无人机声测向方法分析

IF 0.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
V. Kartashov, M. Rybnykov, A. Kartashov, V.A. Pososhenko
{"title":"无人机声测向方法分析","authors":"V. Kartashov, M. Rybnykov, A. Kartashov, V.A. Pososhenko","doi":"10.30837/rt.2022.3.210.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, classical means of detecting objects do not provide the necessary efficiency for detecting small UAVs, and acoustic location among the known methods for their observation is the most cost-effective solution. \nThe article analyzes the well-known methods of direction finding of acoustic signals in order to select algorithms for processing UAV signals. Obtaining qualitative indicators of the analyzed algorithms was carried out by the method of statistical computer modeling in the Matlab environment. \nBased on the simulation results, it is shown that classical methods are the most stable under conditions of low signal-to-noise ratios. The GCC-PHAT direction finding algorithm, based on determining the difference in the time of arrival of a signal at spaced points, is computationally economical and simple enough to determine the direction to the UAV, but it is not capable of distinguishing more than one radiation source within the diagram orientation. Beamforming methods are also relatively easy to implement and computationally efficient, and are more robust at low signal-to-noise ratios. The SRP-NAM algorithm has a greater accuracy in determining angles than SRP-PHAT, so it can be an adequate replacement for the SRP-PHAT algorithm. \nHigh-resolution methods provide better directional resolution than classical methods, which, in the case of a limited microphone array aperture, is a positive factor in the design of an UAV direction finding station. High resolution methods were considered: non-coherent MUSIC, non-coherent normalized MUSIC and TOPS method. It is shown that incoherent MUSIC gives poor results in distinguishing close UAV signals, since unequal estimates of the entire frequency range are concentrated during bearing formation. The incoherent normalized MUSIC algorithm is able to efficiently use the entire frequency range of the UAV acoustic signal. The TOPS algorithm is inferior to the incoherent normalized MUSIC algorithm, and on the other hand, it does not require a priori estimates of the number of radiation sources.","PeriodicalId":41675,"journal":{"name":"Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of acoustic direction finding methods for unmanned aerial vehicles\",\"authors\":\"V. Kartashov, M. Rybnykov, A. Kartashov, V.A. Pososhenko\",\"doi\":\"10.30837/rt.2022.3.210.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, classical means of detecting objects do not provide the necessary efficiency for detecting small UAVs, and acoustic location among the known methods for their observation is the most cost-effective solution. \\nThe article analyzes the well-known methods of direction finding of acoustic signals in order to select algorithms for processing UAV signals. Obtaining qualitative indicators of the analyzed algorithms was carried out by the method of statistical computer modeling in the Matlab environment. \\nBased on the simulation results, it is shown that classical methods are the most stable under conditions of low signal-to-noise ratios. The GCC-PHAT direction finding algorithm, based on determining the difference in the time of arrival of a signal at spaced points, is computationally economical and simple enough to determine the direction to the UAV, but it is not capable of distinguishing more than one radiation source within the diagram orientation. Beamforming methods are also relatively easy to implement and computationally efficient, and are more robust at low signal-to-noise ratios. The SRP-NAM algorithm has a greater accuracy in determining angles than SRP-PHAT, so it can be an adequate replacement for the SRP-PHAT algorithm. \\nHigh-resolution methods provide better directional resolution than classical methods, which, in the case of a limited microphone array aperture, is a positive factor in the design of an UAV direction finding station. High resolution methods were considered: non-coherent MUSIC, non-coherent normalized MUSIC and TOPS method. It is shown that incoherent MUSIC gives poor results in distinguishing close UAV signals, since unequal estimates of the entire frequency range are concentrated during bearing formation. The incoherent normalized MUSIC algorithm is able to efficiently use the entire frequency range of the UAV acoustic signal. The TOPS algorithm is inferior to the incoherent normalized MUSIC algorithm, and on the other hand, it does not require a priori estimates of the number of radiation sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30837/rt.2022.3.210.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30837/rt.2022.3.210.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,传统的目标探测手段无法为小型无人机的探测提供必要的效率,在已知的观测方法中,声学定位是最具成本效益的解决方案。分析了常用的声信号测向方法,以选择适合无人机信号处理的算法。在Matlab环境下,通过统计计算机建模的方法获得所分析算法的定性指标。仿真结果表明,在低信噪比条件下,经典方法是最稳定的。GCC-PHAT测向算法基于确定间隔点上信号到达时间的差异,在计算上足够经济和简单,可以确定无人机的方向,但它不能在图方向内区分多个辐射源。波束形成方法也相对容易实现和计算效率高,并且在低信噪比下更具鲁棒性。与SRP-PHAT相比,SRP-NAM算法在确定角度方面具有更高的精度,因此可以作为SRP-PHAT算法的合适替代品。高分辨率方法提供了比传统方法更好的方向分辨率,在麦克风阵列孔径有限的情况下,这是无人机测向站设计的一个积极因素。考虑了高分辨率方法:非相干MUSIC、非相干归一化MUSIC和TOPS方法。结果表明,非相干MUSIC在识别近距离无人机信号方面效果不佳,因为在方位形成过程中,整个频率范围的不相等估计集中在一起。非相干归一化MUSIC算法能够有效地利用无人机声信号的整个频率范围。TOPS算法优于非相干归一化MUSIC算法,另一方面,它不需要对辐射源的数量进行先验估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of acoustic direction finding methods for unmanned aerial vehicles
Currently, classical means of detecting objects do not provide the necessary efficiency for detecting small UAVs, and acoustic location among the known methods for their observation is the most cost-effective solution. The article analyzes the well-known methods of direction finding of acoustic signals in order to select algorithms for processing UAV signals. Obtaining qualitative indicators of the analyzed algorithms was carried out by the method of statistical computer modeling in the Matlab environment. Based on the simulation results, it is shown that classical methods are the most stable under conditions of low signal-to-noise ratios. The GCC-PHAT direction finding algorithm, based on determining the difference in the time of arrival of a signal at spaced points, is computationally economical and simple enough to determine the direction to the UAV, but it is not capable of distinguishing more than one radiation source within the diagram orientation. Beamforming methods are also relatively easy to implement and computationally efficient, and are more robust at low signal-to-noise ratios. The SRP-NAM algorithm has a greater accuracy in determining angles than SRP-PHAT, so it can be an adequate replacement for the SRP-PHAT algorithm. High-resolution methods provide better directional resolution than classical methods, which, in the case of a limited microphone array aperture, is a positive factor in the design of an UAV direction finding station. High resolution methods were considered: non-coherent MUSIC, non-coherent normalized MUSIC and TOPS method. It is shown that incoherent MUSIC gives poor results in distinguishing close UAV signals, since unequal estimates of the entire frequency range are concentrated during bearing formation. The incoherent normalized MUSIC algorithm is able to efficiently use the entire frequency range of the UAV acoustic signal. The TOPS algorithm is inferior to the incoherent normalized MUSIC algorithm, and on the other hand, it does not require a priori estimates of the number of radiation sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia
Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信