眼内硅油质子束眼治疗:对物理光束参数的影响及EYEPLAN剂量-体积直方图中硅油的临床相关性

I. Daftari, K. Mishra, Michael I. Seider, B. Damato
{"title":"眼内硅油质子束眼治疗:对物理光束参数的影响及EYEPLAN剂量-体积直方图中硅油的临床相关性","authors":"I. Daftari, K. Mishra, Michael I. Seider, B. Damato","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2018.73029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proton \nbeam therapy (PBRT) is an essential tool in the treatment of certain ocular \ntumors due to its characteristic fall-off and sharp beam parameters at critical \nstructures. Review of clinical cases in our ocular PBRT program identified \npatients with silicone oil used as an intraocular tamponade following pars \nplana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachment. Patient’s eye may be filled \nwith silicone oil prior to PBRT for an ocular tumor. The objective of this \nstudy was to extend our knowledge of the physical characteristics of proton \nbeams in silicone oil by measuring dose within a silicone tank itself, hence \nbetter representing the surgical eye, as well as applying the range changes to \nEYEPLAN software to estimate clinical impact. The relevant proton beam physical \nparameters in silicone oil were studied using a 67.5 MeV un-modulated proton \nbeam. The beam parameters being defined included: 1) residual range; 2) \npeak/plateau ratio; 3) full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Bragg peak; and \n4) distal penumbra. Initially, the dose uniformity of the proton beam was \nconfirmed at 10 mm and 28 mm depth, corresponding to plateau and peak region of \nthe Bragg peak using Gefchromic film. Once the beam was established as expected, \nthree sets of measurements of the beam parameters were taken in: a) water (control); b) silicone-1000 oil and water; \nand c) silicone-1000 oil only. Central-axis depth-ionization measurements were \nperformed in a tank (“main tank”) with a 0.1cc ionization chamber (Model IC-18, \nFar west) having walls made of Shonka A150 plastic. The tank was 92 mm (length) × 40 mm (height) × 40 mm (depth). The tank had a 0.13 mm thick \nkapton entrance window through which the proton beam was incident. The \nionization chamber was always positioned in the center of the circular field of \ndiameter 30 mm with the phantom surface at isocenter. The ionization chamber \nmeasurements were taken at defined depths in increments of 2 mm, from 0 to 35 \nmm. To define the effect of silicone oil on the physical characteristics of \nproton beam, the above-defined three sets of measurements were made. In the \nfirst run (a), the Bragg-peak measurements were made in the main tank filled \nwith water. In the second run (b), a second smaller tank filled with 10 mm \ndepth silicone oil was placed in front of the water tank and the measurements \nwere repeated in water. In the third run (c), the water in the main tank was \nreplaced with silicone oil and the measurements were repeated in silicone \ndirectly (no second tank in runs “a” and “c”). Finally, the effects of change in range on dose distribution based on \nthe EYEPLAN® treatment planning software of patients with lesions in \nclose proximity to the disc/macula as well as ciliary body tumors were studied. \nThe uniformity of the radiation across the treatment volume shows that the \nradiation field was uniform within ± 3% at 10 mm depth and within ±4% at 28 mm \ndepth. Parameters evaluated for the three runs (a, b, c) included: 1) residual range; 2) peak/plateau ratio; 3) FWHM \nof the Bragg curve; and 4) distal penumbra. The measured data revealed that the \nun-modulated Bragg peak had a penetration at the isocenter of: a) 30 mm in water; b) 31.5 mm in silicone and \nwater; and c) 32 mm range in silicone oil. The peak/plateau ratio of the depth \ndose curve is 3.1:1 in all three set-ups. The FWHM is: a) 9 mm in water; b) 10 mm in silicone and water; \nand c) 11 mm in silicone oil. The distal penumbra (from 90% to 20%) was: a) 1.1 mm; b) \n1.4 mm; and c) 2 mm. Clinical relevance of the extended distal range in \nsilicone was studied for impact in EYEPLAN treatment software, including cases \nin which tumors were in close proximity to the optic disc/nerve and macula as \nwell as cases in which anterior ciliary body tumors were treated. The potential \nchange of range by 2 mm in silicone would impact the dose-volume histograms \n(DVH) importantly for the posterior structures. In ciliary body/anterior \ntumors, an increase in distal range in silicone could result in optic \ndisc/macula dose and length of optic nerve treated, compared with original \nEYEPLAN model DVHs. The use of silicone oil as a surgical tamponade in the \ntreatment of retinal detachments has important implications for PBRT treatment \nplanning. In patients with intraocular silicone oil, the physical parameters of \nthe beam should be closely examined and DVHs for posterior structures should be analyzed for potential increased doses to the \nmacula, disc, and length of optic nerve in the field. The change in beam \nparameters due to silicone oil is essential to consider in treatment \nplanning and DVH interpretation for ocular patients with posterior as well as \nanterior ocular tumors.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton Beam Ocular Treatment in Eyes with Intraocular Silicone Oil: Effects on Physical Beam Parameters and Clinical Relevance of Silicone Oil in EYEPLAN Dose-Volume Histograms\",\"authors\":\"I. Daftari, K. Mishra, Michael I. Seider, B. Damato\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2018.73029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proton \\nbeam therapy (PBRT) is an essential tool in the treatment of certain ocular \\ntumors due to its characteristic fall-off and sharp beam parameters at critical \\nstructures. Review of clinical cases in our ocular PBRT program identified \\npatients with silicone oil used as an intraocular tamponade following pars \\nplana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachment. Patient’s eye may be filled \\nwith silicone oil prior to PBRT for an ocular tumor. The objective of this \\nstudy was to extend our knowledge of the physical characteristics of proton \\nbeams in silicone oil by measuring dose within a silicone tank itself, hence \\nbetter representing the surgical eye, as well as applying the range changes to \\nEYEPLAN software to estimate clinical impact. The relevant proton beam physical \\nparameters in silicone oil were studied using a 67.5 MeV un-modulated proton \\nbeam. The beam parameters being defined included: 1) residual range; 2) \\npeak/plateau ratio; 3) full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Bragg peak; and \\n4) distal penumbra. Initially, the dose uniformity of the proton beam was \\nconfirmed at 10 mm and 28 mm depth, corresponding to plateau and peak region of \\nthe Bragg peak using Gefchromic film. Once the beam was established as expected, \\nthree sets of measurements of the beam parameters were taken in: a) water (control); b) silicone-1000 oil and water; \\nand c) silicone-1000 oil only. Central-axis depth-ionization measurements were \\nperformed in a tank (“main tank”) with a 0.1cc ionization chamber (Model IC-18, \\nFar west) having walls made of Shonka A150 plastic. The tank was 92 mm (length) × 40 mm (height) × 40 mm (depth). The tank had a 0.13 mm thick \\nkapton entrance window through which the proton beam was incident. The \\nionization chamber was always positioned in the center of the circular field of \\ndiameter 30 mm with the phantom surface at isocenter. The ionization chamber \\nmeasurements were taken at defined depths in increments of 2 mm, from 0 to 35 \\nmm. To define the effect of silicone oil on the physical characteristics of \\nproton beam, the above-defined three sets of measurements were made. In the \\nfirst run (a), the Bragg-peak measurements were made in the main tank filled \\nwith water. In the second run (b), a second smaller tank filled with 10 mm \\ndepth silicone oil was placed in front of the water tank and the measurements \\nwere repeated in water. In the third run (c), the water in the main tank was \\nreplaced with silicone oil and the measurements were repeated in silicone \\ndirectly (no second tank in runs “a” and “c”). Finally, the effects of change in range on dose distribution based on \\nthe EYEPLAN® treatment planning software of patients with lesions in \\nclose proximity to the disc/macula as well as ciliary body tumors were studied. \\nThe uniformity of the radiation across the treatment volume shows that the \\nradiation field was uniform within ± 3% at 10 mm depth and within ±4% at 28 mm \\ndepth. Parameters evaluated for the three runs (a, b, c) included: 1) residual range; 2) peak/plateau ratio; 3) FWHM \\nof the Bragg curve; and 4) distal penumbra. The measured data revealed that the \\nun-modulated Bragg peak had a penetration at the isocenter of: a) 30 mm in water; b) 31.5 mm in silicone and \\nwater; and c) 32 mm range in silicone oil. The peak/plateau ratio of the depth \\ndose curve is 3.1:1 in all three set-ups. The FWHM is: a) 9 mm in water; b) 10 mm in silicone and water; \\nand c) 11 mm in silicone oil. The distal penumbra (from 90% to 20%) was: a) 1.1 mm; b) \\n1.4 mm; and c) 2 mm. Clinical relevance of the extended distal range in \\nsilicone was studied for impact in EYEPLAN treatment software, including cases \\nin which tumors were in close proximity to the optic disc/nerve and macula as \\nwell as cases in which anterior ciliary body tumors were treated. The potential \\nchange of range by 2 mm in silicone would impact the dose-volume histograms \\n(DVH) importantly for the posterior structures. In ciliary body/anterior \\ntumors, an increase in distal range in silicone could result in optic \\ndisc/macula dose and length of optic nerve treated, compared with original \\nEYEPLAN model DVHs. The use of silicone oil as a surgical tamponade in the \\ntreatment of retinal detachments has important implications for PBRT treatment \\nplanning. In patients with intraocular silicone oil, the physical parameters of \\nthe beam should be closely examined and DVHs for posterior structures should be analyzed for potential increased doses to the \\nmacula, disc, and length of optic nerve in the field. The change in beam \\nparameters due to silicone oil is essential to consider in treatment \\nplanning and DVH interpretation for ocular patients with posterior as well as \\nanterior ocular tumors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2018.73029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2018.73029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

质子束治疗(PBRT)由于其在关键结构处具有独特的衰减和尖锐的光束参数而成为治疗某些眼部肿瘤的重要工具。回顾我们的眼部PBRT项目的临床病例,确定了在玻璃体切割手术后使用硅油作为眼内填塞修复视网膜脱离的患者。患者的眼睛可能会充满硅油之前PBRT眼肿瘤。本研究的目的是通过测量硅胶罐本身的剂量来扩展我们对硅油中质子束物理特性的了解,从而更好地代表手术眼睛,并将范围变化应用于EYEPLAN软件来估计临床影响。采用67.5 MeV非调制质子束,研究了硅油中质子束的相关物理参数。所定义的光束参数包括:1)残差;2)峰平台比;3)布拉格峰半峰全宽;4)远端半暗带。首先,利用Gefchromic薄膜确定了质子束在10 mm和28 mm深度处的剂量均匀性,对应于Bragg峰的平台区和峰区。一旦光束按预期建立,对光束参数进行三组测量:a)水(对照);B)硅油-1000油和水;c)只使用硅-1000油。中轴深度电离测量是在一个带有0.1cc电离室(型号IC-18, Far west)的储罐(“主储罐”)中进行的,电离室的壁由Shonka A150塑料制成。坦克尺寸为92毫米(长)× 40毫米(高)× 40毫米(深)。该储罐有一个0.13毫米厚的卡普顿入口窗口,质子束通过该窗口入射。电离室始终位于直径为30mm的圆形场的中心,幻影表面在中心位置。电离室测量在规定的深度以2毫米的增量进行,从0到35毫米。为了确定硅油对质子束物理特性的影响,进行了上述三组测量。在第一次运行(a)中,在装满水的主水箱中进行布拉格峰测量。在第二轮(b)中,在水箱前面放置了第二个较小的装有10毫米深硅油的水箱,并在水中重复测量。在第三次运行(c)中,将主水箱中的水替换为硅油,并直接在硅胶中重复测量(运行“a”和“c”时没有第二个水箱)。最后,基于EYEPLAN®治疗计划软件,对椎间盘/黄斑附近病变及睫状体肿瘤患者,研究范围变化对剂量分布的影响。辐射在整个治疗体中的均匀性表明,辐射场在10 mm深度为±3%,在28 mm深度为±4%。三次运行(a、b、c)评估的参数包括:1)残差;2)峰平台比;3) Bragg曲线的FWHM;4)远端半暗带。测量数据表明,未调制布拉格峰在水中等中心处的穿透量为:a) 30 mm;B) 31.5 mm的硅胶和水;c) 32毫米范围的硅油。在所有三种设置中,深度剂量曲线的峰/平台比为3.1:1。FWHM为:a)水中9 mm;B) 10毫米的硅胶和水;c) 11毫米的硅油。远端半暗区(90% ~ 20%)为:a) 1.1 mm;B) 1.4 mm;c) 2毫米。在EYEPLAN治疗软件中,我们研究了硅胶远端延伸范围的临床相关性,包括肿瘤靠近视盘/神经和黄斑的病例,以及治疗前睫状体肿瘤的病例。硅胶中2 mm范围的电位变化会对后侧结构的剂量-体积直方图(DVH)产生重要影响。在睫状体/前侧肿瘤中,与原始EYEPLAN模型DVHs相比,硅胶远端范围的增加可导致视盘/黄斑剂量和视神经长度的增加。使用硅油作为手术填塞治疗视网膜脱离对PBRT治疗计划具有重要意义。在使用眼内硅油的患者中,应密切检查光束的物理参数,并分析后方结构的dvh,以确定对黄斑、椎间盘和视神经长度的潜在增加剂量。由于硅油引起的光束参数的变化在治疗计划和DVH解释中对于患有眼后和眼前肿瘤的患者是必不可少的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proton Beam Ocular Treatment in Eyes with Intraocular Silicone Oil: Effects on Physical Beam Parameters and Clinical Relevance of Silicone Oil in EYEPLAN Dose-Volume Histograms
Proton beam therapy (PBRT) is an essential tool in the treatment of certain ocular tumors due to its characteristic fall-off and sharp beam parameters at critical structures. Review of clinical cases in our ocular PBRT program identified patients with silicone oil used as an intraocular tamponade following pars plana vitrectomy for repair of retinal detachment. Patient’s eye may be filled with silicone oil prior to PBRT for an ocular tumor. The objective of this study was to extend our knowledge of the physical characteristics of proton beams in silicone oil by measuring dose within a silicone tank itself, hence better representing the surgical eye, as well as applying the range changes to EYEPLAN software to estimate clinical impact. The relevant proton beam physical parameters in silicone oil were studied using a 67.5 MeV un-modulated proton beam. The beam parameters being defined included: 1) residual range; 2) peak/plateau ratio; 3) full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Bragg peak; and 4) distal penumbra. Initially, the dose uniformity of the proton beam was confirmed at 10 mm and 28 mm depth, corresponding to plateau and peak region of the Bragg peak using Gefchromic film. Once the beam was established as expected, three sets of measurements of the beam parameters were taken in: a) water (control); b) silicone-1000 oil and water; and c) silicone-1000 oil only. Central-axis depth-ionization measurements were performed in a tank (“main tank”) with a 0.1cc ionization chamber (Model IC-18, Far west) having walls made of Shonka A150 plastic. The tank was 92 mm (length) × 40 mm (height) × 40 mm (depth). The tank had a 0.13 mm thick kapton entrance window through which the proton beam was incident. The ionization chamber was always positioned in the center of the circular field of diameter 30 mm with the phantom surface at isocenter. The ionization chamber measurements were taken at defined depths in increments of 2 mm, from 0 to 35 mm. To define the effect of silicone oil on the physical characteristics of proton beam, the above-defined three sets of measurements were made. In the first run (a), the Bragg-peak measurements were made in the main tank filled with water. In the second run (b), a second smaller tank filled with 10 mm depth silicone oil was placed in front of the water tank and the measurements were repeated in water. In the third run (c), the water in the main tank was replaced with silicone oil and the measurements were repeated in silicone directly (no second tank in runs “a” and “c”). Finally, the effects of change in range on dose distribution based on the EYEPLAN® treatment planning software of patients with lesions in close proximity to the disc/macula as well as ciliary body tumors were studied. The uniformity of the radiation across the treatment volume shows that the radiation field was uniform within ± 3% at 10 mm depth and within ±4% at 28 mm depth. Parameters evaluated for the three runs (a, b, c) included: 1) residual range; 2) peak/plateau ratio; 3) FWHM of the Bragg curve; and 4) distal penumbra. The measured data revealed that the un-modulated Bragg peak had a penetration at the isocenter of: a) 30 mm in water; b) 31.5 mm in silicone and water; and c) 32 mm range in silicone oil. The peak/plateau ratio of the depth dose curve is 3.1:1 in all three set-ups. The FWHM is: a) 9 mm in water; b) 10 mm in silicone and water; and c) 11 mm in silicone oil. The distal penumbra (from 90% to 20%) was: a) 1.1 mm; b) 1.4 mm; and c) 2 mm. Clinical relevance of the extended distal range in silicone was studied for impact in EYEPLAN treatment software, including cases in which tumors were in close proximity to the optic disc/nerve and macula as well as cases in which anterior ciliary body tumors were treated. The potential change of range by 2 mm in silicone would impact the dose-volume histograms (DVH) importantly for the posterior structures. In ciliary body/anterior tumors, an increase in distal range in silicone could result in optic disc/macula dose and length of optic nerve treated, compared with original EYEPLAN model DVHs. The use of silicone oil as a surgical tamponade in the treatment of retinal detachments has important implications for PBRT treatment planning. In patients with intraocular silicone oil, the physical parameters of the beam should be closely examined and DVHs for posterior structures should be analyzed for potential increased doses to the macula, disc, and length of optic nerve in the field. The change in beam parameters due to silicone oil is essential to consider in treatment planning and DVH interpretation for ocular patients with posterior as well as anterior ocular tumors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信