对比土耳其-埃及和盎格鲁-埃及的征服对苏丹有利吗?

A. Al‐Shahi
{"title":"对比土耳其-埃及和盎格鲁-埃及的征服对苏丹有利吗?","authors":"A. Al‐Shahi","doi":"10.1353/tmr.2022.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The central theme of this paper is to discuss and contrast two periods of Sudan’s experiences with two conquests; the Turco-Egyptian (1820/1–1885); and the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium (1898–1956). My abstractions from these two periods show that the first experience was one characterized by exploitation, harsh governance and lack of development. Furthermore, it shows that Egypt was acting from self-interest rather than for the welfare of the Sudanese.In contrast, the second experience was one of development of the entire infrastructure of Sudan. Some of these developments were funded by British tax payers. Sudanese benefited from the newly-created infrastructure despite their critique of the British as an occupying or colonial power, although technically Sudan was not a colony. This paper will chart and assess the introduction of changes that were introduced in Sudan by both conquering powers.","PeriodicalId":85753,"journal":{"name":"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib","volume":"36 1","pages":"430 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Were the Contrasting Turco-Egyptian and the Anglo-Egyptian Conquests Beneficial to the Sudanese?\",\"authors\":\"A. Al‐Shahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tmr.2022.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The central theme of this paper is to discuss and contrast two periods of Sudan’s experiences with two conquests; the Turco-Egyptian (1820/1–1885); and the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium (1898–1956). My abstractions from these two periods show that the first experience was one characterized by exploitation, harsh governance and lack of development. Furthermore, it shows that Egypt was acting from self-interest rather than for the welfare of the Sudanese.In contrast, the second experience was one of development of the entire infrastructure of Sudan. Some of these developments were funded by British tax payers. Sudanese benefited from the newly-created infrastructure despite their critique of the British as an occupying or colonial power, although technically Sudan was not a colony. This paper will chart and assess the introduction of changes that were introduced in Sudan by both conquering powers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"430 - 440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tmr.2022.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tmr.2022.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文的中心主题是讨论和对比两个时期的苏丹经历和两次征服;土耳其-埃及人(1820/1-1885);以及盎格鲁-埃及共管公寓(1898-1956)。我对这两个时期的抽象分析表明,第一个时期的特点是剥削、严厉的治理和缺乏发展。此外,这表明埃及的行动是出于自身利益,而不是为了苏丹的福利。相比之下,第二个经验是苏丹整个基础设施的发展。其中一些开发项目是由英国纳税人资助的。苏丹人从新建的基础设施中受益,尽管他们批评英国是占领者或殖民大国,尽管严格来说苏丹不是殖民地。本文将绘制图表并评估两个征服国在苏丹引入的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Were the Contrasting Turco-Egyptian and the Anglo-Egyptian Conquests Beneficial to the Sudanese?
Abstract:The central theme of this paper is to discuss and contrast two periods of Sudan’s experiences with two conquests; the Turco-Egyptian (1820/1–1885); and the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium (1898–1956). My abstractions from these two periods show that the first experience was one characterized by exploitation, harsh governance and lack of development. Furthermore, it shows that Egypt was acting from self-interest rather than for the welfare of the Sudanese.In contrast, the second experience was one of development of the entire infrastructure of Sudan. Some of these developments were funded by British tax payers. Sudanese benefited from the newly-created infrastructure despite their critique of the British as an occupying or colonial power, although technically Sudan was not a colony. This paper will chart and assess the introduction of changes that were introduced in Sudan by both conquering powers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信