家谱作为文化和生物学:托克劳案例研究

J. Huntsman, Antony Hooper, R. Ward
{"title":"家谱作为文化和生物学:托克劳案例研究","authors":"J. Huntsman, Antony Hooper, R. Ward","doi":"10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has become dogma among cultural anthropologists that genealogies are primarily political documents which do not necessarily give reliable accounts of actual biological relationships. This paper examines this assertion in the light of social and serological evidence from one small Polynesian society. It is shown that, within certain limits, Tokelau genealogies do give accurate accounts of biological relationships, and provide a sound basis for interdisciplinary studies which cross the interface between biological and social systems.","PeriodicalId":85116,"journal":{"name":"Mankind","volume":"18 1","pages":"13-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genealogies as Culture and Biology: a Tokelau Case Study\",\"authors\":\"J. Huntsman, Antony Hooper, R. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has become dogma among cultural anthropologists that genealogies are primarily political documents which do not necessarily give reliable accounts of actual biological relationships. This paper examines this assertion in the light of social and serological evidence from one small Polynesian society. It is shown that, within certain limits, Tokelau genealogies do give accurate accounts of biological relationships, and provide a sound basis for interdisciplinary studies which cross the interface between biological and social systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mankind\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"13-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mankind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1835-9310.1986.TB01275.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文化人类学家中,家谱主要是政治文献,不一定能对实际的生物关系给出可靠的描述,这已经成为一种教条。本文根据来自一个小波利尼西亚社会的社会和血清学证据来检验这一论断。研究表明,在一定限度内,托克劳的家谱确实准确地说明了生物关系,并为跨越生物系统和社会系统之间的界面的跨学科研究提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genealogies as Culture and Biology: a Tokelau Case Study
It has become dogma among cultural anthropologists that genealogies are primarily political documents which do not necessarily give reliable accounts of actual biological relationships. This paper examines this assertion in the light of social and serological evidence from one small Polynesian society. It is shown that, within certain limits, Tokelau genealogies do give accurate accounts of biological relationships, and provide a sound basis for interdisciplinary studies which cross the interface between biological and social systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信