含损失数据场景集成的卷积算子在操作风险建模中的应用

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Pavan Aroda, A. Guergachi, Huaxiong Huang
{"title":"含损失数据场景集成的卷积算子在操作风险建模中的应用","authors":"Pavan Aroda, A. Guergachi, Huaxiong Huang","doi":"10.21314/jop.2015.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When using the advanced measurement approach to determine required regulatory capital for operational risk, expert opinion is applied via scenario analysis to help quantify exposure to high-severity events. A methodology is presented that makes use of the convolution operator to integrate scenarios into a baseline model. Using a baseline loss distribution model calibrated on historical losses and a scenario-derived loss distribution calibrated on scenario data points, the addition of both random processes equates to the convolution of the corresponding densities. Using an analogy from digital signal processing, the commutative property of convolution allows one function to smooth and average the other. The inherent uncertainty in scenario analysis has caused concern amongst practitioners when too much emphasis has been placed on absolutes in terms of quantified frequency/severity estimates. This method addresses this uncertainty and produces a combined loss distribution that takes information from the entire domain of the calibrated scenario distribution. The necessary theory is provided within and an example is shown to provide context.","PeriodicalId":54030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operational Risk","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Convolution Operator for Scenario Integration with Loss Data in Operational Risk Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Pavan Aroda, A. Guergachi, Huaxiong Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/jop.2015.168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When using the advanced measurement approach to determine required regulatory capital for operational risk, expert opinion is applied via scenario analysis to help quantify exposure to high-severity events. A methodology is presented that makes use of the convolution operator to integrate scenarios into a baseline model. Using a baseline loss distribution model calibrated on historical losses and a scenario-derived loss distribution calibrated on scenario data points, the addition of both random processes equates to the convolution of the corresponding densities. Using an analogy from digital signal processing, the commutative property of convolution allows one function to smooth and average the other. The inherent uncertainty in scenario analysis has caused concern amongst practitioners when too much emphasis has been placed on absolutes in terms of quantified frequency/severity estimates. This method addresses this uncertainty and produces a combined loss distribution that takes information from the entire domain of the calibrated scenario distribution. The necessary theory is provided within and an example is shown to provide context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/jop.2015.168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operational Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/jop.2015.168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当使用先进的测量方法来确定操作风险所需的监管资本时,通过场景分析应用专家意见来帮助量化高严重性事件的风险。提出了一种利用卷积算子将场景集成到基线模型中的方法。使用基于历史损失校准的基线损失分布模型和基于场景数据点校准的情景衍生损失分布,这两个随机过程的相加等于相应密度的卷积。利用数字信号处理的类比,卷积的交换性允许一个函数平滑和平均另一个函数。场景分析中固有的不确定性已经引起了实践者的关注,因为在量化频率/严重程度估计方面过分强调绝对。该方法解决了这种不确定性,并产生了一个综合损失分布,该分布从校准情景分布的整个域获取信息。本书提供了必要的理论,并给出了一个例子来提供上下文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the Convolution Operator for Scenario Integration with Loss Data in Operational Risk Modeling
When using the advanced measurement approach to determine required regulatory capital for operational risk, expert opinion is applied via scenario analysis to help quantify exposure to high-severity events. A methodology is presented that makes use of the convolution operator to integrate scenarios into a baseline model. Using a baseline loss distribution model calibrated on historical losses and a scenario-derived loss distribution calibrated on scenario data points, the addition of both random processes equates to the convolution of the corresponding densities. Using an analogy from digital signal processing, the commutative property of convolution allows one function to smooth and average the other. The inherent uncertainty in scenario analysis has caused concern amongst practitioners when too much emphasis has been placed on absolutes in terms of quantified frequency/severity estimates. This method addresses this uncertainty and produces a combined loss distribution that takes information from the entire domain of the calibrated scenario distribution. The necessary theory is provided within and an example is shown to provide context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Operational Risk
Journal of Operational Risk BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
40.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: In December 2017, the Basel Committee published the final version of its standardized measurement approach (SMA) methodology, which will replace the approaches set out in Basel II (ie, the simpler standardized approaches and advanced measurement approach (AMA) that allowed use of internal models) from January 1, 2022. Independently of the Basel III rules, in order to manage and mitigate risks, they still need to be measurable by anyone. The operational risk industry needs to keep that in mind. While the purpose of the now defunct AMA was to find out the level of regulatory capital to protect a firm against operational risks, we still can – and should – use models to estimate operational risk economic capital. Without these, the task of managing and mitigating capital would be incredibly difficult. These internal models are now unshackled from regulatory requirements and can be optimized for managing the daily risks to which financial institutions are exposed. In addition, operational risk models can and should be used for stress tests and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The Journal of Operational Risk also welcomes papers on nonfinancial risks as well as topics including, but not limited to, the following. The modeling and management of operational risk. Recent advances in techniques used to model operational risk, eg, copulas, correlation, aggregate loss distributions, Bayesian methods and extreme value theory. The pricing and hedging of operational risk and/or any risk transfer techniques. Data modeling external loss data, business control factors and scenario analysis. Models used to aggregate different types of data. Causal models that link key risk indicators and macroeconomic factors to operational losses. Regulatory issues, such as Basel II or any other local regulatory issue. Enterprise risk management. Cyber risk. Big data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信