临床检查与磁共振成像(MRI)诊断印尼人群前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂的准确性比较

Luthfi Hidayat, A. F. R. Triangga, Muhamad Afrizal Farkhan, B. F. P. Rahayu, R. Magetsari
{"title":"临床检查与磁共振成像(MRI)诊断印尼人群前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂的准确性比较","authors":"Luthfi Hidayat, A. F. R. Triangga, Muhamad Afrizal Farkhan, B. F. P. Rahayu, R. Magetsari","doi":"10.19106/jmedsci005302202107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most common knee ligament injured. Anterior drawer and Lachman tests are the most common physical examinations for helping diagnose ACL injuries, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the first choice of supporting examination for evaluating any internal abnormality of the knee. However, studies concerning the accuracy of those examinations in the Indonesian population are limited. This study aimed to compare the accuracy between the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and MRI in diagnosing ACL injury in Javanese patients. This retrospective study used medical records data of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta in 2018. The MRI and the clinical examination results were compared to the arthroscopy results as the gold standard. The study showed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for the anterior drawer test were 86.67% (95%CI: 69.28-96.24%), 80% (CI: 44.39-97.48%), 92.86% (CI: 78.88-97.84), 66.67% (CI: 43.28-83.98%), and 85% (CI: 70.16-94.29%), respectively. Lachman test had 96.67% (CI: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity, 90% (CI: 55.50-99.75%) specificity, 96.67% (CI: 81.86-99.47%) PPV, 90% (CI: 56.44-98.43%) NPV, and 95% (CI: 83.08-99.39%) accuracy. The diagnostic parameters of MRI were 83.33% (CI: 65.28-94.36%) for sensitivity, 60% (CI: 26.24-87.84%) for specificity, 86.21% (CI: 74.21-93.14%) for PPV, 54.55% (CI: 31.77-75.57%) for NPV, and 77.50% (CI: 61.55-89.16%) for accuracy. In conclusion, the Lachman test has better accuracy than the anterior drawer test. Both the anterior drawer and Lachman tests had higher accuracy compared to the MRI.","PeriodicalId":17474,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thee Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on Indonesian population\",\"authors\":\"Luthfi Hidayat, A. F. R. Triangga, Muhamad Afrizal Farkhan, B. F. P. Rahayu, R. Magetsari\",\"doi\":\"10.19106/jmedsci005302202107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most common knee ligament injured. Anterior drawer and Lachman tests are the most common physical examinations for helping diagnose ACL injuries, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the first choice of supporting examination for evaluating any internal abnormality of the knee. However, studies concerning the accuracy of those examinations in the Indonesian population are limited. This study aimed to compare the accuracy between the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and MRI in diagnosing ACL injury in Javanese patients. This retrospective study used medical records data of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta in 2018. The MRI and the clinical examination results were compared to the arthroscopy results as the gold standard. The study showed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for the anterior drawer test were 86.67% (95%CI: 69.28-96.24%), 80% (CI: 44.39-97.48%), 92.86% (CI: 78.88-97.84), 66.67% (CI: 43.28-83.98%), and 85% (CI: 70.16-94.29%), respectively. Lachman test had 96.67% (CI: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity, 90% (CI: 55.50-99.75%) specificity, 96.67% (CI: 81.86-99.47%) PPV, 90% (CI: 56.44-98.43%) NPV, and 95% (CI: 83.08-99.39%) accuracy. The diagnostic parameters of MRI were 83.33% (CI: 65.28-94.36%) for sensitivity, 60% (CI: 26.24-87.84%) for specificity, 86.21% (CI: 74.21-93.14%) for PPV, 54.55% (CI: 31.77-75.57%) for NPV, and 77.50% (CI: 61.55-89.16%) for accuracy. In conclusion, the Lachman test has better accuracy than the anterior drawer test. Both the anterior drawer and Lachman tests had higher accuracy compared to the MRI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thee Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thee Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19106/jmedsci005302202107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thee Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19106/jmedsci005302202107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是膝关节最常见的韧带损伤。前抽屉试验和拉赫曼试验是帮助诊断前交叉韧带损伤最常用的体格检查,而磁共振成像(MRI)是评估任何膝关节内部异常的首选辅助检查。但是,关于这些检查在印度尼西亚人口中的准确性的研究是有限的。本研究旨在比较爪哇患者前抽屉试验、拉赫曼试验和MRI诊断前交叉韧带损伤的准确性。这项回顾性研究使用了2018年在日惹Sardjito综合医院骨科和创伤科接受膝关节镜检查的患者的医疗记录数据。将MRI和临床检查结果与关节镜检查结果作为金标准进行比较。研究显示,前抽屉试验的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性分别为86.67% (95%CI: 69.28 ~ 96.24%)、80% (CI: 44.39 ~ 97.48%)、92.86% (CI: 78.88 ~ 97.84)、66.67% (CI: 43.28 ~ 83.98%)和85% (CI: 70.16 ~ 94.29%)。Lachman试验灵敏度96.67% (CI: 82.78 ~ 99.92%),特异性90% (CI: 55.50 ~ 99.75%), PPV 96.67% (CI: 81.86 ~ 99.47%), NPV 90% (CI: 56.44 ~ 98.43%),准确率95% (CI: 83.8 ~ 99.39%)。MRI诊断参数敏感性为83.33% (CI: 65.28 ~ 94.36%),特异性为60% (CI: 26.24 ~ 87.84%), PPV为86.21% (CI: 74.21 ~ 93.14%), NPV为54.55% (CI: 31.77 ~ 75.57%),准确性为77.50% (CI: 61.55 ~ 89.16%)。综上所述,Lachman试验比前抽屉试验具有更好的准确性。与MRI相比,前抽屉和拉赫曼测试都具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on Indonesian population
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most common knee ligament injured. Anterior drawer and Lachman tests are the most common physical examinations for helping diagnose ACL injuries, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the first choice of supporting examination for evaluating any internal abnormality of the knee. However, studies concerning the accuracy of those examinations in the Indonesian population are limited. This study aimed to compare the accuracy between the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and MRI in diagnosing ACL injury in Javanese patients. This retrospective study used medical records data of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta in 2018. The MRI and the clinical examination results were compared to the arthroscopy results as the gold standard. The study showed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for the anterior drawer test were 86.67% (95%CI: 69.28-96.24%), 80% (CI: 44.39-97.48%), 92.86% (CI: 78.88-97.84), 66.67% (CI: 43.28-83.98%), and 85% (CI: 70.16-94.29%), respectively. Lachman test had 96.67% (CI: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity, 90% (CI: 55.50-99.75%) specificity, 96.67% (CI: 81.86-99.47%) PPV, 90% (CI: 56.44-98.43%) NPV, and 95% (CI: 83.08-99.39%) accuracy. The diagnostic parameters of MRI were 83.33% (CI: 65.28-94.36%) for sensitivity, 60% (CI: 26.24-87.84%) for specificity, 86.21% (CI: 74.21-93.14%) for PPV, 54.55% (CI: 31.77-75.57%) for NPV, and 77.50% (CI: 61.55-89.16%) for accuracy. In conclusion, the Lachman test has better accuracy than the anterior drawer test. Both the anterior drawer and Lachman tests had higher accuracy compared to the MRI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信