1999年尼日利亚宪法下的权力分立:核心法律困境

Q3 Social Sciences
O. Adegbite, Oreoluwa Omotayo Oduniyi, Jubril Akinwunmi Farinde
{"title":"1999年尼日利亚宪法下的权力分立:核心法律困境","authors":"O. Adegbite, Oreoluwa Omotayo Oduniyi, Jubril Akinwunmi Farinde","doi":"10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.281.PP235-252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the core of Nigeria's constitutional practice lies the doctrine of separation of powers. The application of the principle is such that power under Nigeria's presidential cum federal system is delineated both horizontally and vertically. Even though the doctrine has a major feature of every constitution in the world, its implementation does not seem satisfactory given the insults that have been carried out by successive governments. This paper examines the doctrine of separation of powers and its complicatedness as regards to its practice in Nigeria's constitutional democracy. Reflecting on the history of Nigeria, this paper will discuss the eroded implementation of the principle of separation. As a result, it seems to be that the concept of \"separation\" is not going well and tends to fuse the function of executive and legislative institutions. In this situation, the principle is in a dilemma. This paper further offers a flicker of hope by pointing to the fact that all hopes do not appear lost, as the Judiciary still maintains some level of ‘separateness,' except that only time will tell as to how much this lasts.","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Separation of Powers Under the 1999 Nigerian Constitution: The Core Legal Dilemmas\",\"authors\":\"O. Adegbite, Oreoluwa Omotayo Oduniyi, Jubril Akinwunmi Farinde\",\"doi\":\"10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.281.PP235-252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the core of Nigeria's constitutional practice lies the doctrine of separation of powers. The application of the principle is such that power under Nigeria's presidential cum federal system is delineated both horizontally and vertically. Even though the doctrine has a major feature of every constitution in the world, its implementation does not seem satisfactory given the insults that have been carried out by successive governments. This paper examines the doctrine of separation of powers and its complicatedness as regards to its practice in Nigeria's constitutional democracy. Reflecting on the history of Nigeria, this paper will discuss the eroded implementation of the principle of separation. As a result, it seems to be that the concept of \\\"separation\\\" is not going well and tends to fuse the function of executive and legislative institutions. In this situation, the principle is in a dilemma. This paper further offers a flicker of hope by pointing to the fact that all hopes do not appear lost, as the Judiciary still maintains some level of ‘separateness,' except that only time will tell as to how much this lasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.281.PP235-252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL3.ISS2.281.PP235-252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尼日利亚宪法实践的核心是权力分立原则。在尼日利亚的总统制和联邦制下,这一原则的适用是横向和纵向划分的。尽管这一原则是世界上每一部宪法的主要特征,但考虑到历届政府所实施的侮辱,它的实施似乎并不令人满意。本文考察了权力分立理论及其在尼日利亚宪政民主实践中的复杂性。反思尼日利亚的历史,本文将讨论分离原则的执行受到侵蚀。因此,“分离”的概念似乎并不顺利,并倾向于将行政和立法机构的职能融合在一起。在这种情况下,原则陷入了两难境地。这篇文章进一步提供了一丝希望,指出所有的希望似乎都没有消失,因为司法机构仍然保持着某种程度的“分离”,只是只有时间才能证明这种分离会持续多久。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Separation of Powers Under the 1999 Nigerian Constitution: The Core Legal Dilemmas
At the core of Nigeria's constitutional practice lies the doctrine of separation of powers. The application of the principle is such that power under Nigeria's presidential cum federal system is delineated both horizontally and vertically. Even though the doctrine has a major feature of every constitution in the world, its implementation does not seem satisfactory given the insults that have been carried out by successive governments. This paper examines the doctrine of separation of powers and its complicatedness as regards to its practice in Nigeria's constitutional democracy. Reflecting on the history of Nigeria, this paper will discuss the eroded implementation of the principle of separation. As a result, it seems to be that the concept of "separation" is not going well and tends to fuse the function of executive and legislative institutions. In this situation, the principle is in a dilemma. This paper further offers a flicker of hope by pointing to the fact that all hopes do not appear lost, as the Judiciary still maintains some level of ‘separateness,' except that only time will tell as to how much this lasts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sriwijaya Law Review
Sriwijaya Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信