塞尔维亚王国的法官考试

IF 0.2 N/A ART
Z. Čvorović
{"title":"塞尔维亚王国的法官考试","authors":"Z. Čvorović","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2180523c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the history of the judge exam in the Kingdom of Serbia. So far, this issue has not been the subject of legal-historical research, although the institution of a special judge exam has a tradition of more than a century in Serbian law. The subject of the paper is processed mainly on the basis of original unpublished and published archival material, as well as relevant domestic literature. Researching the history of the judge exam is important for researching the broader problem of judicial independence in the Kingdom of Serbia, since judicial competence is an important guarantee of judicial independence. The research of the history of the judge exam in Serbia is important at this moment given the fact that the official strategic documents of the Government of the Republic of Serbia announced the reform of the existing concept of the Bar Exam. Without knowing the beginnings of the application of the judge exam institution in Serbian law, it is difficult to implement a valid reform of the institution of the Bar Exam today. The institution of the judge exam was prescribed for the first time in the Kingdom of Serbia by the Law on Judges from 1891, but no sooner than 1911 did it come to life with the adoption of the Law on Judges and the Rules for Taking the Judge Exam. Only persons who worked in the civil service for a certain number of years had the right to take the judge exam, while lawyers who worked in the court were privileged in relation to lawyers from other professions. A number of measures were envisaged to ensure impartiality and publicity. The judge exam was three-part, consisting of a written essay (theme), solving a hypothetical case (clausura) and an oral exam. The legal-theoretical knowledge of the candidates about a specific institute, as well as the knowledge of national and comparative positive law were checked with the written essay. Clausura and the oral exam served to test the practical knowledge of the application of national material and procedural legislation.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judge exam in the kingdom of Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Z. Čvorović\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zmsdn2180523c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with the history of the judge exam in the Kingdom of Serbia. So far, this issue has not been the subject of legal-historical research, although the institution of a special judge exam has a tradition of more than a century in Serbian law. The subject of the paper is processed mainly on the basis of original unpublished and published archival material, as well as relevant domestic literature. Researching the history of the judge exam is important for researching the broader problem of judicial independence in the Kingdom of Serbia, since judicial competence is an important guarantee of judicial independence. The research of the history of the judge exam in Serbia is important at this moment given the fact that the official strategic documents of the Government of the Republic of Serbia announced the reform of the existing concept of the Bar Exam. Without knowing the beginnings of the application of the judge exam institution in Serbian law, it is difficult to implement a valid reform of the institution of the Bar Exam today. The institution of the judge exam was prescribed for the first time in the Kingdom of Serbia by the Law on Judges from 1891, but no sooner than 1911 did it come to life with the adoption of the Law on Judges and the Rules for Taking the Judge Exam. Only persons who worked in the civil service for a certain number of years had the right to take the judge exam, while lawyers who worked in the court were privileged in relation to lawyers from other professions. A number of measures were envisaged to ensure impartiality and publicity. The judge exam was three-part, consisting of a written essay (theme), solving a hypothetical case (clausura) and an oral exam. The legal-theoretical knowledge of the candidates about a specific institute, as well as the knowledge of national and comparative positive law were checked with the written essay. Clausura and the oral exam served to test the practical knowledge of the application of national material and procedural legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2180523c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2180523c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了塞尔维亚王国法官考试的历史。到目前为止,这个问题还不是法律历史研究的主题,尽管特别法官考试制度在塞尔维亚法律中有一个多世纪的传统。本文的主题主要是在原始未发表和已发表的档案资料以及国内相关文献的基础上进行处理的。研究法官考试的历史对于研究塞尔维亚王国更广泛的司法独立问题具有重要意义,因为司法能力是司法独立的重要保证。鉴于塞尔维亚共和国政府的官方战略文件宣布改革现有的律师考试概念,研究塞尔维亚法官考试的历史在这个时刻是很重要的。如果不了解法官考试制度在塞尔维亚法律中应用的开端,今天很难对律师考试制度进行有效的改革。1891年《法官法》第一次在塞尔维亚王国规定了法官考试制度,但直到1911年《法官法》和《法官考试规则》的通过才使法官考试制度得以实行。只有在公务员制度中工作一定年限的人才有权参加法官考试,而在法院工作的律师则比其他职业的律师享有特权。设想了若干措施以确保公正性和公开性。法官考试分为三个部分,包括写作(主题),解决一个假设案件(从句)和口试。候选人对特定机构的法律理论知识,以及国家和比较实证法的知识都通过书面文章进行检查。考试和口头考试的作用是测试对应用国家物权法和程序法的实际知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judge exam in the kingdom of Serbia
The paper deals with the history of the judge exam in the Kingdom of Serbia. So far, this issue has not been the subject of legal-historical research, although the institution of a special judge exam has a tradition of more than a century in Serbian law. The subject of the paper is processed mainly on the basis of original unpublished and published archival material, as well as relevant domestic literature. Researching the history of the judge exam is important for researching the broader problem of judicial independence in the Kingdom of Serbia, since judicial competence is an important guarantee of judicial independence. The research of the history of the judge exam in Serbia is important at this moment given the fact that the official strategic documents of the Government of the Republic of Serbia announced the reform of the existing concept of the Bar Exam. Without knowing the beginnings of the application of the judge exam institution in Serbian law, it is difficult to implement a valid reform of the institution of the Bar Exam today. The institution of the judge exam was prescribed for the first time in the Kingdom of Serbia by the Law on Judges from 1891, but no sooner than 1911 did it come to life with the adoption of the Law on Judges and the Rules for Taking the Judge Exam. Only persons who worked in the civil service for a certain number of years had the right to take the judge exam, while lawyers who worked in the court were privileged in relation to lawyers from other professions. A number of measures were envisaged to ensure impartiality and publicity. The judge exam was three-part, consisting of a written essay (theme), solving a hypothetical case (clausura) and an oral exam. The legal-theoretical knowledge of the candidates about a specific institute, as well as the knowledge of national and comparative positive law were checked with the written essay. Clausura and the oral exam served to test the practical knowledge of the application of national material and procedural legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信