Qotrun Nada Annuri
{"title":"HUḌŪRI (INNATE IDEA) SEBAGAI BASIS PENGETAHUAN","authors":"Qotrun Nada Annuri","doi":"10.20871/kpjipm.v7i2.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empiricism is a philosophical school that focuses knowledge only on the senses. One of the characters is John Locke. In Locke's view, he emphasized that knowledge comes from observations we make of our own surroundings with a tool called John Locke sensing, which he considers this as a white sheet of paper (tabularasa) and rejects innate ideas. Locke views reason as a passive shelter receiving the results of the senses. Locke considered what he called knowledge to be a composite of ideas derived from sensory experience. Locke generalizes to knowledge. The research aims to answer the problems that arise from Locke's view by criticizing the theory of tabularasa based on huduri science by using huduri according to Tabataba'i. as for this research using qualitative methods and literature. As for analyzing the data using a theory demonstration criticism approach. From the research that has been done by the author, it shows that huduri science is the capital for every knowledge, even for knowledge that is preceded by the senses. Because in essence knowledge is something immaterial, as for what enters the subject who knows is something immaterial too, even though the object is bound by matter. This is what is called the presence of something immaterial in the immaterial soul.","PeriodicalId":31008,"journal":{"name":"Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v7i2.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经验主义是一种只把知识集中在感官上的哲学流派。其中一个角色是约翰·洛克。在洛克看来,他强调知识来自于我们用一种叫做约翰·洛克感知的工具对周围环境的观察,他认为这是一张白纸(tabularasa),拒绝固有的想法。洛克认为理性是一个被动的庇护所,接受感官的结果。洛克认为他所谓的知识是源自感官经验的观念的综合体。洛克将其概括为知识。本研究旨在通过使用《Tabataba’i》的《huduri》来批判基于huduri科学的tabularasa理论,从而回答洛克观点所产生的问题。对于本研究采用定性方法和文献资料。在数据分析方面,采用理论论证批评的方法。从笔者所做的研究来看,huduri科学是每一种知识的资本,即使是先于感官的知识也是如此。因为在本质上,知识是一种非物质的东西,至于进入认知主体的东西也是一种非物质的东西,尽管客体是受物质束缚的。这就是所谓的非物质的存在于非物质的灵魂中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HUḌŪRI (INNATE IDEA) SEBAGAI BASIS PENGETAHUAN
Empiricism is a philosophical school that focuses knowledge only on the senses. One of the characters is John Locke. In Locke's view, he emphasized that knowledge comes from observations we make of our own surroundings with a tool called John Locke sensing, which he considers this as a white sheet of paper (tabularasa) and rejects innate ideas. Locke views reason as a passive shelter receiving the results of the senses. Locke considered what he called knowledge to be a composite of ideas derived from sensory experience. Locke generalizes to knowledge. The research aims to answer the problems that arise from Locke's view by criticizing the theory of tabularasa based on huduri science by using huduri according to Tabataba'i. as for this research using qualitative methods and literature. As for analyzing the data using a theory demonstration criticism approach. From the research that has been done by the author, it shows that huduri science is the capital for every knowledge, even for knowledge that is preceded by the senses. Because in essence knowledge is something immaterial, as for what enters the subject who knows is something immaterial too, even though the object is bound by matter. This is what is called the presence of something immaterial in the immaterial soul.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信