才能(以及国王菲利普四世以前最喜欢的画家罗德里戈·德·维兰多最近去世),他很快赢得了王室的青睐。在他备受赞誉的职业生涯即将结束时,尽管他的出身卑微,Velázquez还是在1658年被封为爵士[4,6]。Velázquez的肖像,以其出色的细节和视角,反映了技术现实主义和情感透明,仍然是他的主要焦点,直到他的可怕的职业生涯结束。他最著名的肖像画之一《宫女》(The Ladies-in-Waiting);[图1]),包括侏儒的图像,并作为他的观察技巧的一个令人难以置信的例子[7]Velázquez很可能设计了《宫女图》中描绘的场景,这样做是为了证明几个观点[6,10]。最明显的是在最左边插入了艺术家本人,因为他是画中最大的人物。他手里拿着画笔、调色板和mahmahstick,凭借技巧和观察力掌控着画布上的内容。的确,Velázquez是在声明艺术家在绘画创作过程中的控制力。这一场景也提供了对皇家宫廷性质的评论,但他把重点放在了年轻的公主(玛格丽特·特蕾莎公主)身上,没有国王菲利普四世和王后玛丽安娜的身影(尽管他们的倒影在后墙的镜子里可以看到),这给了一种非正式和放松,这是传统上对成年贵族的正式描绘所没有的。年轻的摄政王,在画的中心被随从包围,包括监护人,保镖,女王的侍从和站在门口的皇家织毯的负责人,以及她的狗和两个小矮人在画布的最右边(图2)。小矮人,主编的注释:我很高兴为大家呈现下一篇“科学中的艺术”,由加里·弗里德兰德和琳达·弗里德兰德共同撰写。Gary是耶鲁大学医学院(Yale School of medicine)骨科与康复系的Wayne O. Southwick教授和名誉主席;琳达·弗里德兰德(Linda Friedlaender)是耶鲁大学英国艺术中心教育高级策展人。在一起,他们将从一个迷人的有利位置分享观察:艺术和医学的交集。我们欢迎读者对我们所有的专栏和文章进行反馈;请发送您的意见toeic@clinorthop.org。作者证明其本人及其直系亲属均无任何可能与所提交文章产生利益冲突的商业协会(如咨询公司、股票所有权、股权、专利/许可安排等)。本文仅代表作者个人观点,不代表CORR或骨关节外科医师协会的观点或政策。G. E. Friedlaender MD (MD),耶鲁大学医学院,邮编208071,康涅狄格州纽黑文,06520-8071,邮箱:gary。friedlaender@yale.edu
Art in Science: Velázquez and Dwarfism-The Art of Observation.
The terms “dwarf” and “dwarfism” (generally applied to individuals with achondroplasia) have a relatively recent appearance in the medical literature [3, 9]. The terms were first used in a clinical manner in the late 19th [13] and early 20th century [12], but did not become established for this purpose until associated with the detailed descriptions of the genetically based condition of achondroplasia in the 1950s [8]. Regardless of when the first medical reference to dwarfism appeared, that date is far more recent than the descriptions depicted with incredible accuracy by Spanish painter Diego Rodrı́guez de Silva y Velázquez (1599-1660), under the patronage of King Philip IV [7]. Born in Seville, in southwest Spain, Velázquez was a descendent of tradesfolk from Portugal who probably were Jewish conversos (products of the Inquisition) [14, 15]. He pursued his passion for art with formal training prior to the age of 12. Before leaving for Madrid in 1622, Velázquez was already established as an outstanding artist in Seville. With the introductions and opportunities afforded by his regional fame and his demonstrated talents (and the recent death of King Philip IV’s previously favorite painter, Rodrigo de Villandrando), he quickly won favor at the royal palace. Approaching the end of his highly acclaimed career, and despite his humble lineage, Velázquez was knighted in 1658 [4, 6]. Velázquez’s portraits, with their outstanding detail and perspective that reflected both technical realism and emotional transparency, remained his primary focus toward the end of his formidable career. One of his most acclaimed portraits, Las Meninas (The Ladies-in-Waiting; [Fig. 1]), includes images of dwarfs, and serves as an incredible example of his observational skills [7] Velázquez has likely contrived the scene depicted in Las Meninas, and done so to make several points [6, 10]. Most obvious is the insertion of the artist himself at the far left, as he is the largest figure in the painting. Depicted with brush, palette, and mahlstick in hand, he is in command of the content of the canvas by virtue of skill and observation. Indeed, Velázquez is making a statement about the control the artist has in the creative process of painting. The scene also provides commentary on the nature of the royal court, but his focus on the young infanta (Princess Margaret Theresa), absent the physical presence of King Philip IV and QueenMariana (although their reflections are seen in the mirror on the back wall), allows an informality and relaxation unavailable, by convention, in formal depictions of adult nobility [5]. The young regent, in the center of the painting is surrounded by attendants, including a chaperone, body guard, the queen’s chamberlain and head of the royal tapestries standing in the doorway, as well as her dog and two dwarfs at the far right of the canvas (Fig. 2). The dwarfs, A note from the Editor-in-Chief: I am pleased to present the next installment of “Art in Science,” team-written by Gary Friedlaender and Linda Friedlaender. Gary is the Wayne O. Southwick Professor, and Chair Emeritus for the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation at Yale School ofMedicine; Linda Friedlaender is the Senior Curator of Education at the Yale Center for British Art. Together, they will share observations from a fascinating vantage point: The intersection of art and medicine. We welcome reader feedback on all of our columns and articles; please send your comments toeic@clinorthop.org. The authors certify that neither they, nor any members of their immediate families, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. G. E. Friedlaender MD (✉), Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT, 06520-8071 USA, Email: gary. friedlaender@yale.edu