在高分辨率卫星图像上使用支持向量机、随机森林和最大似然分类器进行滑坡识别:以巴西东南部Itaóca为例

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
H. C. Dias, L. Sandre, Diego Alejandro Satizábal Alarcón, C. Grohmann, J. A. Quintanilha
{"title":"在高分辨率卫星图像上使用支持向量机、随机森林和最大似然分类器进行滑坡识别:以巴西东南部Itaóca为例","authors":"H. C. Dias, L. Sandre, Diego Alejandro Satizábal Alarcón, C. Grohmann, J. A. Quintanilha","doi":"10.1590/2317-4889202120200105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Landslide identification is important for understanding their conditioning factors, and for constructing susceptibility, risk, and vulnerability maps. In remote sensing this can be accomplished manually or through classifiers. This study compares three image classifiers (Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) used in identifying landslides in Itaóca (São Paulo, Brazil). Two datasets were used: a RapidEye-5 (5 m) image and a Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) (12.5 m). Seven pixel-based classifications were produced, two for each classifier and a binary class that identified only landslides and non-landslides. One classification contained five spectral bands (5B), while the other contained six bands (6B) and included the slope derived from the DEM. The results were validated using Kappa index and F1 score. The SVM 6B classification achieved the best results among the validation indices used herein. It identified a landslide area of 399,325 m². The results contribute to landslide mapping in tropical environments using pixel-based classifiers. However, although the SVM classification was successful, only landslides with larger areas were captured by the algorithms, con-firming the importance of conducting further analyses using images with finer spatial resolution.","PeriodicalId":9221,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landslide recognition using SVM, Random Forest, and Maximum Likelihood classifiers on high-resolution satellite images: A case study of Itaóca, southeastern Brazil\",\"authors\":\"H. C. Dias, L. Sandre, Diego Alejandro Satizábal Alarcón, C. Grohmann, J. A. Quintanilha\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2317-4889202120200105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Landslide identification is important for understanding their conditioning factors, and for constructing susceptibility, risk, and vulnerability maps. In remote sensing this can be accomplished manually or through classifiers. This study compares three image classifiers (Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) used in identifying landslides in Itaóca (São Paulo, Brazil). Two datasets were used: a RapidEye-5 (5 m) image and a Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) (12.5 m). Seven pixel-based classifications were produced, two for each classifier and a binary class that identified only landslides and non-landslides. One classification contained five spectral bands (5B), while the other contained six bands (6B) and included the slope derived from the DEM. The results were validated using Kappa index and F1 score. The SVM 6B classification achieved the best results among the validation indices used herein. It identified a landslide area of 399,325 m². The results contribute to landslide mapping in tropical environments using pixel-based classifiers. However, although the SVM classification was successful, only landslides with larger areas were captured by the algorithms, con-firming the importance of conducting further analyses using images with finer spatial resolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Geology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-4889202120200105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-4889202120200105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

滑坡识别对于了解其制约因素,以及构建易感性、风险和脆弱性地图具有重要意义。在遥感中,这可以手动完成或通过分类器完成。本研究比较了用于识别Itaóca(巴西圣保罗)滑坡的三种图像分类器(最大似然、随机森林和支持向量机(SVM))。使用了两个数据集:RapidEye-5(5米)图像和航天飞机雷达地形任务(SRTM)数字高程模型(DEM)(12.5米)。生成了7个基于像素的分类,每个分类器两个,一个二元分类仅识别滑坡和非滑坡。一种分类包含5个光谱波段(5B),另一种分类包含6个光谱波段(6B),并包含从DEM得到的坡度。利用Kappa指数和F1评分对结果进行验证。在本文使用的验证指标中,SVM 6B分类效果最好。确定滑坡面积为39.9325万平方米。结果有助于使用基于像素的分类器在热带环境中进行滑坡制图。然而,尽管SVM分类是成功的,但算法只捕获了面积较大的滑坡,这证实了使用更精细的空间分辨率图像进行进一步分析的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Landslide recognition using SVM, Random Forest, and Maximum Likelihood classifiers on high-resolution satellite images: A case study of Itaóca, southeastern Brazil
Landslide identification is important for understanding their conditioning factors, and for constructing susceptibility, risk, and vulnerability maps. In remote sensing this can be accomplished manually or through classifiers. This study compares three image classifiers (Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) used in identifying landslides in Itaóca (São Paulo, Brazil). Two datasets were used: a RapidEye-5 (5 m) image and a Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) (12.5 m). Seven pixel-based classifications were produced, two for each classifier and a binary class that identified only landslides and non-landslides. One classification contained five spectral bands (5B), while the other contained six bands (6B) and included the slope derived from the DEM. The results were validated using Kappa index and F1 score. The SVM 6B classification achieved the best results among the validation indices used herein. It identified a landslide area of 399,325 m². The results contribute to landslide mapping in tropical environments using pixel-based classifiers. However, although the SVM classification was successful, only landslides with larger areas were captured by the algorithms, con-firming the importance of conducting further analyses using images with finer spatial resolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Geology
Brazilian Journal of Geology GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
12
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Geology (BJG) is a quarterly journal published by the Brazilian Geological Society with an electronic open access version that provides an in-ternacional medium for the publication of original scientific work of broad interest concerned with all aspects of the earth sciences in Brazil, South America, and Antarctica, in-cluding oceanic regions adjacent to these regions. The BJG publishes papers with a regional appeal and more than local significance in the fields of mineralogy, petrology, geochemistry, paleontology, sedimentology, stratigraphy, structural geology, tectonics, neotectonics, geophysics applied to geology, volcanology, metallogeny and mineral deposits, marine geology, glaciology, paleoclimatology, geochronology, biostratigraphy, engineering geology, hydrogeology, geological hazards and remote sensing, providing a niche for interdisciplinary work on regional geology and Earth history. The BJG publishes articles (including review articles), rapid communications, articles with accelerated review processes, editorials, and discussions (brief, objective and concise comments on recent papers published in BJG with replies by authors). Manuscripts must be written in English. Companion papers will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信