波浪能转换器控制策略的比较

Ryan G. Coe , Giorgio Bacelli , David G. Wilson , Ossama Abdelkhalik , Umesh A. Korde , Rush D. Robinett III
{"title":"波浪能转换器控制策略的比较","authors":"Ryan G. Coe ,&nbsp;Giorgio Bacelli ,&nbsp;David G. Wilson ,&nbsp;Ossama Abdelkhalik ,&nbsp;Umesh A. Korde ,&nbsp;Rush D. Robinett III","doi":"10.1016/j.ijome.2017.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we employ a numerical model to compare the performance of a number of wave energy converter control strategies. The controllers selected for evaluation span a wide range in their requirements for implementation. Each control strategy is evaluated using a single numerical model with a set of sea states to represent a deployment site off the coast of Newport, OR. A number of metrics, ranging from power absorption to kinematics, are employed to provide a comparison of each control strategy’s performance that accounts for both relative benefits and costs. The results show a wide range of performances from the different controllers and highlight the need for a holistic design approach which considers control design as a parallel component within the larger process WEC design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100705,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Marine Energy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 45-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijome.2017.11.001","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of control strategies for wave energy converters\",\"authors\":\"Ryan G. Coe ,&nbsp;Giorgio Bacelli ,&nbsp;David G. Wilson ,&nbsp;Ossama Abdelkhalik ,&nbsp;Umesh A. Korde ,&nbsp;Rush D. Robinett III\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijome.2017.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we employ a numerical model to compare the performance of a number of wave energy converter control strategies. The controllers selected for evaluation span a wide range in their requirements for implementation. Each control strategy is evaluated using a single numerical model with a set of sea states to represent a deployment site off the coast of Newport, OR. A number of metrics, ranging from power absorption to kinematics, are employed to provide a comparison of each control strategy’s performance that accounts for both relative benefits and costs. The results show a wide range of performances from the different controllers and highlight the need for a holistic design approach which considers control design as a parallel component within the larger process WEC design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Marine Energy\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 45-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijome.2017.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Marine Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214166917300905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Marine Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214166917300905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

在本研究中,我们采用数值模型来比较几种波能转换器控制策略的性能。选择用于评估的控制器在其实现要求方面跨越了广泛的范围。每个控制策略都使用一个单一的数值模型进行评估,该模型具有一组海况,代表纽波特海岸附近的部署地点。从功率吸收到运动学,采用了许多指标来对每种控制策略的性能进行比较,以说明相对收益和成本。结果显示了不同控制器的广泛性能,并强调了整体设计方法的必要性,该方法将控制设计视为大型过程WEC设计中的并行组件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of control strategies for wave energy converters

In this study, we employ a numerical model to compare the performance of a number of wave energy converter control strategies. The controllers selected for evaluation span a wide range in their requirements for implementation. Each control strategy is evaluated using a single numerical model with a set of sea states to represent a deployment site off the coast of Newport, OR. A number of metrics, ranging from power absorption to kinematics, are employed to provide a comparison of each control strategy’s performance that accounts for both relative benefits and costs. The results show a wide range of performances from the different controllers and highlight the need for a holistic design approach which considers control design as a parallel component within the larger process WEC design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信