多重创伤患者快速诊断结果与腹部CT结果准确性的比较研究

Y. Demir, S. Akay, S. Yolcu, Ali Savas Miran, Tugba Cicek Durak, I. Parlak
{"title":"多重创伤患者快速诊断结果与腹部CT结果准确性的比较研究","authors":"Y. Demir, S. Akay, S. Yolcu, Ali Savas Miran, Tugba Cicek Durak, I. Parlak","doi":"10.5152/JAEM.2014.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In our study, we aimed to investigate the accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings of multitrauma patients in com parison with abdominal CT results. Material and Methods: Age, gender, demographic properties, trauma type, arrival method to the emergency service, abdominal USG results, abdominal CT results, results of other CT scans, hospitalization data, and hemoglobin (Hb) and white blood cell count (WBC) values of the patients were recorded. Results: One hundred eighty (79.6%) males and 46 (20.4%) females (total 226 patients) were included to our study. Mean age was 38.74±17.18; 203 (89.8%) patients were traffic accidents, and 23 (10.2%) patients were falls from heights. The sensitivity of FAST was 50% and specificity was 93.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 60 and negative predictive value was 90.8%. Conclusion: Multiple trauma patients with positive USG findings according to their hemodynamic situations and multitrauma patients with suspicious USG findings should undergo abdominal CT scan in the emergency service. (JAEM 2014; 13: 104-7)","PeriodicalId":14780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Accuracy of FAST Findings of Multitrauma Patients in Comparison with Abdominal CT Results\",\"authors\":\"Y. Demir, S. Akay, S. Yolcu, Ali Savas Miran, Tugba Cicek Durak, I. Parlak\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/JAEM.2014.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: In our study, we aimed to investigate the accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings of multitrauma patients in com parison with abdominal CT results. Material and Methods: Age, gender, demographic properties, trauma type, arrival method to the emergency service, abdominal USG results, abdominal CT results, results of other CT scans, hospitalization data, and hemoglobin (Hb) and white blood cell count (WBC) values of the patients were recorded. Results: One hundred eighty (79.6%) males and 46 (20.4%) females (total 226 patients) were included to our study. Mean age was 38.74±17.18; 203 (89.8%) patients were traffic accidents, and 23 (10.2%) patients were falls from heights. The sensitivity of FAST was 50% and specificity was 93.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 60 and negative predictive value was 90.8%. Conclusion: Multiple trauma patients with positive USG findings according to their hemodynamic situations and multitrauma patients with suspicious USG findings should undergo abdominal CT scan in the emergency service. (JAEM 2014; 13: 104-7)\",\"PeriodicalId\":14780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/JAEM.2014.70037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/JAEM.2014.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在我们的研究中,我们旨在探讨创伤聚焦评估超声(FAST)在多重创伤患者中的发现与腹部CT结果的准确性。材料与方法:记录患者的年龄、性别、人口统计学特征、创伤类型、到达急救中心的方式、腹部USG结果、腹部CT结果、其他CT扫描结果、住院资料、血红蛋白(Hb)和白细胞计数(WBC)值。结果:纳入226例患者,男性180例(79.6%),女性46例(20.4%)。平均年龄38.74±17.18岁;交通事故203例(89.8%),高空坠落23例(10.2%)。FAST的敏感性为50%,特异性为93.7%。阳性预测值(PPV)为60,阴性预测值为90.8%。结论:根据血流动力学情况USG阳性的多发创伤患者和USG可疑的多发创伤患者应在急诊行腹部CT扫描。(JAEM 2014;13: 104 - 7)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of Accuracy of FAST Findings of Multitrauma Patients in Comparison with Abdominal CT Results
Objective: In our study, we aimed to investigate the accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) findings of multitrauma patients in com parison with abdominal CT results. Material and Methods: Age, gender, demographic properties, trauma type, arrival method to the emergency service, abdominal USG results, abdominal CT results, results of other CT scans, hospitalization data, and hemoglobin (Hb) and white blood cell count (WBC) values of the patients were recorded. Results: One hundred eighty (79.6%) males and 46 (20.4%) females (total 226 patients) were included to our study. Mean age was 38.74±17.18; 203 (89.8%) patients were traffic accidents, and 23 (10.2%) patients were falls from heights. The sensitivity of FAST was 50% and specificity was 93.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 60 and negative predictive value was 90.8%. Conclusion: Multiple trauma patients with positive USG findings according to their hemodynamic situations and multitrauma patients with suspicious USG findings should undergo abdominal CT scan in the emergency service. (JAEM 2014; 13: 104-7)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信