氧化酶阳性菌在人鼻中的发病率及种类分布,以遗传转化诊断为主。

K. Bøvre
{"title":"氧化酶阳性菌在人鼻中的发病率及种类分布,以遗传转化诊断为主。","authors":"K. Bøvre","doi":"10.1111/J.1699-0463.1970.TB04369.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By diagnostic application of genetic transformation, the occurrence of oxidase positive bacteria in the human nose cavity was examined. Neisseria catarrhalis and Moraxella nonliqucfaciens were the predominating organisms, being equally frequent and representing 87.3 per cent of 111 oxidase positive isolates. In part of the study, comprising 130 patients, N.catarrhalis was isolated from 16.2 per cent and M. nonliquefaciens from 17.7 per cent of the nose specimens. M. liquefaciens and M. osloensis were isolated only occasionally, whereas the two species M. phenylpyrouvica and M. kingii were not encountered. Ten per cent of the isolates belonged to genus Neisseria in the strict sense. An ecological distinction is thereby indicated between rodshaped moraxellae (e.g., M. nonliquefaciens) and “false neisseriae” (e.g., N. catarrhalis) on the one hand and the “true neisseriae” on the other, with only the former groups having an important habitat in the nose. N. elongata, a rodshaped member of genus Neisseria, was not observed in this location. About 80 per cent of the N. catarrhalis and M. nonliquefaciens strains were competent in genetic transformation.","PeriodicalId":7323,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology","volume":"5 1","pages":"780-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxidase positive bacteria in the human nose incidence and species distribution, as diagnosed by genetic transformation.\",\"authors\":\"K. Bøvre\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1699-0463.1970.TB04369.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By diagnostic application of genetic transformation, the occurrence of oxidase positive bacteria in the human nose cavity was examined. Neisseria catarrhalis and Moraxella nonliqucfaciens were the predominating organisms, being equally frequent and representing 87.3 per cent of 111 oxidase positive isolates. In part of the study, comprising 130 patients, N.catarrhalis was isolated from 16.2 per cent and M. nonliquefaciens from 17.7 per cent of the nose specimens. M. liquefaciens and M. osloensis were isolated only occasionally, whereas the two species M. phenylpyrouvica and M. kingii were not encountered. Ten per cent of the isolates belonged to genus Neisseria in the strict sense. An ecological distinction is thereby indicated between rodshaped moraxellae (e.g., M. nonliquefaciens) and “false neisseriae” (e.g., N. catarrhalis) on the one hand and the “true neisseriae” on the other, with only the former groups having an important habitat in the nose. N. elongata, a rodshaped member of genus Neisseria, was not observed in this location. About 80 per cent of the N. catarrhalis and M. nonliquefaciens strains were competent in genetic transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"780-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1699-0463.1970.TB04369.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1699-0463.1970.TB04369.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

应用遗传转化诊断方法,对人鼻腔内氧化酶阳性菌的发生情况进行了检测。卡他利奈瑟菌和非果汁莫拉菌是主要的微生物,同样常见,占111个氧化酶阳性分离株的87.3%。在包括130名患者的部分研究中,从16.2%的鼻标本中分离出卡他奈姆菌,从17.7%的鼻标本中分离出非液化奈姆菌。液化支原体和奥斯洛支原体偶有分离,而苯丙酮支原体和王支原体未见分离。10%的分离株属于严格意义上的奈瑟菌属。因此,杆状莫拉菌(如M. non液化菌)和“假奈瑟菌”(如N. catarrhalis)与“真奈瑟菌”之间存在着生态上的区别,只有前者在鼻子中有重要的栖息地。在这个位置没有观察到奈瑟菌属的棒状成员长形奈瑟菌。约80%的卡塔利奈瑟菌和非液化奈瑟菌能进行遗传转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxidase positive bacteria in the human nose incidence and species distribution, as diagnosed by genetic transformation.
By diagnostic application of genetic transformation, the occurrence of oxidase positive bacteria in the human nose cavity was examined. Neisseria catarrhalis and Moraxella nonliqucfaciens were the predominating organisms, being equally frequent and representing 87.3 per cent of 111 oxidase positive isolates. In part of the study, comprising 130 patients, N.catarrhalis was isolated from 16.2 per cent and M. nonliquefaciens from 17.7 per cent of the nose specimens. M. liquefaciens and M. osloensis were isolated only occasionally, whereas the two species M. phenylpyrouvica and M. kingii were not encountered. Ten per cent of the isolates belonged to genus Neisseria in the strict sense. An ecological distinction is thereby indicated between rodshaped moraxellae (e.g., M. nonliquefaciens) and “false neisseriae” (e.g., N. catarrhalis) on the one hand and the “true neisseriae” on the other, with only the former groups having an important habitat in the nose. N. elongata, a rodshaped member of genus Neisseria, was not observed in this location. About 80 per cent of the N. catarrhalis and M. nonliquefaciens strains were competent in genetic transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信