酷儿的思想,酷儿的需求

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Erene Hadjiioannou, J. Saadi
{"title":"酷儿的思想,酷儿的需求","authors":"Erene Hadjiioannou, J. Saadi","doi":"10.1080/13642537.2022.2156134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Equal access to mental healthcare is a right held by all Britons, yet evidence suggests that individuals from the LGBTQIA + population have poorer experiences compared to cisgender and heterosexual clients. This is problematic when considered alongside the impact of living in a societally disempowering world. Research highlights how our mental health systems perpetuate harm to LGBTQIA+ patients. One of these systems is the institution and practice of psychotherapy. We draw on our three fold positionalities to explore what change in the practice of psychotherapy could look like. Specifically, we consider what ‘Queering’ psychotherapy might mean in order to support the growing number of individuals identifying as LGBTQIA+. We also reflect on the binaries underpinning our discipline and discuss their role in perpetuating harm during psychotherapy. We propose that binary thinking restricts understanding our clients’ needs and generates insufficient models of care. We advocate a practice of fluidity, rather than rigidity, to support equitable practice. By ‘Queering’ psychotherapy provision in Britain, we contribute to the evidence base for anti-oppressive and inclusive practice.","PeriodicalId":44564,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","volume":"34 1","pages":"12 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queer minds, Queer needs\",\"authors\":\"Erene Hadjiioannou, J. Saadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13642537.2022.2156134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Equal access to mental healthcare is a right held by all Britons, yet evidence suggests that individuals from the LGBTQIA + population have poorer experiences compared to cisgender and heterosexual clients. This is problematic when considered alongside the impact of living in a societally disempowering world. Research highlights how our mental health systems perpetuate harm to LGBTQIA+ patients. One of these systems is the institution and practice of psychotherapy. We draw on our three fold positionalities to explore what change in the practice of psychotherapy could look like. Specifically, we consider what ‘Queering’ psychotherapy might mean in order to support the growing number of individuals identifying as LGBTQIA+. We also reflect on the binaries underpinning our discipline and discuss their role in perpetuating harm during psychotherapy. We propose that binary thinking restricts understanding our clients’ needs and generates insufficient models of care. We advocate a practice of fluidity, rather than rigidity, to support equitable practice. By ‘Queering’ psychotherapy provision in Britain, we contribute to the evidence base for anti-oppressive and inclusive practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2156134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2156134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平等获得精神卫生保健是所有英国人的权利,然而有证据表明,与顺性和异性恋患者相比,LGBTQIA +人群的经历更差。考虑到生活在一个社会权力被剥夺的世界的影响,这是一个问题。研究强调了我们的精神卫生系统是如何对LGBTQIA+患者造成长期伤害的。其中一个系统是心理治疗的制度和实践。我们利用这三种立场来探索心理治疗实践中的变化是什么样子的。具体来说,我们考虑“酷儿”心理治疗可能意味着什么,以支持越来越多的LGBTQIA+个体。我们还反思了支撑我们学科的二元性,并讨论了它们在心理治疗过程中持续伤害的作用。我们认为二元思维限制了我们对客户需求的理解,并产生了不足的护理模式。我们提倡灵活而不是僵化的做法,以支持公平的做法。通过在英国提供“酷儿”心理治疗,我们为反压迫和包容性实践提供了证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Queer minds, Queer needs
ABSTRACT Equal access to mental healthcare is a right held by all Britons, yet evidence suggests that individuals from the LGBTQIA + population have poorer experiences compared to cisgender and heterosexual clients. This is problematic when considered alongside the impact of living in a societally disempowering world. Research highlights how our mental health systems perpetuate harm to LGBTQIA+ patients. One of these systems is the institution and practice of psychotherapy. We draw on our three fold positionalities to explore what change in the practice of psychotherapy could look like. Specifically, we consider what ‘Queering’ psychotherapy might mean in order to support the growing number of individuals identifying as LGBTQIA+. We also reflect on the binaries underpinning our discipline and discuss their role in perpetuating harm during psychotherapy. We propose that binary thinking restricts understanding our clients’ needs and generates insufficient models of care. We advocate a practice of fluidity, rather than rigidity, to support equitable practice. By ‘Queering’ psychotherapy provision in Britain, we contribute to the evidence base for anti-oppressive and inclusive practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信