膝神经冷却射频消融术治疗慢性膝关节疼痛

Y. Eshraghi, R. Khan, O. Said, C. Velasco, M. Guirguis
{"title":"膝神经冷却射频消融术治疗慢性膝关节疼痛","authors":"Y. Eshraghi, R. Khan, O. Said, C. Velasco, M. Guirguis","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.27.20045674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic knee pain from conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant problem in a growing and aging population. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is an emerging technique to treat chronic knee pain. There is significant literature noting the clinical outcomes of CRFA in anatomic locations including the peripheral joints and the lumbar spine. This retrospective study found significant improvements in Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for patients with chronic knee pain who underwent cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) therapy of the genicular nerves. Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of CRFA in the general chronic knee pain population. Study Design: Retrospective electronic chart review. Setting: Outpatient non-profit practice. Methods: After institutional review board approval, we reviewed the data of 205 patients who had undergone cooled radiofrequency ablation therapy of the genicular nerves at a multiple-site pain practice between December 5, 2017 and September 4, 2019. The primary outcome was improvement in Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, assessed by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and opioid consumption, assessed by daily Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED). From the 205 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 104 patients who had PDI scores both before and after the CRFA procedure that were collected in the appropriate time frame. For these 104 patients, the pain scores and opioid consumption before and after the CRFA procedure were also collected. The age of the 104 patients ranged from 21 to 89 years. There were 38 males and 66 females. Results: The mean PDI score before genicular nerve block and CRFA was 38.7, and the mean PDI score after CRFA was 26.5. After CRFA treatment, 67.38% of patients had a decrease in their PDI scores, 27.9% had no change, and 4.81% had an increase in their PDI scores. P-value <0.001 with 95% CI Median (-11, -7). The mean NPRS score before genicular nerve block and CRFA was 6.98, and the mean NPRS score after CRFA was 4.18. P-value <0.001 with 95% CI Median (-3, -2). The largest group of patients, 49% of patients, had a pain score reduction of 2.25 points, while the next largest group, 17.3% of patients, had a reduction of 0.75 points, followed by 12.5% of patients with a reduction of 3.75 points. When comparing Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED) before and after the CRFA procedure, 37.5% of patients were not on opioid medication at any time during the study; additionally, the MED did not change for the majority of patients (80.77%), while the MED decreased for 13.46% of patients and increased for 5.77% of patients. Mean MED before GNB and CRFA was 17.13 and 15.91 after CRFA. P=0.025 with 95% CI Median (0,0). No serious adverse events were reported. Limitations: Retrospective nature of the study. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the clinical effectiveness of CRFA for the treatment of chronic knee pain by improvements in PDI scores and NPRS scores for the majority of patients. Results from this study indicate that CRFA treatment provides significant pain relief and reduces the disability caused by chronic knee pain.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"735 - 736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for treatment of chronic knee pain\",\"authors\":\"Y. Eshraghi, R. Khan, O. Said, C. Velasco, M. Guirguis\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2020.03.27.20045674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chronic knee pain from conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant problem in a growing and aging population. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is an emerging technique to treat chronic knee pain. There is significant literature noting the clinical outcomes of CRFA in anatomic locations including the peripheral joints and the lumbar spine. This retrospective study found significant improvements in Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for patients with chronic knee pain who underwent cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) therapy of the genicular nerves. Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of CRFA in the general chronic knee pain population. Study Design: Retrospective electronic chart review. Setting: Outpatient non-profit practice. Methods: After institutional review board approval, we reviewed the data of 205 patients who had undergone cooled radiofrequency ablation therapy of the genicular nerves at a multiple-site pain practice between December 5, 2017 and September 4, 2019. The primary outcome was improvement in Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, assessed by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and opioid consumption, assessed by daily Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED). From the 205 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 104 patients who had PDI scores both before and after the CRFA procedure that were collected in the appropriate time frame. For these 104 patients, the pain scores and opioid consumption before and after the CRFA procedure were also collected. The age of the 104 patients ranged from 21 to 89 years. There were 38 males and 66 females. Results: The mean PDI score before genicular nerve block and CRFA was 38.7, and the mean PDI score after CRFA was 26.5. After CRFA treatment, 67.38% of patients had a decrease in their PDI scores, 27.9% had no change, and 4.81% had an increase in their PDI scores. P-value <0.001 with 95% CI Median (-11, -7). The mean NPRS score before genicular nerve block and CRFA was 6.98, and the mean NPRS score after CRFA was 4.18. P-value <0.001 with 95% CI Median (-3, -2). The largest group of patients, 49% of patients, had a pain score reduction of 2.25 points, while the next largest group, 17.3% of patients, had a reduction of 0.75 points, followed by 12.5% of patients with a reduction of 3.75 points. When comparing Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED) before and after the CRFA procedure, 37.5% of patients were not on opioid medication at any time during the study; additionally, the MED did not change for the majority of patients (80.77%), while the MED decreased for 13.46% of patients and increased for 5.77% of patients. Mean MED before GNB and CRFA was 17.13 and 15.91 after CRFA. P=0.025 with 95% CI Median (0,0). No serious adverse events were reported. Limitations: Retrospective nature of the study. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the clinical effectiveness of CRFA for the treatment of chronic knee pain by improvements in PDI scores and NPRS scores for the majority of patients. Results from this study indicate that CRFA treatment provides significant pain relief and reduces the disability caused by chronic knee pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"735 - 736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20045674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20045674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:骨关节炎(OA)等疾病引起的慢性膝关节疼痛是人口增长和老龄化的一个重要问题。冷却射频消融术(CRFA)是一种治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的新兴技术。有重要的文献注意到CRFA在解剖位置的临床结果,包括外周关节和腰椎。这项回顾性研究发现,慢性膝关节疼痛患者接受膝神经冷却射频消融(CRFA)治疗后,疼痛残疾指数(PDI)评分和数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)评分有显著改善。目的:本回顾性研究评估CRFA在一般慢性膝关节疼痛人群中的有效性。研究设计:回顾性电子图表回顾。环境:门诊非营利性执业。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,我们回顾了2017年12月5日至2019年9月4日期间在多部位疼痛实践中接受膝神经冷却射频消融治疗的205例患者的数据。主要结局是疼痛残疾指数(PDI)评分的改善。次要结果是疼痛评分(通过数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)评估)和阿片类药物消耗(通过每日吗啡当量剂量(MED)评估)。在符合纳入标准的205例患者中,有104例患者在CRFA手术前后都有PDI评分,这些评分是在适当的时间范围内收集的。对于这104例患者,还收集了CRFA手术前后的疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗。104例患者年龄从21岁到89岁不等。男性38例,女性66例。结果:膝神经阻滞和CRFA前PDI平均评分为38.7,CRFA后PDI平均评分为26.5。经CRFA治疗后,67.38%患者PDI评分下降,27.9%患者PDI评分无变化,4.81%患者PDI评分升高。p值<0.001,95% CI中位数(-11,-7)。膝神经阻滞和CRFA前NPRS平均评分为6.98分,CRFA后NPRS平均评分为4.18分。p值<0.001,95% CI中位数(- 3,2)。最大的一组患者(49%)的疼痛评分降低了2.25分,而第二多的一组患者(17.3%)的疼痛评分降低了0.75分,其次是12.5%的患者,疼痛评分降低了3.75分。当比较CRFA手术前后吗啡等效剂量(MED)时,37.5%的患者在研究期间的任何时候都没有服用阿片类药物;此外,大多数患者的MED没有变化(80.77%),而MED下降了13.46%的患者,增加了5.77%的患者。GNB前和CRFA后的平均MED分别为17.13和15.91。P=0.025, 95% CI中位数(0,0)。无严重不良事件报告。局限性:本研究为回顾性研究。结论:本研究通过改善大多数患者的PDI评分和NPRS评分,证明了CRFA治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的临床有效性。本研究结果表明,CRFA治疗可显著缓解疼痛并减少慢性膝关节疼痛引起的残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for treatment of chronic knee pain
Background: Chronic knee pain from conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant problem in a growing and aging population. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is an emerging technique to treat chronic knee pain. There is significant literature noting the clinical outcomes of CRFA in anatomic locations including the peripheral joints and the lumbar spine. This retrospective study found significant improvements in Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for patients with chronic knee pain who underwent cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) therapy of the genicular nerves. Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of CRFA in the general chronic knee pain population. Study Design: Retrospective electronic chart review. Setting: Outpatient non-profit practice. Methods: After institutional review board approval, we reviewed the data of 205 patients who had undergone cooled radiofrequency ablation therapy of the genicular nerves at a multiple-site pain practice between December 5, 2017 and September 4, 2019. The primary outcome was improvement in Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, assessed by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and opioid consumption, assessed by daily Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED). From the 205 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 104 patients who had PDI scores both before and after the CRFA procedure that were collected in the appropriate time frame. For these 104 patients, the pain scores and opioid consumption before and after the CRFA procedure were also collected. The age of the 104 patients ranged from 21 to 89 years. There were 38 males and 66 females. Results: The mean PDI score before genicular nerve block and CRFA was 38.7, and the mean PDI score after CRFA was 26.5. After CRFA treatment, 67.38% of patients had a decrease in their PDI scores, 27.9% had no change, and 4.81% had an increase in their PDI scores. P-value <0.001 with 95% CI Median (-11, -7). The mean NPRS score before genicular nerve block and CRFA was 6.98, and the mean NPRS score after CRFA was 4.18. P-value <0.001 with 95% CI Median (-3, -2). The largest group of patients, 49% of patients, had a pain score reduction of 2.25 points, while the next largest group, 17.3% of patients, had a reduction of 0.75 points, followed by 12.5% of patients with a reduction of 3.75 points. When comparing Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED) before and after the CRFA procedure, 37.5% of patients were not on opioid medication at any time during the study; additionally, the MED did not change for the majority of patients (80.77%), while the MED decreased for 13.46% of patients and increased for 5.77% of patients. Mean MED before GNB and CRFA was 17.13 and 15.91 after CRFA. P=0.025 with 95% CI Median (0,0). No serious adverse events were reported. Limitations: Retrospective nature of the study. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the clinical effectiveness of CRFA for the treatment of chronic knee pain by improvements in PDI scores and NPRS scores for the majority of patients. Results from this study indicate that CRFA treatment provides significant pain relief and reduces the disability caused by chronic knee pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信