在中国,人才分配摩擦能解释多大程度的群体间工资差距?

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Zhe Li, Qingyu Peng
{"title":"在中国,人才分配摩擦能解释多大程度的群体间工资差距?","authors":"Zhe Li,&nbsp;Qingyu Peng","doi":"10.1002/ise3.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What explains huge wage gaps between different <i>hukou</i> and gender groups in China? This paper uses an overlapping generation model with human capital investment and occupational choices to quantify how much wage gaps between these groups can be imputed to two types of talent allocation frictions, labor market discrimination, and human capital accumulation barriers. The calibrated model indicates that the two types of talent allocation frictions can explain a significant proportion (four-fifths, one-third, and three-fifths) of the wage gap between each non-urban-men group (urban women, rural men, and rural women) and urban men in 2013. Our counterfactual exercise also shows that eliminating these two frictions since 1995 would result in about half a percentage point increase in China's economic growth rate between 1995 and 2013.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"17 2","pages":"183-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.16","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How much between-group wage gaps can be explained by talent allocation frictions in China?\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Li,&nbsp;Qingyu Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ise3.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>What explains huge wage gaps between different <i>hukou</i> and gender groups in China? This paper uses an overlapping generation model with human capital investment and occupational choices to quantify how much wage gaps between these groups can be imputed to two types of talent allocation frictions, labor market discrimination, and human capital accumulation barriers. The calibrated model indicates that the two types of talent allocation frictions can explain a significant proportion (four-fifths, one-third, and three-fifths) of the wage gap between each non-urban-men group (urban women, rural men, and rural women) and urban men in 2013. Our counterfactual exercise also shows that eliminating these two frictions since 1995 would result in about half a percentage point increase in China's economic growth rate between 1995 and 2013.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Studies of Economics\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"183-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.16\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Studies of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ise3.16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ise3.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如何解释中国不同户口和性别群体之间巨大的工资差距?本文使用一个包含人力资本投资和职业选择的重叠代模型,量化了这些群体之间的工资差距在多大程度上可以归因于两种类型的人才配置摩擦、劳动力市场歧视和人力资本积累障碍。校准后的模型表明,两种类型的人才分配摩擦可以解释2013年每个非城市男性群体(城市女性、农村男性和农村女性)与城市男性之间的工资差距的很大比例(五分之四、三分之一和五分之三)。我们的反事实练习也表明,消除1995年以来的这两个摩擦,将使中国1995年至2013年的经济增长率提高约0.5个百分点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How much between-group wage gaps can be explained by talent allocation frictions in China?

How much between-group wage gaps can be explained by talent allocation frictions in China?

What explains huge wage gaps between different hukou and gender groups in China? This paper uses an overlapping generation model with human capital investment and occupational choices to quantify how much wage gaps between these groups can be imputed to two types of talent allocation frictions, labor market discrimination, and human capital accumulation barriers. The calibrated model indicates that the two types of talent allocation frictions can explain a significant proportion (four-fifths, one-third, and three-fifths) of the wage gap between each non-urban-men group (urban women, rural men, and rural women) and urban men in 2013. Our counterfactual exercise also shows that eliminating these two frictions since 1995 would result in about half a percentage point increase in China's economic growth rate between 1995 and 2013.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信