{"title":"本福德定律在实验领域的局限性","authors":"S. B. D. Silva","doi":"10.12732/ijam.v33i4.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two of the main flaws of Benford’s law will be discussed in this article: (i) the first one, which leads the observer to consider an experimental dataset as the result of a single random variable rather than several, makes this law so mysterious; (ii) the second one is that Benford’s probabilities have long been considered as perfect values: this is obviously not the case. AMS Subject Classification: 60E05","PeriodicalId":14365,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pure and applied mathematics","volume":"16 1","pages":"685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIMITS OF BENFORD'S LAW IN EXPERIMENTAL FIELD\",\"authors\":\"S. B. D. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.12732/ijam.v33i4.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two of the main flaws of Benford’s law will be discussed in this article: (i) the first one, which leads the observer to consider an experimental dataset as the result of a single random variable rather than several, makes this law so mysterious; (ii) the second one is that Benford’s probabilities have long been considered as perfect values: this is obviously not the case. AMS Subject Classification: 60E05\",\"PeriodicalId\":14365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pure and applied mathematics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pure and applied mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v33i4.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pure and applied mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v33i4.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two of the main flaws of Benford’s law will be discussed in this article: (i) the first one, which leads the observer to consider an experimental dataset as the result of a single random variable rather than several, makes this law so mysterious; (ii) the second one is that Benford’s probabilities have long been considered as perfect values: this is obviously not the case. AMS Subject Classification: 60E05