{"title":"《市场营销科学文章评论:Anpad科学委员会的提案》(2015-2016)","authors":"V. Brei, S. Farias, C. Matos, J. Mazzon","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2604521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portuguese Abstract: Nesse artigo, o Comite Cientifico de Marketing da ANPAD (2015-2016) propoe um conjunto de reflexoes e sugestoes para avaliacao e elaboracao de pareceres para artigos cientificos submetidos aos congressos e aos periodicos cientificos de marketing. Analisamos o processo de submissao e revisao de artigos nos principais congressos – o Encontro Nacional da ANPAD (EnANPAD) e o Encontro de Marketing da ANPAD (EMA) – e periodicos de marketing. Mostramos quais sao os diferentes papeis e como atuam num processo de revisao os cientistas da academia brasileira de marketing – autores, editores, revisores, Comite Cientifico e Lideres de Tema da ANPAD. Tracamos algumas sugestoes a respeito do comportamento/postura de um revisor e analisamos quais sao os elementos essenciais de um bom artigo. Por fim, propomos uma grade de avaliacao (criterios) com o objetivo de ajudar os revisores a elaborarem seus pareceres a pesquisas teorico-empiricas, ensaios teoricos e casos de ensino.English Abstract: The ANPAD's Marketing Scintific Comitee (2015-2016) proposes a set of reflections and suggestions for evaluation and review of scientific papers submitted to the marketing congress and scientific journals. We analyze the submission and peer-review process in the most important Brazilian marketing congresses (ENANPAD and EMA). We show the different roles and how each scientist of the Brazilian marketing academy -- authors, editors, reviewers, Scientific Committee, and Theme Leaders -- participate in the review process. We develop some suggestions about the behavior/actions of the reviewers, and analyze which are the essential elements of a good academic paper. Finally, we propose a evaluation framework to help reviewers to elaborate their paper evaluations of about theoretical-empirical, and theoretical papers, as well as case studies.","PeriodicalId":23435,"journal":{"name":"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avaliação De Artigos Científicos EM Marketing: Uma Proposição Do Comitê Científico De Marketing Da Anpad (2015-2016) (Review of Scientific Articles in Marketing: A Proposition of the Anpad's Sciencifc Committee (2015-2016))\",\"authors\":\"V. Brei, S. Farias, C. Matos, J. Mazzon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2604521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Portuguese Abstract: Nesse artigo, o Comite Cientifico de Marketing da ANPAD (2015-2016) propoe um conjunto de reflexoes e sugestoes para avaliacao e elaboracao de pareceres para artigos cientificos submetidos aos congressos e aos periodicos cientificos de marketing. Analisamos o processo de submissao e revisao de artigos nos principais congressos – o Encontro Nacional da ANPAD (EnANPAD) e o Encontro de Marketing da ANPAD (EMA) – e periodicos de marketing. Mostramos quais sao os diferentes papeis e como atuam num processo de revisao os cientistas da academia brasileira de marketing – autores, editores, revisores, Comite Cientifico e Lideres de Tema da ANPAD. Tracamos algumas sugestoes a respeito do comportamento/postura de um revisor e analisamos quais sao os elementos essenciais de um bom artigo. Por fim, propomos uma grade de avaliacao (criterios) com o objetivo de ajudar os revisores a elaborarem seus pareceres a pesquisas teorico-empiricas, ensaios teoricos e casos de ensino.English Abstract: The ANPAD's Marketing Scintific Comitee (2015-2016) proposes a set of reflections and suggestions for evaluation and review of scientific papers submitted to the marketing congress and scientific journals. We analyze the submission and peer-review process in the most important Brazilian marketing congresses (ENANPAD and EMA). We show the different roles and how each scientist of the Brazilian marketing academy -- authors, editors, reviewers, Scientific Committee, and Theme Leaders -- participate in the review process. We develop some suggestions about the behavior/actions of the reviewers, and analyze which are the essential elements of a good academic paper. Finally, we propose a evaluation framework to help reviewers to elaborate their paper evaluations of about theoretical-empirical, and theoretical papers, as well as case studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2604521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2604521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Avaliação De Artigos Científicos EM Marketing: Uma Proposição Do Comitê Científico De Marketing Da Anpad (2015-2016) (Review of Scientific Articles in Marketing: A Proposition of the Anpad's Sciencifc Committee (2015-2016))
Portuguese Abstract: Nesse artigo, o Comite Cientifico de Marketing da ANPAD (2015-2016) propoe um conjunto de reflexoes e sugestoes para avaliacao e elaboracao de pareceres para artigos cientificos submetidos aos congressos e aos periodicos cientificos de marketing. Analisamos o processo de submissao e revisao de artigos nos principais congressos – o Encontro Nacional da ANPAD (EnANPAD) e o Encontro de Marketing da ANPAD (EMA) – e periodicos de marketing. Mostramos quais sao os diferentes papeis e como atuam num processo de revisao os cientistas da academia brasileira de marketing – autores, editores, revisores, Comite Cientifico e Lideres de Tema da ANPAD. Tracamos algumas sugestoes a respeito do comportamento/postura de um revisor e analisamos quais sao os elementos essenciais de um bom artigo. Por fim, propomos uma grade de avaliacao (criterios) com o objetivo de ajudar os revisores a elaborarem seus pareceres a pesquisas teorico-empiricas, ensaios teoricos e casos de ensino.English Abstract: The ANPAD's Marketing Scintific Comitee (2015-2016) proposes a set of reflections and suggestions for evaluation and review of scientific papers submitted to the marketing congress and scientific journals. We analyze the submission and peer-review process in the most important Brazilian marketing congresses (ENANPAD and EMA). We show the different roles and how each scientist of the Brazilian marketing academy -- authors, editors, reviewers, Scientific Committee, and Theme Leaders -- participate in the review process. We develop some suggestions about the behavior/actions of the reviewers, and analyze which are the essential elements of a good academic paper. Finally, we propose a evaluation framework to help reviewers to elaborate their paper evaluations of about theoretical-empirical, and theoretical papers, as well as case studies.