根管显微手术各阶段失败病例分析:基于临床数据库的回顾性研究

Q3 Dentistry
Changwoo Ryu, Sooil Shin, Yong-Bum Cho, Euiseong Kim, Minju Song
{"title":"根管显微手术各阶段失败病例分析:基于临床数据库的回顾性研究","authors":"Changwoo Ryu, Sooil Shin, Yong-Bum Cho, Euiseong Kim, Minju Song","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_164_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the most important stage of endodontic surgery by examining failed cases and analyzing the cause of failure during each stage of the procedure. Materials and Methods: We searched the clinical database of the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University, for patients with a history of endodontic microsurgery (EMS) performed between March 2017 and February 2021. Among the 428 patients who underwent EMS, those with a history of endodontic surgery were included. All surgical procedures were performed using a microscope, and the previously resected root surface or the root surface to be resected was inspected during surgery. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months and every year thereafter. Results: A total of 68 cases were included for analysis. The most common cause of failure was incomplete root-end filling (24 cases, 35.3%), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was used in 17 cases. This was followed by no root-end management after root-end resection (33.8%), incorrect root-end preparation (19.1%), inspection error (7.4%), cracks (2.9%), and incomplete root-end resection (1.5%). After resurgery, 41 were followed up for more than 1 year (recall rate, 60.3%), and the success rate was 85.4% (35 out of 41 cases). Conclusions: Root-end filling was shown to be the most important stage in determining the outcome, even when using the biocompatible material, MTA.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"160 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure case analysis during each stage of endodontic microsurgery: A retrospective study based on clinical databases\",\"authors\":\"Changwoo Ryu, Sooil Shin, Yong-Bum Cho, Euiseong Kim, Minju Song\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sej.sej_164_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the most important stage of endodontic surgery by examining failed cases and analyzing the cause of failure during each stage of the procedure. Materials and Methods: We searched the clinical database of the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University, for patients with a history of endodontic microsurgery (EMS) performed between March 2017 and February 2021. Among the 428 patients who underwent EMS, those with a history of endodontic surgery were included. All surgical procedures were performed using a microscope, and the previously resected root surface or the root surface to be resected was inspected during surgery. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months and every year thereafter. Results: A total of 68 cases were included for analysis. The most common cause of failure was incomplete root-end filling (24 cases, 35.3%), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was used in 17 cases. This was followed by no root-end management after root-end resection (33.8%), incorrect root-end preparation (19.1%), inspection error (7.4%), cracks (2.9%), and incomplete root-end resection (1.5%). After resurgery, 41 were followed up for more than 1 year (recall rate, 60.3%), and the success rate was 85.4% (35 out of 41 cases). Conclusions: Root-end filling was shown to be the most important stage in determining the outcome, even when using the biocompatible material, MTA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_164_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_164_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在通过检查牙髓手术中失败的病例,并分析失败的原因,探讨牙髓手术中最重要的阶段。材料与方法:我们检索了檀国大学保守牙科学系的临床数据库,检索了2017年3月至2021年2月间进行牙髓显微手术(EMS)的患者。在428例接受EMS的患者中,包括有牙髓手术史的患者。所有手术过程均在显微镜下进行,术中检查先前切除的根面或待切除的根面。随访时间分别为6个月和12个月,此后每年随访一次。结果:共纳入68例进行分析。最常见的失败原因是根端充填不完全(24例,35.3%),使用三氧化二矿骨料(MTA) 17例。其次是根尖切除后无根尖处理(33.8%)、不正确的根尖准备(19.1%)、检查错误(7.4%)、裂纹(2.9%)和根尖切除不完全(1.5%)。术后随访1年以上41例(回忆率60.3%),成功率85.4%(35 / 41)。结论:即使使用生物相容性材料MTA,根端充填也被证明是决定结果的最重要阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Failure case analysis during each stage of endodontic microsurgery: A retrospective study based on clinical databases
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the most important stage of endodontic surgery by examining failed cases and analyzing the cause of failure during each stage of the procedure. Materials and Methods: We searched the clinical database of the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University, for patients with a history of endodontic microsurgery (EMS) performed between March 2017 and February 2021. Among the 428 patients who underwent EMS, those with a history of endodontic surgery were included. All surgical procedures were performed using a microscope, and the previously resected root surface or the root surface to be resected was inspected during surgery. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months and every year thereafter. Results: A total of 68 cases were included for analysis. The most common cause of failure was incomplete root-end filling (24 cases, 35.3%), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was used in 17 cases. This was followed by no root-end management after root-end resection (33.8%), incorrect root-end preparation (19.1%), inspection error (7.4%), cracks (2.9%), and incomplete root-end resection (1.5%). After resurgery, 41 were followed up for more than 1 year (recall rate, 60.3%), and the success rate was 85.4% (35 out of 41 cases). Conclusions: Root-end filling was shown to be the most important stage in determining the outcome, even when using the biocompatible material, MTA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信