{"title":"温度对弹性体线性尺寸稳定性的影响","authors":"Geerts Greta Maria, Muller Susanne Sanette","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.129005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. Materials and Methods: Polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impressions of an International Organization for Standardization-specified test-block were photographed at two temperatures and 3 time intervals. This resulted in 12 groups (n = 10). Images were digitally calibrated and measured. Mean percentage dimensional change (%DC) was analyzed using the Variance Estimation and Precision module of Statistica 10 (Statsoft®, Southern Africa) (95% confidence), with Fisher least significant difference correction for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results: For silicone, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = 0.006). This was significantly better than all other silicone groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.237) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.300), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.187). For polyether, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = −0.272). This was significantly better than all other polyether groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.364) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.306), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.199). Comparing polyether with silicone, %DC did not differ between the two materials when kept at 21°C for 14 days and when cooled-off after heat exposure for 8 h. At all other instances, the %DC between the two materials differed, with silicone always closest to zero %DC. Conclusions: Exposing silicone and polyether to high temperature doesn′t lead to higher dimensional inaccuracy on the short-term compared to keeping them at 21°C. However, heat has an effect on shelf-life (14 days) of impressions, decreasing accuracy. This effect is worse for polyether.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"6 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of temperature on linear dimensional stability of elastomers\",\"authors\":\"Geerts Greta Maria, Muller Susanne Sanette\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2321-4619.129005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. Materials and Methods: Polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impressions of an International Organization for Standardization-specified test-block were photographed at two temperatures and 3 time intervals. This resulted in 12 groups (n = 10). Images were digitally calibrated and measured. Mean percentage dimensional change (%DC) was analyzed using the Variance Estimation and Precision module of Statistica 10 (Statsoft®, Southern Africa) (95% confidence), with Fisher least significant difference correction for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results: For silicone, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = 0.006). This was significantly better than all other silicone groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.237) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.300), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.187). For polyether, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = −0.272). This was significantly better than all other polyether groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.364) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.306), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.199). Comparing polyether with silicone, %DC did not differ between the two materials when kept at 21°C for 14 days and when cooled-off after heat exposure for 8 h. At all other instances, the %DC between the two materials differed, with silicone always closest to zero %DC. Conclusions: Exposing silicone and polyether to high temperature doesn′t lead to higher dimensional inaccuracy on the short-term compared to keeping them at 21°C. However, heat has an effect on shelf-life (14 days) of impressions, decreasing accuracy. This effect is worse for polyether.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.129005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.129005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of temperature on linear dimensional stability of elastomers
Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. Materials and Methods: Polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impressions of an International Organization for Standardization-specified test-block were photographed at two temperatures and 3 time intervals. This resulted in 12 groups (n = 10). Images were digitally calibrated and measured. Mean percentage dimensional change (%DC) was analyzed using the Variance Estimation and Precision module of Statistica 10 (Statsoft®, Southern Africa) (95% confidence), with Fisher least significant difference correction for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results: For silicone, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = 0.006). This was significantly better than all other silicone groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.237) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.300), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.187). For polyether, dimensional accuracy was highest when stored at 21°C for 14 days (%DC = −0.272). This was significantly better than all other polyether groups (P < 0.05). Dimensional accuracy was worst when stored at 21°C for 8 h (%DC = 0.364) and after cooling-off from 66°C (%DC = 0.306), with no difference between latter groups (P = 0.199). Comparing polyether with silicone, %DC did not differ between the two materials when kept at 21°C for 14 days and when cooled-off after heat exposure for 8 h. At all other instances, the %DC between the two materials differed, with silicone always closest to zero %DC. Conclusions: Exposing silicone and polyether to high temperature doesn′t lead to higher dimensional inaccuracy on the short-term compared to keeping them at 21°C. However, heat has an effect on shelf-life (14 days) of impressions, decreasing accuracy. This effect is worse for polyether.