Changwoo Ryu, Sooil Shin, Yong-Bum Cho, Euiseong Kim, Minju Song
{"title":"根管显微手术各阶段失败病例分析:基于临床数据库的回顾性研究","authors":"Changwoo Ryu, Sooil Shin, Yong-Bum Cho, Euiseong Kim, Minju Song","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_164_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the most important stage of endodontic surgery by examining failed cases and analyzing the cause of failure during each stage of the procedure. Materials and Methods: We searched the clinical database of the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University, for patients with a history of endodontic microsurgery (EMS) performed between March 2017 and February 2021. Among the 428 patients who underwent EMS, those with a history of endodontic surgery were included. All surgical procedures were performed using a microscope, and the previously resected root surface or the root surface to be resected was inspected during surgery. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months and every year thereafter. Results: A total of 68 cases were included for analysis. The most common cause of failure was incomplete root-end filling (24 cases, 35.3%), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was used in 17 cases. This was followed by no root-end management after root-end resection (33.8%), incorrect root-end preparation (19.1%), inspection error (7.4%), cracks (2.9%), and incomplete root-end resection (1.5%). After resurgery, 41 were followed up for more than 1 year (recall rate, 60.3%), and the success rate was 85.4% (35 out of 41 cases). Conclusions: Root-end filling was shown to be the most important stage in determining the outcome, even when using the biocompatible material, MTA.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"160 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure case analysis during each stage of endodontic microsurgery: A retrospective study based on clinical databases\",\"authors\":\"Changwoo Ryu, Sooil Shin, Yong-Bum Cho, Euiseong Kim, Minju Song\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sej.sej_164_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the most important stage of endodontic surgery by examining failed cases and analyzing the cause of failure during each stage of the procedure. Materials and Methods: We searched the clinical database of the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University, for patients with a history of endodontic microsurgery (EMS) performed between March 2017 and February 2021. Among the 428 patients who underwent EMS, those with a history of endodontic surgery were included. All surgical procedures were performed using a microscope, and the previously resected root surface or the root surface to be resected was inspected during surgery. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months and every year thereafter. Results: A total of 68 cases were included for analysis. The most common cause of failure was incomplete root-end filling (24 cases, 35.3%), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was used in 17 cases. This was followed by no root-end management after root-end resection (33.8%), incorrect root-end preparation (19.1%), inspection error (7.4%), cracks (2.9%), and incomplete root-end resection (1.5%). After resurgery, 41 were followed up for more than 1 year (recall rate, 60.3%), and the success rate was 85.4% (35 out of 41 cases). Conclusions: Root-end filling was shown to be the most important stage in determining the outcome, even when using the biocompatible material, MTA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_164_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_164_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Failure case analysis during each stage of endodontic microsurgery: A retrospective study based on clinical databases
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the most important stage of endodontic surgery by examining failed cases and analyzing the cause of failure during each stage of the procedure. Materials and Methods: We searched the clinical database of the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University, for patients with a history of endodontic microsurgery (EMS) performed between March 2017 and February 2021. Among the 428 patients who underwent EMS, those with a history of endodontic surgery were included. All surgical procedures were performed using a microscope, and the previously resected root surface or the root surface to be resected was inspected during surgery. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months and every year thereafter. Results: A total of 68 cases were included for analysis. The most common cause of failure was incomplete root-end filling (24 cases, 35.3%), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was used in 17 cases. This was followed by no root-end management after root-end resection (33.8%), incorrect root-end preparation (19.1%), inspection error (7.4%), cracks (2.9%), and incomplete root-end resection (1.5%). After resurgery, 41 were followed up for more than 1 year (recall rate, 60.3%), and the success rate was 85.4% (35 out of 41 cases). Conclusions: Root-end filling was shown to be the most important stage in determining the outcome, even when using the biocompatible material, MTA.
期刊介绍:
Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.