在手治疗学生体验式学习诊所开发职业工具包

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Logan Berlet, V. Kaskutas
{"title":"在手治疗学生体验式学习诊所开发职业工具包","authors":"Logan Berlet, V. Kaskutas","doi":"10.1177/1758998320912680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Combining occupation-based and biomechanical approaches is effective to increase function after hand injury. This project developed and evaluated occupation kits as a means to increase occupation-based practice. Methods Descriptive study that utilized existing Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand data from 642 patients treated by hand surgeon and patients in our Hand Therapy Student Experiential Learning Clinic (HTSELC) to identify difficult activities. These data informed the selection of occupational areas to address with the kits. Biomechanical demands of each kit developed were quantified by 10 student therapists using the Abilities Questionnaire. Fourteen occupational therapists reviewed and rated the usefulness of each kit by survey. Kits were piloted in the HTSELC, and student therapists documented the percentage of time delivering each intervention type: activity/occupation, preparatory methods and tasks, education, advocacy, and group. The degree of occupation-based practice was compared using intervention type percentages before and after introduction of the kits. Results Ten kits were created to address most occupation categories within occupational therapy’s scope of practice. Kits include procedures, safety precautions, and a standardized scale to objectively measure performance. Clinicians noted that kits reflected each occupation well (3.7/5) and 45% reported they were likely to use the kits. After the kits became available in the HTSELC, the percentage of interventions at the occupation/activity level increased from 19% to 26% and biomechanical interventions, including preparatory methods and tasks, decreased from 61% to 49%. Conclusion This research suggests that occupation kits can be a first step to help therapists deliver occupation-based interventions in hand therapy settings.","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"30 1","pages":"73 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing occupation kits in a Hand Therapy Student Experiential Learning Clinic\",\"authors\":\"Logan Berlet, V. Kaskutas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1758998320912680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Combining occupation-based and biomechanical approaches is effective to increase function after hand injury. This project developed and evaluated occupation kits as a means to increase occupation-based practice. Methods Descriptive study that utilized existing Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand data from 642 patients treated by hand surgeon and patients in our Hand Therapy Student Experiential Learning Clinic (HTSELC) to identify difficult activities. These data informed the selection of occupational areas to address with the kits. Biomechanical demands of each kit developed were quantified by 10 student therapists using the Abilities Questionnaire. Fourteen occupational therapists reviewed and rated the usefulness of each kit by survey. Kits were piloted in the HTSELC, and student therapists documented the percentage of time delivering each intervention type: activity/occupation, preparatory methods and tasks, education, advocacy, and group. The degree of occupation-based practice was compared using intervention type percentages before and after introduction of the kits. Results Ten kits were created to address most occupation categories within occupational therapy’s scope of practice. Kits include procedures, safety precautions, and a standardized scale to objectively measure performance. Clinicians noted that kits reflected each occupation well (3.7/5) and 45% reported they were likely to use the kits. After the kits became available in the HTSELC, the percentage of interventions at the occupation/activity level increased from 19% to 26% and biomechanical interventions, including preparatory methods and tasks, decreased from 61% to 49%. Conclusion This research suggests that occupation kits can be a first step to help therapists deliver occupation-based interventions in hand therapy settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998320912680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998320912680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于职业和生物力学相结合的方法可以有效地提高手部损伤后的功能。该项目开发并评估了职业工具包,作为增加基于职业的实践的手段。方法采用描述性研究,利用来自642名接受手外科医生治疗的患者和我们的手部治疗学生体验式学习诊所(HTSELC)患者的现有手臂、肩部和手部残疾数据来识别困难活动。这些数据为选择用工具包处理的职业领域提供了信息。每个工具包的生物力学需求由10名学生治疗师使用能力问卷进行量化。14名职业治疗师通过调查审查和评估每个工具包的有用性。工具包在HTSELC中试用,学生治疗师记录了提供每种干预类型的时间百分比:活动/职业、准备方法和任务、教育、宣传和小组。采用干预类型百分比对引入工具包前后的职业实践程度进行比较。结果创建了10个工具包,涵盖了职业治疗实践范围内的大多数职业类别。套件包括程序、安全预防措施和客观测量性能的标准化量表。临床医生指出,试剂盒很好地反映了每个职业(3.7/5),45%的人报告他们可能会使用试剂盒。在HTSELC中提供工具包后,职业/活动水平的干预百分比从19%增加到26%,生物力学干预,包括准备方法和任务,从61%下降到49%。结论:本研究表明,职业工具包可以成为帮助治疗师在手部治疗环境中提供基于职业的干预措施的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing occupation kits in a Hand Therapy Student Experiential Learning Clinic
Introduction Combining occupation-based and biomechanical approaches is effective to increase function after hand injury. This project developed and evaluated occupation kits as a means to increase occupation-based practice. Methods Descriptive study that utilized existing Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand data from 642 patients treated by hand surgeon and patients in our Hand Therapy Student Experiential Learning Clinic (HTSELC) to identify difficult activities. These data informed the selection of occupational areas to address with the kits. Biomechanical demands of each kit developed were quantified by 10 student therapists using the Abilities Questionnaire. Fourteen occupational therapists reviewed and rated the usefulness of each kit by survey. Kits were piloted in the HTSELC, and student therapists documented the percentage of time delivering each intervention type: activity/occupation, preparatory methods and tasks, education, advocacy, and group. The degree of occupation-based practice was compared using intervention type percentages before and after introduction of the kits. Results Ten kits were created to address most occupation categories within occupational therapy’s scope of practice. Kits include procedures, safety precautions, and a standardized scale to objectively measure performance. Clinicians noted that kits reflected each occupation well (3.7/5) and 45% reported they were likely to use the kits. After the kits became available in the HTSELC, the percentage of interventions at the occupation/activity level increased from 19% to 26% and biomechanical interventions, including preparatory methods and tasks, decreased from 61% to 49%. Conclusion This research suggests that occupation kits can be a first step to help therapists deliver occupation-based interventions in hand therapy settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信