正常与异常(含冠状病毒)肺图像分类方法的定量与定性比较研究

Halaa Kadhim hasan, Ayad A.AL-Ani, Noor Z. AlKhazraji
{"title":"正常与异常(含冠状病毒)肺图像分类方法的定量与定性比较研究","authors":"Halaa Kadhim hasan, Ayad A.AL-Ani, Noor Z. AlKhazraji","doi":"10.29350/qjps.2021.26.3.1438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification is concerned with establishing criteria that can be used to identify or distinguish different populations of objects that appear in images. In this paper Supervised and unsupervised classification method applied on normal, abnormal (with a coronavirus) ct- lung images (which it took from Al shaikh zaeid Hospital)  to study the quantitative and qualitative properties of these two categories. The analysis of performance with default quantitative parameters revealed that (kurtosis, skewness, entropy, Stander deviation (STD), mean). We found that: Qualitative (as seen) of   abnormal lung images after applying  Supervisors classification are better than the qualitative of abnormal lung images after applying  unsupervisors classification to detect the virus with white color in the lower lobes of the lung.. from The quantitative Properties such as (kurtosis, skewness) of original lung images are similar in rising to resulted value after applying  Supervisors classification on it, so Supervisors method is better than unSupervisors method to distinguishing between normal and abnormal lung images.","PeriodicalId":7856,"journal":{"name":"Al-Qadisiyah Journal Of Pure Science","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison Study between Classification Methods on normal and abnormal (with a coronavirus ) lung images\",\"authors\":\"Halaa Kadhim hasan, Ayad A.AL-Ani, Noor Z. AlKhazraji\",\"doi\":\"10.29350/qjps.2021.26.3.1438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classification is concerned with establishing criteria that can be used to identify or distinguish different populations of objects that appear in images. In this paper Supervised and unsupervised classification method applied on normal, abnormal (with a coronavirus) ct- lung images (which it took from Al shaikh zaeid Hospital)  to study the quantitative and qualitative properties of these two categories. The analysis of performance with default quantitative parameters revealed that (kurtosis, skewness, entropy, Stander deviation (STD), mean). We found that: Qualitative (as seen) of   abnormal lung images after applying  Supervisors classification are better than the qualitative of abnormal lung images after applying  unsupervisors classification to detect the virus with white color in the lower lobes of the lung.. from The quantitative Properties such as (kurtosis, skewness) of original lung images are similar in rising to resulted value after applying  Supervisors classification on it, so Supervisors method is better than unSupervisors method to distinguishing between normal and abnormal lung images.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Qadisiyah Journal Of Pure Science\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Qadisiyah Journal Of Pure Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29350/qjps.2021.26.3.1438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Qadisiyah Journal Of Pure Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29350/qjps.2021.26.3.1438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分类涉及建立可用于识别或区分图像中出现的不同对象群的标准。本文采用监督和非监督分类方法对正常、异常(含冠状病毒)ct-肺图像(取自Al sheikh zaeid医院)进行定量和定性研究。使用默认的定量参数对性能进行分析,结果显示(峰度、偏度、熵、标准偏差(STD)、平均值)。我们发现:在检测肺下叶白色病毒时,应用supervisor分类后的肺异常图像的定性(如图所示)优于应用unsupervisor分类后的肺异常图像的定性。对原始肺图像进行supervisor分类后,其(峰度、偏度)等定量属性在上升结果值上是相似的,因此supervisor方法在区分正常与异常肺图像上优于unSupervisors方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison Study between Classification Methods on normal and abnormal (with a coronavirus ) lung images
Classification is concerned with establishing criteria that can be used to identify or distinguish different populations of objects that appear in images. In this paper Supervised and unsupervised classification method applied on normal, abnormal (with a coronavirus) ct- lung images (which it took from Al shaikh zaeid Hospital)  to study the quantitative and qualitative properties of these two categories. The analysis of performance with default quantitative parameters revealed that (kurtosis, skewness, entropy, Stander deviation (STD), mean). We found that: Qualitative (as seen) of   abnormal lung images after applying  Supervisors classification are better than the qualitative of abnormal lung images after applying  unsupervisors classification to detect the virus with white color in the lower lobes of the lung.. from The quantitative Properties such as (kurtosis, skewness) of original lung images are similar in rising to resulted value after applying  Supervisors classification on it, so Supervisors method is better than unSupervisors method to distinguishing between normal and abnormal lung images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信