{"title":"SFMA、MoMA与湾区建筑编纂(1935-1953)","authors":"José Parra-Martínez, J. Crosse","doi":"10.4995/vlc.2019.10939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the under-recognized implications of SFMA’s early architectural exhibition program. Conceived under founding director Grace Morley, a series of pioneering events first presented Bay Area architects’ work as interdependent with the region’s rich geographical and cultural context, offering new lens through which Eastern critics prompted to re-evaluate California modernism. Among these shows, the 1949 landmark exhibition Domestic Architecture of the San Francisco Bay Region would epitomize the postwar discussions upon the autonomy of American modern architecture. Correspondingly, by exploring SFMA-MoMA exchanges during Elizabeth Mock’s curatorship, this essay aims to examine the conflict of perceptions and intentions between the country’s two Coasts that brought about the 1949 show as part of a well-orchestrated campaign that had begun years before Lewis Mumford’s 1947 New Yorker piece triggered a controversy over the existence of a “Bay Region Style.” Contrary to prevailing assumptions that this exhibition was a delayed reaction to the 1948 MoMA symposium organized by Philip Johnson to refute Mumford’s arguments, it was the consequence of an effective regionalist agenda whose success was, precisely, that many influential actors in the United States were exposed, indoctrinated and/or seduced by the so-called Bay Region School’s emphasis on social, political and ecological concerns.","PeriodicalId":40566,"journal":{"name":"VLC Arquitectura-Research Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SFMA, MoMA and the Codification of Bay Region Architecture (1935-1953)\",\"authors\":\"José Parra-Martínez, J. Crosse\",\"doi\":\"10.4995/vlc.2019.10939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the under-recognized implications of SFMA’s early architectural exhibition program. Conceived under founding director Grace Morley, a series of pioneering events first presented Bay Area architects’ work as interdependent with the region’s rich geographical and cultural context, offering new lens through which Eastern critics prompted to re-evaluate California modernism. Among these shows, the 1949 landmark exhibition Domestic Architecture of the San Francisco Bay Region would epitomize the postwar discussions upon the autonomy of American modern architecture. Correspondingly, by exploring SFMA-MoMA exchanges during Elizabeth Mock’s curatorship, this essay aims to examine the conflict of perceptions and intentions between the country’s two Coasts that brought about the 1949 show as part of a well-orchestrated campaign that had begun years before Lewis Mumford’s 1947 New Yorker piece triggered a controversy over the existence of a “Bay Region Style.” Contrary to prevailing assumptions that this exhibition was a delayed reaction to the 1948 MoMA symposium organized by Philip Johnson to refute Mumford’s arguments, it was the consequence of an effective regionalist agenda whose success was, precisely, that many influential actors in the United States were exposed, indoctrinated and/or seduced by the so-called Bay Region School’s emphasis on social, political and ecological concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VLC Arquitectura-Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VLC Arquitectura-Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2019.10939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VLC Arquitectura-Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2019.10939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文探讨了SFMA早期建筑展览项目未被充分认识的影响。在创始董事Grace Morley的构想下,一系列开创性的活动首次将湾区建筑师的作品与该地区丰富的地理和文化背景相互依存,提供了新的视角,通过东方评论家促使重新评估加州现代主义。在这些展览中,1949年具有里程碑意义的“旧金山湾区国内建筑”展览是战后关于美国现代建筑自主性的讨论的缩影。相应地,通过探索伊丽莎白·莫克策展期间SFMA-MoMA之间的交流,本文旨在研究这个国家两个海岸之间的观念和意图的冲突,这种冲突导致了1949年的展览,作为刘易斯·芒福德1947年在《纽约客》上发表的一篇文章引发了关于“湾区风格”存在的争议之前几年开始的精心策划的运动的一部分。人们普遍认为,这次展览是对1948年菲利普·约翰逊(Philip Johnson)为反驳芒福德的论点而组织的MoMA研讨会的延迟反应,与此相反,它是一个有效的地区主义议程的结果,其成功恰恰在于,美国许多有影响力的行动者都被所谓的湾区学派(Bay Region School)对社会、政治和生态问题的重视所暴露、灌输和/或引诱。
SFMA, MoMA and the Codification of Bay Region Architecture (1935-1953)
This paper addresses the under-recognized implications of SFMA’s early architectural exhibition program. Conceived under founding director Grace Morley, a series of pioneering events first presented Bay Area architects’ work as interdependent with the region’s rich geographical and cultural context, offering new lens through which Eastern critics prompted to re-evaluate California modernism. Among these shows, the 1949 landmark exhibition Domestic Architecture of the San Francisco Bay Region would epitomize the postwar discussions upon the autonomy of American modern architecture. Correspondingly, by exploring SFMA-MoMA exchanges during Elizabeth Mock’s curatorship, this essay aims to examine the conflict of perceptions and intentions between the country’s two Coasts that brought about the 1949 show as part of a well-orchestrated campaign that had begun years before Lewis Mumford’s 1947 New Yorker piece triggered a controversy over the existence of a “Bay Region Style.” Contrary to prevailing assumptions that this exhibition was a delayed reaction to the 1948 MoMA symposium organized by Philip Johnson to refute Mumford’s arguments, it was the consequence of an effective regionalist agenda whose success was, precisely, that many influential actors in the United States were exposed, indoctrinated and/or seduced by the so-called Bay Region School’s emphasis on social, political and ecological concerns.