减少语法与语法错误:以非母语英语教师专业学习为例

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
G. A. Lokita, Purnamika Utami, I. Gusti, Ngurah Agung, Wijaya Mahardika
{"title":"减少语法与语法错误:以非母语英语教师专业学习为例","authors":"G. A. Lokita, Purnamika Utami, I. Gusti, Ngurah Agung, Wijaya Mahardika","doi":"10.26858/ijole.v7i2.46431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grammar has long been a source of aggravation for anyone learning a second language, not just English language learners, but also non-native English teachers. People can now employ Grammarly to correct their grammar mistakes, owing to the sophistication of modern technology. The debate over whether teachers use Grammarly as part of their professional development is ongoing. The purpose of this study was to identify the grammatical errors made by non-native English teachers when writing narrative texts before and after Grammarly checked them. The participants in this qualitative study were 24 English teachers from the English Teacher Association of Buleleng Regency in Bali, Indonesia. This study employed the surface approach taxonomy to analyze the grammatical errors and interviewed the teachers to elicit factors that contribute to grammatical errors. This study found that the most common type of misformation error, specifically the alternating form error, was found in both Grammarly-corrected and Grammarly-uncorrected texts. Furthermore, intralingual factors were responsible for the majority of errors. The integration of Grammarly into teachers' professional learning is discussed.","PeriodicalId":40801,"journal":{"name":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grammarly and Grammatical Errors Reduction: A Case for Non-Native English Teachers’ Professional Learning\",\"authors\":\"G. A. Lokita, Purnamika Utami, I. Gusti, Ngurah Agung, Wijaya Mahardika\",\"doi\":\"10.26858/ijole.v7i2.46431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grammar has long been a source of aggravation for anyone learning a second language, not just English language learners, but also non-native English teachers. People can now employ Grammarly to correct their grammar mistakes, owing to the sophistication of modern technology. The debate over whether teachers use Grammarly as part of their professional development is ongoing. The purpose of this study was to identify the grammatical errors made by non-native English teachers when writing narrative texts before and after Grammarly checked them. The participants in this qualitative study were 24 English teachers from the English Teacher Association of Buleleng Regency in Bali, Indonesia. This study employed the surface approach taxonomy to analyze the grammatical errors and interviewed the teachers to elicit factors that contribute to grammatical errors. This study found that the most common type of misformation error, specifically the alternating form error, was found in both Grammarly-corrected and Grammarly-uncorrected texts. Furthermore, intralingual factors were responsible for the majority of errors. The integration of Grammarly into teachers' professional learning is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.46431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.46431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,语法一直是任何学习第二语言的人的烦恼之源,不仅是英语学习者,也包括非英语母语的教师。由于现代科技的成熟,人们现在可以使用Grammarly来纠正语法错误。关于教师是否将语法作为其专业发展的一部分的争论正在进行中。本研究的目的是在Grammarly检查前后找出非母语英语教师在写作叙事文本时所犯的语法错误。本质性研究的参与者为24名来自印尼巴厘岛Buleleng Regency英语教师协会的英语教师。本研究采用表面法分类法对语法错误进行分析,并对教师进行访谈,找出导致语法错误的因素。这项研究发现,最常见的错误类型,特别是交替形式错误,在语法纠正和语法未纠正的文本中都有发现。此外,语内因素是造成大多数错误的原因。探讨了语法融入教师专业学习的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grammarly and Grammatical Errors Reduction: A Case for Non-Native English Teachers’ Professional Learning
Grammar has long been a source of aggravation for anyone learning a second language, not just English language learners, but also non-native English teachers. People can now employ Grammarly to correct their grammar mistakes, owing to the sophistication of modern technology. The debate over whether teachers use Grammarly as part of their professional development is ongoing. The purpose of this study was to identify the grammatical errors made by non-native English teachers when writing narrative texts before and after Grammarly checked them. The participants in this qualitative study were 24 English teachers from the English Teacher Association of Buleleng Regency in Bali, Indonesia. This study employed the surface approach taxonomy to analyze the grammatical errors and interviewed the teachers to elicit factors that contribute to grammatical errors. This study found that the most common type of misformation error, specifically the alternating form error, was found in both Grammarly-corrected and Grammarly-uncorrected texts. Furthermore, intralingual factors were responsible for the majority of errors. The integration of Grammarly into teachers' professional learning is discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信