{"title":"家谱作为文化和生物学:托克劳案例研究","authors":"J. Huntsman, Antony Hooper, R. Ward","doi":"10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has become dogma among cultural anthropologists that genealogies are primarily political documents which do not necessarily give reliable accounts of actual biological relationships. This paper examines this assertion in the light of social and serological evidence from one small Polynesian society. It is shown that, within certain limits, Tokelau genealogies do give accurate accounts of biological relationships, and provide a sound basis for interdisciplinary studies which cross the interface between biological and social systems.","PeriodicalId":85116,"journal":{"name":"Mankind","volume":"18 1","pages":"13-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genealogies as Culture and Biology: a Tokelau Case Study\",\"authors\":\"J. Huntsman, Antony Hooper, R. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has become dogma among cultural anthropologists that genealogies are primarily political documents which do not necessarily give reliable accounts of actual biological relationships. This paper examines this assertion in the light of social and serological evidence from one small Polynesian society. It is shown that, within certain limits, Tokelau genealogies do give accurate accounts of biological relationships, and provide a sound basis for interdisciplinary studies which cross the interface between biological and social systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mankind\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"13-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mankind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genealogies as Culture and Biology: a Tokelau Case Study
It has become dogma among cultural anthropologists that genealogies are primarily political documents which do not necessarily give reliable accounts of actual biological relationships. This paper examines this assertion in the light of social and serological evidence from one small Polynesian society. It is shown that, within certain limits, Tokelau genealogies do give accurate accounts of biological relationships, and provide a sound basis for interdisciplinary studies which cross the interface between biological and social systems.