农村心理学与COVID-19大流行:突出优势和未来方向。

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Goodwin, Amanda C. Lints-Martindale, M. Conan, J. Kinley, Tasmiah Rahman
{"title":"农村心理学与COVID-19大流行:突出优势和未来方向。","authors":"S. Goodwin, Amanda C. Lints-Martindale, M. Conan, J. Kinley, Tasmiah Rahman","doi":"10.1037/cap0000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public Significance Statement Rural mental health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been widely discussed within the existing literature. Challenges and strengths specific to rural Canada are reviewed within the context of COVID-19 with recommendations for future directions provided to the reader. These recommendations are important for practitioners and policymakers to consider, as they provide future directions for policy development. Recommendations include ensuring mental health policies and practices implemented in rural and remote communities maintain a rural perspective. The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted Canadians' mental health, including those who live in rural areas. Rural psychologists have long faced unique challenges associated with practice related to accessibility, isolation, and technology. They also have extensive experience in practicing with flexibility, creativity, and complex ethical considerations such as competency (generalist vs. specialist, cultural competence vs. content competence). Therefore, they may have adapted relatively rapidly to the dramatic changes that came along with the pandemic and be well positioned to lead their urban colleagues and organizations as we move forward. Whereas new and pre-existing challenges have been exacerbated by the pandemic, strengths of rural psychologists (e.g., managing geographical isolation, familiarity with telehealth) have emerged. This article looks at the strengths embedded in rural psychology that facilitated service provision during the pandemic. It also reviews future directions to build upon within the rural Canadian context.","PeriodicalId":47883,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural psychology and the COVID-19 pandemic: Highlighting strengths and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"S. Goodwin, Amanda C. Lints-Martindale, M. Conan, J. Kinley, Tasmiah Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cap0000308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public Significance Statement Rural mental health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been widely discussed within the existing literature. Challenges and strengths specific to rural Canada are reviewed within the context of COVID-19 with recommendations for future directions provided to the reader. These recommendations are important for practitioners and policymakers to consider, as they provide future directions for policy development. Recommendations include ensuring mental health policies and practices implemented in rural and remote communities maintain a rural perspective. The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted Canadians' mental health, including those who live in rural areas. Rural psychologists have long faced unique challenges associated with practice related to accessibility, isolation, and technology. They also have extensive experience in practicing with flexibility, creativity, and complex ethical considerations such as competency (generalist vs. specialist, cultural competence vs. content competence). Therefore, they may have adapted relatively rapidly to the dramatic changes that came along with the pandemic and be well positioned to lead their urban colleagues and organizations as we move forward. Whereas new and pre-existing challenges have been exacerbated by the pandemic, strengths of rural psychologists (e.g., managing geographical isolation, familiarity with telehealth) have emerged. This article looks at the strengths embedded in rural psychology that facilitated service provision during the pandemic. It also reviews future directions to build upon within the rural Canadian context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在现有文献中,COVID-19大流行期间农村心理卫生需求尚未得到广泛讨论。在2019冠状病毒病的背景下,审查了加拿大农村特有的挑战和优势,并向读者提供了未来发展方向的建议。这些建议对于从业者和政策制定者来说非常重要,因为它们为政策制定提供了未来的方向。建议包括确保在农村和偏远社区实施的精神卫生政策和做法保持农村视角。冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行极大地影响了加拿大人的心理健康,包括那些生活在农村地区的人。长期以来,农村心理学家一直面临着与可及性、隔离和技术相关的独特挑战。他们在灵活性、创造性和复杂的道德考虑方面也有丰富的实践经验,比如能力(通才vs专家,文化能力vs内容能力)。因此,他们可能已经相对迅速地适应了大流行带来的巨大变化,并在我们前进的过程中有能力领导他们的城市同事和组织。虽然疫情加剧了新的和已有的挑战,但农村心理学家的优势(例如,管理地理隔离、熟悉远程保健)已经显现。本文着眼于农村心理学在大流行期间促进服务提供的优势。它还审查了在加拿大农村背景下建立的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural psychology and the COVID-19 pandemic: Highlighting strengths and future directions.
Public Significance Statement Rural mental health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been widely discussed within the existing literature. Challenges and strengths specific to rural Canada are reviewed within the context of COVID-19 with recommendations for future directions provided to the reader. These recommendations are important for practitioners and policymakers to consider, as they provide future directions for policy development. Recommendations include ensuring mental health policies and practices implemented in rural and remote communities maintain a rural perspective. The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted Canadians' mental health, including those who live in rural areas. Rural psychologists have long faced unique challenges associated with practice related to accessibility, isolation, and technology. They also have extensive experience in practicing with flexibility, creativity, and complex ethical considerations such as competency (generalist vs. specialist, cultural competence vs. content competence). Therefore, they may have adapted relatively rapidly to the dramatic changes that came along with the pandemic and be well positioned to lead their urban colleagues and organizations as we move forward. Whereas new and pre-existing challenges have been exacerbated by the pandemic, strengths of rural psychologists (e.g., managing geographical isolation, familiarity with telehealth) have emerged. This article looks at the strengths embedded in rural psychology that facilitated service provision during the pandemic. It also reviews future directions to build upon within the rural Canadian context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne
Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Canadian Psychology has a mandate to present generalist articles in areas of theory, research, and practice that are potentially of interest to a broad cross-section of psychologists. Manuscripts with direct relevance to the context of Canadian psychology are also appropriate for submission. Original, empirical contributions are not within the mandate of the journal, unless the research is of direct relevance to the discipline as a whole (e.g., a survey of psychologists about the future of the discipline).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信