{"title":"动脉线性缺血的溶栓治疗。","authors":"J. Geschwind, M. Dagli, D. Lambert, H. Kobeiter","doi":"10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0590:TTITSO>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo evaluate the use of percutaneous transcatheter thrombolysis in the treatment of thrombosis due to radial artery cannulation.\n\n\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\nSeven patients (4 women; age range 41-62 years) with symptomatic cannulation-induced thrombosis and failure to improve after systemic anticoagulation underwent 8 catheter-directed thrombolytic infusions at our institution over a 3-year period. Access was either antegrade through the brachial artery or retrograde through the femoral artery. Thrombolytic infusions with urokinase began 2 to 12 days (average 6) after removal of the radial artery catheter. The thrombolytic infusion was successful in 5 of 7 patients based on angiographic flow restoration with <20% residual thrombus and significant clinical improvement in the ischemia.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWhen systemic anticoagulation has failed, percutaneous catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion appears to be effective in the treatment of most patients with severe ischemic hand symptoms due to thrombosis after radial artery cannulation.","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"116 1","pages":"590-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombolytic therapy in the setting of arterial line-induced ischemia.\",\"authors\":\"J. Geschwind, M. Dagli, D. Lambert, H. Kobeiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0590:TTITSO>2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nTo evaluate the use of percutaneous transcatheter thrombolysis in the treatment of thrombosis due to radial artery cannulation.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\\nSeven patients (4 women; age range 41-62 years) with symptomatic cannulation-induced thrombosis and failure to improve after systemic anticoagulation underwent 8 catheter-directed thrombolytic infusions at our institution over a 3-year period. Access was either antegrade through the brachial artery or retrograde through the femoral artery. Thrombolytic infusions with urokinase began 2 to 12 days (average 6) after removal of the radial artery catheter. The thrombolytic infusion was successful in 5 of 7 patients based on angiographic flow restoration with <20% residual thrombus and significant clinical improvement in the ischemia.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nWhen systemic anticoagulation has failed, percutaneous catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion appears to be effective in the treatment of most patients with severe ischemic hand symptoms due to thrombosis after radial artery cannulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":60152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"590-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0590:TTITSO>2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0590:TTITSO>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thrombolytic therapy in the setting of arterial line-induced ischemia.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the use of percutaneous transcatheter thrombolysis in the treatment of thrombosis due to radial artery cannulation.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Seven patients (4 women; age range 41-62 years) with symptomatic cannulation-induced thrombosis and failure to improve after systemic anticoagulation underwent 8 catheter-directed thrombolytic infusions at our institution over a 3-year period. Access was either antegrade through the brachial artery or retrograde through the femoral artery. Thrombolytic infusions with urokinase began 2 to 12 days (average 6) after removal of the radial artery catheter. The thrombolytic infusion was successful in 5 of 7 patients based on angiographic flow restoration with <20% residual thrombus and significant clinical improvement in the ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS
When systemic anticoagulation has failed, percutaneous catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion appears to be effective in the treatment of most patients with severe ischemic hand symptoms due to thrombosis after radial artery cannulation.