A. Capucci, D. Aschieri, M. Piepoli, G. Bardy, E. Iconomu, Maurizio Arvedi
{"title":"在没有传统心肺复苏教育的情况下,通过早期除颤使心脏骤停患者的生存率提高三倍","authors":"A. Capucci, D. Aschieri, M. Piepoli, G. Bardy, E. Iconomu, Maurizio Arvedi","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000028148.62305.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Early defibrillation is the most important intervention affecting survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). To improve public access to early defibrillation, we established Piacenza Progetto Vita (PPV), the first system of out-of-hospital early defibrillation by first-responder volunteers. Methods and Results—The system serves a population of 173 114 residents in the Piacenza region of Italy. Equipment for the system comprises 39 semiautomatic external biphasic defibrillators (AEDs): 12 placed in high-risk locations, 12 in lay-staffed ambulances, and 15 in police cars; 1285 lay volunteers trained in use of the AED, without traditional education in cardiac pulmonary resuscitation, responded to all cases of suspected SCA, in coordination with the Emergency Medical System (EMS). During the first 22 months, 354 SCA occurred (72±12 years, 73% witnessed). The PPV volunteers treated 143 SCA cases (40.4%), with an EMS call-to-arrival time of 4.8±1.2 minutes (versus 6.2±2.3 minutes for EMS, P =0.05). Overall survival rate to hospital discharge was tripled from 3.3% (7 of 211) for EMS intervention to 10.5% (15 of 143) for PPV intervention (P =0.006). The survival rate for witnessed SCA was tripled by PPV: 15.5% versus 4.3% in the EMS-treated group (P =0.002). A “shockable” rhythm was present in 23.8% (34 of 143) of the PPV patients versus 15.6% (33 of 211) of the EMS patients (P =0.055). The survival rate from shockable dysrhythmias was higher for PPV versus EMS: 44.1% (15 of 34) versus 21.2% (7 of 33), P =0.046. The neurologically intact survival rate was higher in PPV-treated versus EMS-treated patients: 8.4% (12 of 143) versus 2.4% (5 of 211), P =0.009. Conclusions—Broad dissemination of AEDs for use by nonmedical volunteers enabled early defibrillation and tripled the survival rate for out-of-hospital SCA.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"437 1","pages":"1065-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"325","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tripling Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest Via Early Defibrillation Without Traditional Education in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation\",\"authors\":\"A. Capucci, D. Aschieri, M. Piepoli, G. Bardy, E. Iconomu, Maurizio Arvedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.CIR.0000028148.62305.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background—Early defibrillation is the most important intervention affecting survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). To improve public access to early defibrillation, we established Piacenza Progetto Vita (PPV), the first system of out-of-hospital early defibrillation by first-responder volunteers. Methods and Results—The system serves a population of 173 114 residents in the Piacenza region of Italy. Equipment for the system comprises 39 semiautomatic external biphasic defibrillators (AEDs): 12 placed in high-risk locations, 12 in lay-staffed ambulances, and 15 in police cars; 1285 lay volunteers trained in use of the AED, without traditional education in cardiac pulmonary resuscitation, responded to all cases of suspected SCA, in coordination with the Emergency Medical System (EMS). During the first 22 months, 354 SCA occurred (72±12 years, 73% witnessed). The PPV volunteers treated 143 SCA cases (40.4%), with an EMS call-to-arrival time of 4.8±1.2 minutes (versus 6.2±2.3 minutes for EMS, P =0.05). Overall survival rate to hospital discharge was tripled from 3.3% (7 of 211) for EMS intervention to 10.5% (15 of 143) for PPV intervention (P =0.006). The survival rate for witnessed SCA was tripled by PPV: 15.5% versus 4.3% in the EMS-treated group (P =0.002). A “shockable” rhythm was present in 23.8% (34 of 143) of the PPV patients versus 15.6% (33 of 211) of the EMS patients (P =0.055). The survival rate from shockable dysrhythmias was higher for PPV versus EMS: 44.1% (15 of 34) versus 21.2% (7 of 33), P =0.046. The neurologically intact survival rate was higher in PPV-treated versus EMS-treated patients: 8.4% (12 of 143) versus 2.4% (5 of 211), P =0.009. Conclusions—Broad dissemination of AEDs for use by nonmedical volunteers enabled early defibrillation and tripled the survival rate for out-of-hospital SCA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"437 1\",\"pages\":\"1065-1070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"325\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028148.62305.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028148.62305.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 325
摘要
背景:早期除颤是影响心脏骤停(SCA)患者生存的最重要的干预措施。为了提高公众获得早期除颤的机会,我们建立了Piacenza Progetto Vita (PPV),这是第一个由急救志愿者提供的院外早期除颤系统。方法与结果:该系统为意大利皮亚琴察地区173114名居民提供服务。该系统的设备包括39台半自动体外双相除颤器(aed): 12台安装在高风险地点,12台安装在非专业人员的救护车上,15台安装在警车上;1285名接受过AED使用培训的非专业志愿者,没有接受过传统的心肺复苏教育,在紧急医疗系统(EMS)的配合下,对所有疑似SCA病例做出了反应。前22个月发生354例SCA(72±12年,73%)。PPV志愿者治疗143例SCA (40.4%), EMS呼叫到达时间为4.8±1.2分钟(EMS为6.2±2.3分钟,P =0.05)。总生存率从EMS干预组的3.3%(211人中7人)到PPV干预组的10.5%(143人中15人)增加了两倍(P =0.006)。经PPV治疗的SCA患者的生存率为15.5%,而ems治疗组为4.3% (P =0.002)。PPV患者中有23.8%(143例中的34例)存在“震荡性”心律,而EMS患者中有15.6%(211例中的33例)存在“震荡性”心律(P =0.055)。与EMS相比,PPV的休克性心律失常生存率更高:44.1% (15 / 34)vs 21.2% (7 / 33), P =0.046。ppv治疗的神经系统完整生存率高于ems治疗的患者:8.4%(143 / 12)对2.4% (211 / 5),P =0.009。结论:在非医疗志愿者中广泛推广使用aed能够实现早期除颤,并使院外SCA的生存率提高了两倍。
Tripling Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest Via Early Defibrillation Without Traditional Education in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Background—Early defibrillation is the most important intervention affecting survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). To improve public access to early defibrillation, we established Piacenza Progetto Vita (PPV), the first system of out-of-hospital early defibrillation by first-responder volunteers. Methods and Results—The system serves a population of 173 114 residents in the Piacenza region of Italy. Equipment for the system comprises 39 semiautomatic external biphasic defibrillators (AEDs): 12 placed in high-risk locations, 12 in lay-staffed ambulances, and 15 in police cars; 1285 lay volunteers trained in use of the AED, without traditional education in cardiac pulmonary resuscitation, responded to all cases of suspected SCA, in coordination with the Emergency Medical System (EMS). During the first 22 months, 354 SCA occurred (72±12 years, 73% witnessed). The PPV volunteers treated 143 SCA cases (40.4%), with an EMS call-to-arrival time of 4.8±1.2 minutes (versus 6.2±2.3 minutes for EMS, P =0.05). Overall survival rate to hospital discharge was tripled from 3.3% (7 of 211) for EMS intervention to 10.5% (15 of 143) for PPV intervention (P =0.006). The survival rate for witnessed SCA was tripled by PPV: 15.5% versus 4.3% in the EMS-treated group (P =0.002). A “shockable” rhythm was present in 23.8% (34 of 143) of the PPV patients versus 15.6% (33 of 211) of the EMS patients (P =0.055). The survival rate from shockable dysrhythmias was higher for PPV versus EMS: 44.1% (15 of 34) versus 21.2% (7 of 33), P =0.046. The neurologically intact survival rate was higher in PPV-treated versus EMS-treated patients: 8.4% (12 of 143) versus 2.4% (5 of 211), P =0.009. Conclusions—Broad dissemination of AEDs for use by nonmedical volunteers enabled early defibrillation and tripled the survival rate for out-of-hospital SCA.