冠状动脉支架植入术中芬太尼个体化给药方案的应用

D. Dziuba
{"title":"冠状动脉支架植入术中芬太尼个体化给药方案的应用","authors":"D. Dziuba","doi":"10.31928/2305-3127-2020.4.1119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim – to develop a personalized scheme of fentanyl administrationfor coronary artery stenting. Materials and methods. Ninety patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent planned stenting of the coronary arteries were studied. The patients who underwent surgery were evenly divided into three study groups, depending on mode of the intraoperative analgesic sedation and the approaches to anesthesia. The first comparison group consisted of patients who received slow intravenous administration of diazepam and fentanyl solutions. The second comparison group consisted of patients with balanced administration of fentanyl and propofol solutions to provide analgesic sedation at the level of conscious anesthesia. The study group consisted of patients with a personalized approach to the administration of opiates, namely, we used the original fentanyl test described in the article. Analgesic sedation at the level of conscious anesthesia (ІІІ by Ramsey) was maintained by propofol infusion. Results. The usage of a personalized scheme of fentanyl administration for stenting of the coronary arteries, compared to the standard sedation using combination of diazepam and fentanyl, was accompanied by better indicators of intraoperative blood saturation with oxygen and carbon dioxide (respectively (103.67 ± 22.05) and (39.64 ± 6.85) mm Hg in group 1, (105.70 ± 31.64) and (37.68 ± 7.11) in group 2 and (109.42 ± 34.36) and (36.25 ± 6.52) mm Hg in patients of the 3rd group), lower blood pressure after surgery ((127.85 ± 9.87)/(79.64 ± 8.62) mm Hg in patients of group 1, (129.48 ± 8.73)/(81.05 ± 7.92) mm Hg in group 2 and (131.15 ± 10.64)/(82.68 ± 9.72) mm Hg in group 3), lower level of stress markers (blood cortisol during surgery in patients of the 1st group (8.83 ± 4.58) mmol/L, in patients of the 2nd group – (7.73 ± 2.79) mmol/L, in patients of the 3rd group – (7.55 ± 4.35) mmol/L), as well as lower frequency of detecting episodes of perioperative pain of various origins. Conclusions. A method of personalized anesthesia was elaborated, based on individual scheme of fentanyl administration («fentanyl test») during coronary artery stenting. Its usage is safe (due to the optimal parameters of gas exchange and hemodynamics and fewer side effects, such as nausea and residual sedation) and effective (due to the lower level of stress markers and less frequent complaints of pain of various origins) than when the routine technique was used. Key words: analgesic sedation, individual sensitivity, fentanyl, diazepam, propofol.","PeriodicalId":9540,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The usage of personalized scheme of fentanyl administration during coronary artery stenting\",\"authors\":\"D. Dziuba\",\"doi\":\"10.31928/2305-3127-2020.4.1119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim – to develop a personalized scheme of fentanyl administrationfor coronary artery stenting. Materials and methods. Ninety patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent planned stenting of the coronary arteries were studied. The patients who underwent surgery were evenly divided into three study groups, depending on mode of the intraoperative analgesic sedation and the approaches to anesthesia. The first comparison group consisted of patients who received slow intravenous administration of diazepam and fentanyl solutions. The second comparison group consisted of patients with balanced administration of fentanyl and propofol solutions to provide analgesic sedation at the level of conscious anesthesia. The study group consisted of patients with a personalized approach to the administration of opiates, namely, we used the original fentanyl test described in the article. Analgesic sedation at the level of conscious anesthesia (ІІІ by Ramsey) was maintained by propofol infusion. Results. The usage of a personalized scheme of fentanyl administration for stenting of the coronary arteries, compared to the standard sedation using combination of diazepam and fentanyl, was accompanied by better indicators of intraoperative blood saturation with oxygen and carbon dioxide (respectively (103.67 ± 22.05) and (39.64 ± 6.85) mm Hg in group 1, (105.70 ± 31.64) and (37.68 ± 7.11) in group 2 and (109.42 ± 34.36) and (36.25 ± 6.52) mm Hg in patients of the 3rd group), lower blood pressure after surgery ((127.85 ± 9.87)/(79.64 ± 8.62) mm Hg in patients of group 1, (129.48 ± 8.73)/(81.05 ± 7.92) mm Hg in group 2 and (131.15 ± 10.64)/(82.68 ± 9.72) mm Hg in group 3), lower level of stress markers (blood cortisol during surgery in patients of the 1st group (8.83 ± 4.58) mmol/L, in patients of the 2nd group – (7.73 ± 2.79) mmol/L, in patients of the 3rd group – (7.55 ± 4.35) mmol/L), as well as lower frequency of detecting episodes of perioperative pain of various origins. Conclusions. A method of personalized anesthesia was elaborated, based on individual scheme of fentanyl administration («fentanyl test») during coronary artery stenting. Its usage is safe (due to the optimal parameters of gas exchange and hemodynamics and fewer side effects, such as nausea and residual sedation) and effective (due to the lower level of stress markers and less frequent complaints of pain of various origins) than when the routine technique was used. Key words: analgesic sedation, individual sensitivity, fentanyl, diazepam, propofol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31928/2305-3127-2020.4.1119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31928/2305-3127-2020.4.1119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是为冠状动脉支架植入术提供一种个性化的芬太尼给药方案。材料和方法。90例缺血性心脏病患者接受有计划的冠状动脉支架置入术。根据术中镇痛镇静方式和麻醉方式,将接受手术的患者平均分为三个研究组。第一组患者接受缓慢静脉注射安定和芬太尼溶液。第二组患者采用芬太尼和异丙酚溶液平衡给药,在清醒麻醉水平提供镇痛镇静作用。研究组由采用个性化方法给药阿片类药物的患者组成,即我们使用文章中描述的原始芬太尼试验。在意识麻醉水平(ІІІ by Ramsey),通过输注异丙酚维持镇痛镇静。结果。使用芬太尼的个性化方案管理冠状动脉的支架,相比标准镇静安定的使用组合和芬太尼,是伴随着更好的术中血液指标与氧气和二氧化碳饱和(分别为(103.67±22.05)和(39.64±6.85)在组1毫米汞柱,(105.70±31.64)和(37.68±7.11)在组2和(109.42±34.36)和(36.25±6.52)毫米汞柱的病人第三组),术后血压降低(1组患者为(127.85±9.87)/(79.64±8.62)mm Hg, 2组患者为(129.48±8.73)/(81.05±7.92)mm Hg, 3组患者为(131.15±10.64)/(82.68±9.72)mm Hg),应激指标降低(1组患者术中血皮质醇(8.83±4.58)mmol/L, 2组患者为(7.73±2.79)mmol/L, 3组患者为(7.55±4.35)mmol/L),以及各种来源的围手术期疼痛发作的检测频率较低。结论。根据冠状动脉支架植入术中芬太尼给药方案(“芬太尼试验”),阐述了一种个性化麻醉方法。它的使用是安全的(由于气体交换和血流动力学的最佳参数和更少的副作用,如恶心和残余镇静)和有效的(由于较低的应激标志物水平和较少的各种来源的疼痛的抱怨)比常规技术使用时。关键词:镇痛镇静,个体敏感性,芬太尼,安定,异丙酚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The usage of personalized scheme of fentanyl administration during coronary artery stenting
The aim – to develop a personalized scheme of fentanyl administrationfor coronary artery stenting. Materials and methods. Ninety patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent planned stenting of the coronary arteries were studied. The patients who underwent surgery were evenly divided into three study groups, depending on mode of the intraoperative analgesic sedation and the approaches to anesthesia. The first comparison group consisted of patients who received slow intravenous administration of diazepam and fentanyl solutions. The second comparison group consisted of patients with balanced administration of fentanyl and propofol solutions to provide analgesic sedation at the level of conscious anesthesia. The study group consisted of patients with a personalized approach to the administration of opiates, namely, we used the original fentanyl test described in the article. Analgesic sedation at the level of conscious anesthesia (ІІІ by Ramsey) was maintained by propofol infusion. Results. The usage of a personalized scheme of fentanyl administration for stenting of the coronary arteries, compared to the standard sedation using combination of diazepam and fentanyl, was accompanied by better indicators of intraoperative blood saturation with oxygen and carbon dioxide (respectively (103.67 ± 22.05) and (39.64 ± 6.85) mm Hg in group 1, (105.70 ± 31.64) and (37.68 ± 7.11) in group 2 and (109.42 ± 34.36) and (36.25 ± 6.52) mm Hg in patients of the 3rd group), lower blood pressure after surgery ((127.85 ± 9.87)/(79.64 ± 8.62) mm Hg in patients of group 1, (129.48 ± 8.73)/(81.05 ± 7.92) mm Hg in group 2 and (131.15 ± 10.64)/(82.68 ± 9.72) mm Hg in group 3), lower level of stress markers (blood cortisol during surgery in patients of the 1st group (8.83 ± 4.58) mmol/L, in patients of the 2nd group – (7.73 ± 2.79) mmol/L, in patients of the 3rd group – (7.55 ± 4.35) mmol/L), as well as lower frequency of detecting episodes of perioperative pain of various origins. Conclusions. A method of personalized anesthesia was elaborated, based on individual scheme of fentanyl administration («fentanyl test») during coronary artery stenting. Its usage is safe (due to the optimal parameters of gas exchange and hemodynamics and fewer side effects, such as nausea and residual sedation) and effective (due to the lower level of stress markers and less frequent complaints of pain of various origins) than when the routine technique was used. Key words: analgesic sedation, individual sensitivity, fentanyl, diazepam, propofol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信