048脑电图的适应症和效用,医院实践的审计

Nicholas F Halliwell, Lucy Q. Zhang, Stephan Golja, Ellie Skacel, Renee Pope, Callan A Coventry, Chinthuran Thilagarajan, Georgie CJ Dixson, Anna Schutz
{"title":"048脑电图的适应症和效用,医院实践的审计","authors":"Nicholas F Halliwell, Lucy Q. Zhang, Stephan Golja, Ellie Skacel, Renee Pope, Callan A Coventry, Chinthuran Thilagarajan, Georgie CJ Dixson, Anna Schutz","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The MBS taskforce recommends discouraging use of electroencephalogram (EEG) investigations for low yield indications without neurological specialty input. This study aimed to examine the indications and utility of electroencephalogram within a hospital setting. Methods A retrospective audit was undertaken over a 3 month period across two hospitals of adult inpatient EEGs ordered by services other than neurology. Results Data was collected on 236 EEG encounters. 11% of EEGs performed had a definitive diagnosis of seizures on discharge, of these EEGs the report documented; a normal EEG in 7%, epileptiform activity in 19%, and non-specific slowing in 74%. 17% of Adult EEGs were performed for low yield indications. None of these EEGs resulted in change of management nor a diagnosis of seizures. An additional 14% were performed as part of a ‘falls work up,’ none of the EEGs for this indication resulted in a diagnosis of seizure on the discharge summary. Conclusion This audit supports previous findings that EEGs have a low sensitivity and can not be exclusively used to attain a diagnosis. Low yield indications were common within this audit and the EEG was not clinically significant in this group. EEG should not be used to rule out seizures when the clinical suspicion for seizures is near zero and this audit identified an additional low yield category within the hospital setting as part of a ‘falls work up.’ This study supports the conservative use of EEG in line with the MBS funding taskforce protocol.","PeriodicalId":20317,"journal":{"name":"Poster Discussion Abstracts","volume":"447 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"048 The indications and utility of electroencephalogram, an audit of hospital practices\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas F Halliwell, Lucy Q. Zhang, Stephan Golja, Ellie Skacel, Renee Pope, Callan A Coventry, Chinthuran Thilagarajan, Georgie CJ Dixson, Anna Schutz\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives The MBS taskforce recommends discouraging use of electroencephalogram (EEG) investigations for low yield indications without neurological specialty input. This study aimed to examine the indications and utility of electroencephalogram within a hospital setting. Methods A retrospective audit was undertaken over a 3 month period across two hospitals of adult inpatient EEGs ordered by services other than neurology. Results Data was collected on 236 EEG encounters. 11% of EEGs performed had a definitive diagnosis of seizures on discharge, of these EEGs the report documented; a normal EEG in 7%, epileptiform activity in 19%, and non-specific slowing in 74%. 17% of Adult EEGs were performed for low yield indications. None of these EEGs resulted in change of management nor a diagnosis of seizures. An additional 14% were performed as part of a ‘falls work up,’ none of the EEGs for this indication resulted in a diagnosis of seizure on the discharge summary. Conclusion This audit supports previous findings that EEGs have a low sensitivity and can not be exclusively used to attain a diagnosis. Low yield indications were common within this audit and the EEG was not clinically significant in this group. EEG should not be used to rule out seizures when the clinical suspicion for seizures is near zero and this audit identified an additional low yield category within the hospital setting as part of a ‘falls work up.’ This study supports the conservative use of EEG in line with the MBS funding taskforce protocol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poster Discussion Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"447 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poster Discussion Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Discussion Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

MBS工作组建议不鼓励在没有神经学专业输入的情况下使用脑电图(EEG)调查低收益适应症。本研究旨在探讨脑电图的适应症和在医院设置的效用。方法回顾性分析两家医院3个月来非神经科门诊成人住院患者的脑电图。结果共收集236例脑电图数据。11%的脑电图在出院时明确诊断为癫痫发作,报告记录了这些脑电图;脑电图正常者占7%,癫痫样活动者占19%,非特异性减慢者占74%。17%的成人脑电图是针对低产率适应症进行的。这些脑电图都没有导致治疗的改变或癫痫发作的诊断。另外14%是作为“跌倒工作”的一部分进行的,这一适应症的脑电图在出院总结中没有一个诊断为癫痫发作。结论:本次审核支持了先前的发现,即脑电图灵敏度低,不能专门用于诊断。低产量指征在这次审计中很常见,脑电图在该组中没有临床意义。当临床对癫痫发作的怀疑接近于零时,脑电图不应用于排除癫痫发作,并且该审计确定了医院设置中的另一个低收益类别,作为“跌倒工作”的一部分。“这项研究支持脑电图的保守使用,符合MBS资助工作组的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
048 The indications and utility of electroencephalogram, an audit of hospital practices
Objectives The MBS taskforce recommends discouraging use of electroencephalogram (EEG) investigations for low yield indications without neurological specialty input. This study aimed to examine the indications and utility of electroencephalogram within a hospital setting. Methods A retrospective audit was undertaken over a 3 month period across two hospitals of adult inpatient EEGs ordered by services other than neurology. Results Data was collected on 236 EEG encounters. 11% of EEGs performed had a definitive diagnosis of seizures on discharge, of these EEGs the report documented; a normal EEG in 7%, epileptiform activity in 19%, and non-specific slowing in 74%. 17% of Adult EEGs were performed for low yield indications. None of these EEGs resulted in change of management nor a diagnosis of seizures. An additional 14% were performed as part of a ‘falls work up,’ none of the EEGs for this indication resulted in a diagnosis of seizure on the discharge summary. Conclusion This audit supports previous findings that EEGs have a low sensitivity and can not be exclusively used to attain a diagnosis. Low yield indications were common within this audit and the EEG was not clinically significant in this group. EEG should not be used to rule out seizures when the clinical suspicion for seizures is near zero and this audit identified an additional low yield category within the hospital setting as part of a ‘falls work up.’ This study supports the conservative use of EEG in line with the MBS funding taskforce protocol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信