圣托马斯液与改良柯林斯液长期保存猪心脏的比较

Chang-Zhi Chen MD, PhD , Ke-Jie Cao MD , Da-Wen Li MD , Xiao-Ming Sun RN , Hai-Fen Pan MD , Jin Fen MD , Ze-Min Li MD , Yi-Shan Wang MD
{"title":"圣托马斯液与改良柯林斯液长期保存猪心脏的比较","authors":"Chang-Zhi Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ke-Jie Cao MD ,&nbsp;Da-Wen Li MD ,&nbsp;Xiao-Ming Sun RN ,&nbsp;Hai-Fen Pan MD ,&nbsp;Jin Fen MD ,&nbsp;Ze-Min Li MD ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Wang MD","doi":"10.1016/1324-2881(95)90005-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comparison between St Thomas No. 1 solution (group 1) and modified Collins solution (group 2) in porcine heart preservation for 5 hours was studied. After a single flush, hearts were stored at 4°C and resuscitated by a heart-lung machine primed with diluted blood. At the end of preservation, hearts in group 1 increased in weight by 8.8±1 .4%. However, weights in group 2 decreased by 1.5 ±0.9%. After reperfusion, group 1 and group 2 gained weight by 15.3 ±1.5% and 18.5±1.6% respectively. Myocardial oxygen consumption in group 1 was higher at 15 min and 60 min of reperfusion. Coronary arterial resistance index was higher in group 2 at 1 min and 15 min of reperfusion. Cardiac maximal stroke work index in group 1 was superior to group 2. After reperfusion, the mitochondria in group 1 demonstrated recovery, and myocytes were intact. In contrast, myocardial contraction bands and myocytolysis were observed in group 2, as well as broken mitochondrial membranes and calcium deposition in mitochondria. St Thomas No. 1 solution was better than modified Collins solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101219,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1324-2881(95)90005-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of St Thomas solution and modified Collins solution in long-term porcine heart preservation\",\"authors\":\"Chang-Zhi Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ke-Jie Cao MD ,&nbsp;Da-Wen Li MD ,&nbsp;Xiao-Ming Sun RN ,&nbsp;Hai-Fen Pan MD ,&nbsp;Jin Fen MD ,&nbsp;Ze-Min Li MD ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Wang MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/1324-2881(95)90005-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A comparison between St Thomas No. 1 solution (group 1) and modified Collins solution (group 2) in porcine heart preservation for 5 hours was studied. After a single flush, hearts were stored at 4°C and resuscitated by a heart-lung machine primed with diluted blood. At the end of preservation, hearts in group 1 increased in weight by 8.8±1 .4%. However, weights in group 2 decreased by 1.5 ±0.9%. After reperfusion, group 1 and group 2 gained weight by 15.3 ±1.5% and 18.5±1.6% respectively. Myocardial oxygen consumption in group 1 was higher at 15 min and 60 min of reperfusion. Coronary arterial resistance index was higher in group 2 at 1 min and 15 min of reperfusion. Cardiac maximal stroke work index in group 1 was superior to group 2. After reperfusion, the mitochondria in group 1 demonstrated recovery, and myocytes were intact. In contrast, myocardial contraction bands and myocytolysis were observed in group 2, as well as broken mitochondrial membranes and calcium deposition in mitochondria. St Thomas No. 1 solution was better than modified Collins solution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 27-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1324-2881(95)90005-5\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/1324288195900055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/1324288195900055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较St Thomas 1号液(1组)和改良Collins液(2组)在猪心脏保存5h的效果。在一次冲洗后,心脏被储存在4°C,并由一个装有稀释血液的心肺机复苏。保存结束时,1组心脏重量增加8.8±1.4%。2组体重下降1.5±0.9%。再灌注后,1组和2组体重分别增加15.3±1.5%和18.5±1.6%。1组心肌耗氧量在再灌注15 min和60 min时较高。2组在再灌注1 min和15 min时冠状动脉阻力指数较高。1组心脏最大搏功指数优于2组。再灌注后,1组线粒体恢复,肌细胞完整。2组大鼠心肌收缩带、肌细胞溶解,线粒体膜破裂,线粒体内钙沉积。圣托马斯1号溶液优于改良柯林斯溶液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of St Thomas solution and modified Collins solution in long-term porcine heart preservation

A comparison between St Thomas No. 1 solution (group 1) and modified Collins solution (group 2) in porcine heart preservation for 5 hours was studied. After a single flush, hearts were stored at 4°C and resuscitated by a heart-lung machine primed with diluted blood. At the end of preservation, hearts in group 1 increased in weight by 8.8±1 .4%. However, weights in group 2 decreased by 1.5 ±0.9%. After reperfusion, group 1 and group 2 gained weight by 15.3 ±1.5% and 18.5±1.6% respectively. Myocardial oxygen consumption in group 1 was higher at 15 min and 60 min of reperfusion. Coronary arterial resistance index was higher in group 2 at 1 min and 15 min of reperfusion. Cardiac maximal stroke work index in group 1 was superior to group 2. After reperfusion, the mitochondria in group 1 demonstrated recovery, and myocytes were intact. In contrast, myocardial contraction bands and myocytolysis were observed in group 2, as well as broken mitochondrial membranes and calcium deposition in mitochondria. St Thomas No. 1 solution was better than modified Collins solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信