{"title":"医疗保险福利:重新评估。","authors":"W. Hsiao, N. Kelly","doi":"10.2307/3349824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in beneficiary cost-sharing provisions must be part of any multi-faceted strategy for Medicare's fiscal solvency . The current flawed benefit structure is seen as inefficient, inequitable , and contrary to prudent insurance principles. An income-related and selective increase in cost-sharing, combined with maximum liability, is proposed.","PeriodicalId":76697,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","volume":"9 1","pages":"207-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare benefits: a reassessment.\",\"authors\":\"W. Hsiao, N. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3349824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Changes in beneficiary cost-sharing provisions must be part of any multi-faceted strategy for Medicare's fiscal solvency . The current flawed benefit structure is seen as inefficient, inequitable , and contrary to prudent insurance principles. An income-related and selective increase in cost-sharing, combined with maximum liability, is proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"207-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3349824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3349824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Changes in beneficiary cost-sharing provisions must be part of any multi-faceted strategy for Medicare's fiscal solvency . The current flawed benefit structure is seen as inefficient, inequitable , and contrary to prudent insurance principles. An income-related and selective increase in cost-sharing, combined with maximum liability, is proposed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
